Pheidole megacephala: An invasive ant that raids colonies of the red imported fire ant, Solenopsis invicta

IF 4.4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Ecology Pub Date : 2025-05-13 DOI:10.1002/ecy.70113
Airlan San Juan, Frédéric Azémar, Alain Dejean
{"title":"Pheidole megacephala: An invasive ant that raids colonies of the red imported fire ant, Solenopsis invicta","authors":"Airlan San Juan,&nbsp;Frédéric Azémar,&nbsp;Alain Dejean","doi":"10.1002/ecy.70113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The establishment and spread of many imported ant species are facilitated by a high level of reproduction, the future queens mating without nuptial flight so that the colonies reproduce through budding. The colonies are polygynous (i.e., multiple queens) and form unicolonial societies that spread over large areas and reach high densities, often outcompeting native ants through ecological dominance (Suarez et al., <span>2010</span>; Wong et al., <span>2023</span>).</p><p>These characteristics are present in the well-known invasive species <i>Pheidole megacephala</i>, or the big-headed ant, native to tropical Africa. Like most <i>Pheidole</i> species, its worker caste is dimorphic with small minors and big-headed majors or “soldiers,” both having small stingers that serve only to lay odor trails (Wilson, <span>2003</span>). In its introduced range, this species forms large, unicolonial societies to the point that no intraspecific aggressiveness between workers was noted in different geographical areas of Australia over 3000 km (Fournier et al., <span>2009</span>). Consequently, <i>P. megacephala</i> outcompetes native ants through interference competition and especially by raiding their colonies (Figure 1), a characteristic inherited from its native range that even permits it to resist the assault of army ants (Dejean et al., <span>2008</span>, <span>2014</span>; Dejean, Kenne, et al., <span>2007</span>; Dejean, Moreau, et al., <span>2007</span>; Sarnat et al., <span>2015</span>; see Kamaru et al., <span>2024</span> for an indirect effect).</p><p>Unlike most other invasive ants, the red imported fire ant, <i>Solenopsis invicta</i>, is monogynous. Native to South America, it was imported into the United States in the 1930s around Mobile, Alabama. However, polygynous populations were found in Mississippi in 1973 that differed by the “social chromosome” regulating the social form; the smaller queens of the polygynous form can reproduce and spread through budding. Although the monogynous form is dominant in the United States, both forms can participate in mating flights (Arsenault et al., <span>2020</span>; Kjeldgaard et al., <span>2022</span>; Tschinkel, <span>2013</span>). Colonies are omnivorous like other invasive ants and consume sugary food, mostly the honeydew of hemipterans. They also scavenge rather than being predatory and displace other ants through competition. Finally, it is considered one of the most costly invasive species worldwide, impacting natural ecosystems, agriculture, man-made structures, and human health (Chen et al., <span>2020</span>; Menchetti et al., <span>2023</span>; Tschinkel, <span>2013</span>).</p><p>In Florida, USA, the prevalence of both <i>P. megacephala</i> and <i>S. invicta</i> populations in certain invaded habitats makes it likely that these two dominant and invasive species encounter each other regularly (see Booher et al., <span>2023</span>), but the nature of their interactions has not been clarified. Knowledge about such interactions could elucidate how dominant invasive species co-exist and partition an environment.</p><p>The area studied is in a highly disturbed suburban environment located in the town center of a gated community in Poinciana, Florida. This area and its surroundings are overrun by several invasive species, including <i>P. megacephala</i>, <i>Pheidole</i> sp. cf. <i>parva</i>, and <i>S. invicta</i>. Ant specimens were placed in 91% isopropyl alcohol for later identification by Douglas B. Booher (USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Athens, GA 30602, USA). DNA was extracted for the identification of <i>Pheidole</i> sp. cf. <i>parva</i>, which is new to the area.</p><p>To determine the precise territory occupied by <i>P. megacephala</i>, we first located typical nest mounds or the semi-permanent trail networks of the species (see fig. 10 in Warner &amp; Scheffrahn, <span>2007</span>). Then, we placed baits (cookie crumbs, honey, and pieces of sausage) every 1–5 m to have an idea of the possible dimensions of the colony's territory. Finally, we transferred <i>P. megacephala</i> workers from the farthest points of the territory to confirm that they belonged to the same colony. Indeed, all transferred workers were accepted by resident individuals and generally followed the same paths and/or entered new nests unharmed. This territory covered an irregular area of two hectares, with the majority of the nest entrances situated along the town center's Village Drive (Appendix S1: Figure S1 on which we also noted the location of <i>S. invicta</i> mounds).</p><p>Aggressive interactions involving the <i>P. megacephala</i> colony and other ant species were noted during daily observations extending from June to November 2024. Special attention was paid to the periphery of the colony where contact between <i>P. megacephala</i> workers and other ant species was most common. Details of these interactions are described below.</p><p>In Florida, <i>P. megacephala</i> populations increased between 1965 and 2018 (see fig. S2 in Booher et al., <span>2023</span>), but concerning the size of the colonies' territory, we can only assert that there is no intraspecific aggressiveness between workers over 2 ha. Because we know that in Australia no aggressiveness was noted over 3000 km (Fournier et al., <span>2009</span>), complementary studies are needed to determine more precisely the size of their territories. However, we noted here that the colony studied is large enough to raid small ant colonies, confirming previous results (Dejean et al., <span>2008</span>; Dejean, Kenne, et al., <span>2007</span>), as well as the large <i>S. invicta</i> colonies, themselves invasive. We cannot exclude the possibility that, due to their large size, <i>S. invicta</i> colonies can limit the impact of these raids underground by sealing galleries, a method employed by the invasive subterranean Formosan termite, which is able to limit <i>P. megacephala</i>'s preying activity (Chouvenc et al., <span>2015</span>). Thus, further studies are needed to verify whether <i>P. megacephala</i> is able to destroy entire <i>S. invicta</i> colonies by raiding them.</p><p>In conclusion, for a predatory ant that raids other ant species, the larger the prey colony, the more profitable the raid. If by doing so the predator also extends its territory, as noted here, both predation and territoriality are involved. Rather than “interference competition,” this most closely resembles “intraguild predation” because the predator gains an energetic reward while reducing competition for space. Indeed, the two main species involved in this study belong to the same guild (large, omnivorous, ground-dwelling territorial colonies). <i>S. invicta</i> is a poor predator, while <i>P. megacephala</i> is one of the most effective ant predators as it is able to prey on other ants whatever their size and their venom composition, especially when its colonies reach a certain size.</p><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p>","PeriodicalId":11484,"journal":{"name":"Ecology","volume":"106 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecy.70113","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecy.70113","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The establishment and spread of many imported ant species are facilitated by a high level of reproduction, the future queens mating without nuptial flight so that the colonies reproduce through budding. The colonies are polygynous (i.e., multiple queens) and form unicolonial societies that spread over large areas and reach high densities, often outcompeting native ants through ecological dominance (Suarez et al., 2010; Wong et al., 2023).

These characteristics are present in the well-known invasive species Pheidole megacephala, or the big-headed ant, native to tropical Africa. Like most Pheidole species, its worker caste is dimorphic with small minors and big-headed majors or “soldiers,” both having small stingers that serve only to lay odor trails (Wilson, 2003). In its introduced range, this species forms large, unicolonial societies to the point that no intraspecific aggressiveness between workers was noted in different geographical areas of Australia over 3000 km (Fournier et al., 2009). Consequently, P. megacephala outcompetes native ants through interference competition and especially by raiding their colonies (Figure 1), a characteristic inherited from its native range that even permits it to resist the assault of army ants (Dejean et al., 2008, 2014; Dejean, Kenne, et al., 2007; Dejean, Moreau, et al., 2007; Sarnat et al., 2015; see Kamaru et al., 2024 for an indirect effect).

Unlike most other invasive ants, the red imported fire ant, Solenopsis invicta, is monogynous. Native to South America, it was imported into the United States in the 1930s around Mobile, Alabama. However, polygynous populations were found in Mississippi in 1973 that differed by the “social chromosome” regulating the social form; the smaller queens of the polygynous form can reproduce and spread through budding. Although the monogynous form is dominant in the United States, both forms can participate in mating flights (Arsenault et al., 2020; Kjeldgaard et al., 2022; Tschinkel, 2013). Colonies are omnivorous like other invasive ants and consume sugary food, mostly the honeydew of hemipterans. They also scavenge rather than being predatory and displace other ants through competition. Finally, it is considered one of the most costly invasive species worldwide, impacting natural ecosystems, agriculture, man-made structures, and human health (Chen et al., 2020; Menchetti et al., 2023; Tschinkel, 2013).

In Florida, USA, the prevalence of both P. megacephala and S. invicta populations in certain invaded habitats makes it likely that these two dominant and invasive species encounter each other regularly (see Booher et al., 2023), but the nature of their interactions has not been clarified. Knowledge about such interactions could elucidate how dominant invasive species co-exist and partition an environment.

The area studied is in a highly disturbed suburban environment located in the town center of a gated community in Poinciana, Florida. This area and its surroundings are overrun by several invasive species, including P. megacephala, Pheidole sp. cf. parva, and S. invicta. Ant specimens were placed in 91% isopropyl alcohol for later identification by Douglas B. Booher (USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Athens, GA 30602, USA). DNA was extracted for the identification of Pheidole sp. cf. parva, which is new to the area.

To determine the precise territory occupied by P. megacephala, we first located typical nest mounds or the semi-permanent trail networks of the species (see fig. 10 in Warner & Scheffrahn, 2007). Then, we placed baits (cookie crumbs, honey, and pieces of sausage) every 1–5 m to have an idea of the possible dimensions of the colony's territory. Finally, we transferred P. megacephala workers from the farthest points of the territory to confirm that they belonged to the same colony. Indeed, all transferred workers were accepted by resident individuals and generally followed the same paths and/or entered new nests unharmed. This territory covered an irregular area of two hectares, with the majority of the nest entrances situated along the town center's Village Drive (Appendix S1: Figure S1 on which we also noted the location of S. invicta mounds).

Aggressive interactions involving the P. megacephala colony and other ant species were noted during daily observations extending from June to November 2024. Special attention was paid to the periphery of the colony where contact between P. megacephala workers and other ant species was most common. Details of these interactions are described below.

In Florida, P. megacephala populations increased between 1965 and 2018 (see fig. S2 in Booher et al., 2023), but concerning the size of the colonies' territory, we can only assert that there is no intraspecific aggressiveness between workers over 2 ha. Because we know that in Australia no aggressiveness was noted over 3000 km (Fournier et al., 2009), complementary studies are needed to determine more precisely the size of their territories. However, we noted here that the colony studied is large enough to raid small ant colonies, confirming previous results (Dejean et al., 2008; Dejean, Kenne, et al., 2007), as well as the large S. invicta colonies, themselves invasive. We cannot exclude the possibility that, due to their large size, S. invicta colonies can limit the impact of these raids underground by sealing galleries, a method employed by the invasive subterranean Formosan termite, which is able to limit P. megacephala's preying activity (Chouvenc et al., 2015). Thus, further studies are needed to verify whether P. megacephala is able to destroy entire S. invicta colonies by raiding them.

In conclusion, for a predatory ant that raids other ant species, the larger the prey colony, the more profitable the raid. If by doing so the predator also extends its territory, as noted here, both predation and territoriality are involved. Rather than “interference competition,” this most closely resembles “intraguild predation” because the predator gains an energetic reward while reducing competition for space. Indeed, the two main species involved in this study belong to the same guild (large, omnivorous, ground-dwelling territorial colonies). S. invicta is a poor predator, while P. megacephala is one of the most effective ant predators as it is able to prey on other ants whatever their size and their venom composition, especially when its colonies reach a certain size.

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abstract Image

大头蚁:一种入侵蚂蚁,袭击红火蚁的殖民地
许多外来蚁种的建立和传播都是通过高水平的繁殖来促进的,未来的蚁后交配时不需要进行交配飞行,这样蚁群就可以通过出芽繁殖。蚁群是一夫多妻制的(即有多个蚁后),形成单殖民地社会,分布在大片地区,密度很高,通常通过生态优势胜过本地蚂蚁(Suarez et al., 2010;Wong et al., 2023)。这些特征存在于著名的入侵物种大头蚁(Pheidole megacephala)身上,它们原产于热带非洲。像大多数菲多物种一样,它的工蚁阶层是二态的,有小的小头和大的头或“士兵”,两者都有小的毒刺,只用于放置气味痕迹(威尔逊,2003)。在其引进范围内,该物种形成了大型的单种群社会,以至于在澳大利亚超过3000公里的不同地理区域内,工蜂之间没有发现种内侵略性(Fournier et al., 2009)。因此,P. megacephala通过干扰竞争,特别是通过袭击其蚁群(图1)来战胜本地蚂蚁,这一特征继承自其本地范围,甚至允许它抵抗军蚁的攻击(Dejean et al., 2008, 2014;Dejean, Kenne等,2007;Dejean, Moreau等,2007;Sarnat et al., 2015;间接影响见Kamaru et al., 2024)。与大多数其他入侵蚂蚁不同,红火蚁是一夫一妻制的。它原产于南美洲,于20世纪30年代在阿拉巴马州的莫比尔附近进口到美国。然而,1973年在密西西比州发现了一夫多妻制群体,其差异在于调节社会形态的“社会染色体”;较小的一夫多妻制蜂王可以通过出芽繁殖和传播。虽然一夫一妻制在美国占主导地位,但两种形式都可以参与交配飞行(Arsenault et al., 2020;Kjeldgaard et al., 2022;tschinke, 2013)。蚁群像其他入侵蚂蚁一样是杂食性的,吃含糖的食物,主要是半角蚁的蜜露。它们也是食腐动物,而不是掠食性动物,并通过竞争取代其他蚂蚁。最后,它被认为是世界上代价最高的入侵物种之一,影响自然生态系统、农业、人造结构和人类健康(Chen et al., 2020;Menchetti et al., 2023;tschinke, 2013)。在美国佛罗里达州,在某些被入侵的栖息地中,P. megacephala和S. invicta种群的流行使这两种优势物种和入侵物种可能经常相遇(见Booher等人,2023),但它们相互作用的性质尚未得到澄清。关于这种相互作用的知识可以阐明优势入侵物种是如何共存和划分环境的。所研究的区域位于佛罗里达州波因恰纳一个封闭社区的镇中心,是一个高度受干扰的郊区环境。该地区及其周边地区已被几种入侵物种侵占,包括P. megacephala, Pheidole sp. cfp . parva和S. invicta。蚂蚁标本放置在91%的异丙醇中,稍后由Douglas B. Booher(美国农业部林业局,南方研究站,Athens, GA 30602, USA)鉴定。提取DNA鉴定为该地区新发现的Pheidole sp. cf. parva。为了确定巨头鲨的确切领地,我们首先定位了典型的巢丘或该物种的半永久性足迹网络(见华纳&安普;Scheffrahn, 2007)。然后,我们每隔1-5米放置诱饵(饼干屑、蜂蜜和香肠片),以了解蚁群领土的可能尺寸。最后,我们从最远的地方转移了巨头鲸的工蜂,以确认它们属于同一个群体。事实上,所有被转移的工蚁都被居住的个体所接受,并且通常遵循相同的路径和/或安然无恙地进入新的巢穴。这片面积为两公顷的不规则区域,大多数巢穴的入口位于镇中心的村庄大道(附录S1:图S1中我们也注意到了s.a invicta土丘的位置)。在2024年6月至11月的日常观察中,发现了涉及P. megacephala群体和其他蚂蚁物种的攻击性相互作用。特别注意的是,在蚁群的外围,巨头蚁工蚁与其他蚁种的接触是最常见的。下面描述了这些交互的细节。在佛罗里达州,P. megacephala种群在1965年至2018年期间有所增加(见Booher等人,2023年的图S2),但关于殖民地领土的大小,我们只能断言,在2公顷以上的工蜂之间没有种内侵略性。因为我们知道在澳大利亚,超过3000公里没有发现侵略性(Fournier et al.)。 (2009年),需要进行补充研究,以更准确地确定其领土的大小。然而,我们在这里注意到,所研究的蚁群足够大,可以袭击小蚁群,证实了之前的结果(Dejean et al., 2008;Dejean, Kenne, et ., 2007),以及大型的invicta种群,它们本身也是入侵性的。我们不能排除这样一种可能性,即由于其庞大的规模,s.a invicta蚁群可以通过封闭通道来限制这些地下袭击的影响,这是入侵的地下台湾白蚁所采用的一种方法,能够限制P. megacephala的捕食活动(Chouvenc et al., 2015)。因此,需要进一步的研究来验证巨头棘球绦虫是否能够通过袭击来摧毁整个不可侵犯棘球绦虫群体。总而言之,对于捕食其他蚂蚁物种的蚂蚁来说,猎物群体越大,袭击的利润就越高。如果通过这样做,捕食者也扩大了它的领土,如这里所述,捕食和领土都涉及到。而不是“干扰竞争”,这更像是“野生动物内部捕食”,因为捕食者在减少空间竞争的同时获得了精力充沛的奖励。事实上,这项研究中涉及的两个主要物种属于同一个行会(大型、杂食性、地面居住的领土殖民地)。invicta是一种可怜的捕食者,而P. megacephala是最有效的蚂蚁捕食者之一,因为它能够捕食其他蚂蚁,无论它们的大小和毒液成分如何,尤其是当它的群体达到一定的规模时。作者声明无利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecology
Ecology 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
2.10%
发文量
332
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Ecology publishes articles that report on the basic elements of ecological research. Emphasis is placed on concise, clear articles documenting important ecological phenomena. The journal publishes a broad array of research that includes a rapidly expanding envelope of subject matter, techniques, approaches, and concepts: paleoecology through present-day phenomena; evolutionary, population, physiological, community, and ecosystem ecology, as well as biogeochemistry; inclusive of descriptive, comparative, experimental, mathematical, statistical, and interdisciplinary approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信