Mapping the Dynamics of Generalized Anxiety Symptoms and Actionable Transdiagnostic Mechanisms: A Panel Study

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Asle Hoffart, Nora Skjerdingstad, René Freichel, Sverre Urnes Johnson, Sacha Epskamp, Omid V. Ebrahimi
{"title":"Mapping the Dynamics of Generalized Anxiety Symptoms and Actionable Transdiagnostic Mechanisms: A Panel Study","authors":"Asle Hoffart,&nbsp;Nora Skjerdingstad,&nbsp;René Freichel,&nbsp;Sverre Urnes Johnson,&nbsp;Sacha Epskamp,&nbsp;Omid V. Ebrahimi","doi":"10.1155/da/1885004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><b>Background:</b> The long-term dynamic interaction between symptoms of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) and their theorized mechanistic processes derived from three treatment models of GAD—the emotion dysregulation model, the model underlying metacognitive therapy (MCT), and the intolerance of uncertainty model—was investigated.</p>\n <p><b>Methods:</b> Four data waves 2 months apart were delivered by a representative population sample of 4361 participants during the COVID-19 pandemic in Norway. Networks were estimated using the newly developed panel graphical vector autoregression (panel-GVAR) methods.</p>\n <p><b>Results:</b> In the temporal network, and consistent with processes stipulated in the metacognitive model, the experience that worry is uncontrollable predicted the GAD symptom fear of awful events, which in turn predicted a range of other GAD symptoms, that is, anxiety, restlessness, and irritability. Fear of awful events had high outstrength, that is, predicted other variables to a large degree. Inconsistent with the metacognitive model, the coping strategy thought suppression negatively predicted restlessness. Consistent with the emotion dysregulation model, emotion dysregulation predicted avoidance. No relationships proposed by the intolerance of uncertainty model of GAD were identified in the temporal network. The contemporaneous network was dense with nodes clustering according to the constructs they belonged to.</p>\n <p><b>Conclusions:</b> The findings indicate the importance of the theory-derived variables, the experience and belief that worry is uncontrollable and emotion dysregulation, as potential targets for intervention to alleviate GAD symptoms. The findings also indicate that uncontrollability of worry and fear of awful events should be considered central symptoms of GAD in a within-individual diagnostics supplementary to current diagnostic manuals, such as the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 5th edition (DSM-5).</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55179,"journal":{"name":"Depression and Anxiety","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/da/1885004","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Depression and Anxiety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/da/1885004","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The long-term dynamic interaction between symptoms of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) and their theorized mechanistic processes derived from three treatment models of GAD—the emotion dysregulation model, the model underlying metacognitive therapy (MCT), and the intolerance of uncertainty model—was investigated.

Methods: Four data waves 2 months apart were delivered by a representative population sample of 4361 participants during the COVID-19 pandemic in Norway. Networks were estimated using the newly developed panel graphical vector autoregression (panel-GVAR) methods.

Results: In the temporal network, and consistent with processes stipulated in the metacognitive model, the experience that worry is uncontrollable predicted the GAD symptom fear of awful events, which in turn predicted a range of other GAD symptoms, that is, anxiety, restlessness, and irritability. Fear of awful events had high outstrength, that is, predicted other variables to a large degree. Inconsistent with the metacognitive model, the coping strategy thought suppression negatively predicted restlessness. Consistent with the emotion dysregulation model, emotion dysregulation predicted avoidance. No relationships proposed by the intolerance of uncertainty model of GAD were identified in the temporal network. The contemporaneous network was dense with nodes clustering according to the constructs they belonged to.

Conclusions: The findings indicate the importance of the theory-derived variables, the experience and belief that worry is uncontrollable and emotion dysregulation, as potential targets for intervention to alleviate GAD symptoms. The findings also indicate that uncontrollability of worry and fear of awful events should be considered central symptoms of GAD in a within-individual diagnostics supplementary to current diagnostic manuals, such as the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 5th edition (DSM-5).

Abstract Image

广泛性焦虑症状的动态映射和可操作的跨诊断机制:一项小组研究
背景:从广泛性焦虑障碍(GAD)的三种治疗模式——情绪失调模型、元认知疗法(MCT)基础模型和不确定性耐受模型——衍生出的广泛性焦虑障碍(GAD)症状及其理论机制过程之间的长期动态相互作用进行了研究。方法:在挪威COVID-19大流行期间,4361名代表性人群样本提供了四个数据波,间隔2个月。使用新开发的面板图形向量自回归(panel- gvar)方法对网络进行估计。结果:在时间网络中,与元认知模型中规定的过程一致,担忧不可控制的经验预测了对可怕事件的恐惧症状,而恐惧症状反过来预测了一系列其他GAD症状,即焦虑、不安和易怒。对可怕事件的恐惧具有很高的优势,也就是说,在很大程度上预测了其他变量。与元认知模型不一致的是,应对策略思维抑制负向预测不安。与情绪失调模型一致,情绪失调预测回避。在时间网络中没有发现GAD不确定性不耐受模型提出的关系。同时网络是密集的,节点根据它们所属的结构聚类。结论:研究结果表明了理论衍生变量的重要性,即焦虑是不可控制的和情绪失调的经验和信念,作为干预减轻GAD症状的潜在目标。研究结果还表明,对可怕事件的担忧和恐惧的无法控制应该被视为广泛性焦虑症的核心症状,在现有诊断手册(如精神疾病诊断和统计手册第5版(DSM-5))的个人诊断中加以补充。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Depression and Anxiety
Depression and Anxiety 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
15.00
自引率
1.40%
发文量
81
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Depression and Anxiety is a scientific journal that focuses on the study of mood and anxiety disorders, as well as related phenomena in humans. The journal is dedicated to publishing high-quality research and review articles that contribute to the understanding and treatment of these conditions. The journal places a particular emphasis on articles that contribute to the clinical evaluation and care of individuals affected by mood and anxiety disorders. It prioritizes the publication of treatment-related research and review papers, as well as those that present novel findings that can directly impact clinical practice. The journal's goal is to advance the field by disseminating knowledge that can lead to better diagnosis, treatment, and management of these disorders, ultimately improving the quality of life for those who suffer from them.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信