Exposure to Psychosocial Work Factors and Occupational Injury and Its Severity: Prospective Associations Among Employees in the French National Working Conditions Survey

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Sandrine Bertrais, Isabelle Niedhammer
{"title":"Exposure to Psychosocial Work Factors and Occupational Injury and Its Severity: Prospective Associations Among Employees in the French National Working Conditions Survey","authors":"Sandrine Bertrais,&nbsp;Isabelle Niedhammer","doi":"10.1002/ajim.23723","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The few prospective studies on the associations between psychosocial work factors and occupational injury in the general working population provide little information on multiple exposures, injury severity, and gender differences. This study aimed to address these points.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The study was based on prospective data from the nationwide Working Conditions survey on a representative sample of the working population in France. A total of 17,486 employees (7302 men, 10,184 women) were followed over one or two 3-year periods from 2013 to 2019. Occupational exposures were measured at the beginning of each period and included 20 psychosocial work factors, 4 working time/hours factors, and 4 physical work factors. Logistic and Hurdle models were used to study their prospective associations with occupational injury and its severity, as assessed by work absence due to injury and its duration.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Most psychosocial work factors predicted occupational injury. Almost all associations persisted in adjusted models, that is, after controlling for covariates and the other occupational factors that were also predictive of occupational injury. No gender differences were found for these prospective associations. For all types of occupational factors, dose–response associations were found between the number of exposures and injury. However, most occupational factors were not predictive of injury severity.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Occupational exposures, and psychosocial work factors in particular, predicted the occurrence of occupational injury more than its severity. Occupational injury prevention programmes should focus on various aspects of the work environment, including psychosocial work factors, and should particularly target multiple exposures.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":7873,"journal":{"name":"American journal of industrial medicine","volume":"68 6","pages":"543-551"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajim.23723","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of industrial medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajim.23723","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The few prospective studies on the associations between psychosocial work factors and occupational injury in the general working population provide little information on multiple exposures, injury severity, and gender differences. This study aimed to address these points.

Methods

The study was based on prospective data from the nationwide Working Conditions survey on a representative sample of the working population in France. A total of 17,486 employees (7302 men, 10,184 women) were followed over one or two 3-year periods from 2013 to 2019. Occupational exposures were measured at the beginning of each period and included 20 psychosocial work factors, 4 working time/hours factors, and 4 physical work factors. Logistic and Hurdle models were used to study their prospective associations with occupational injury and its severity, as assessed by work absence due to injury and its duration.

Results

Most psychosocial work factors predicted occupational injury. Almost all associations persisted in adjusted models, that is, after controlling for covariates and the other occupational factors that were also predictive of occupational injury. No gender differences were found for these prospective associations. For all types of occupational factors, dose–response associations were found between the number of exposures and injury. However, most occupational factors were not predictive of injury severity.

Conclusions

Occupational exposures, and psychosocial work factors in particular, predicted the occurrence of occupational injury more than its severity. Occupational injury prevention programmes should focus on various aspects of the work environment, including psychosocial work factors, and should particularly target multiple exposures.

暴露于社会心理工作因素和职业伤害及其严重程度:在法国国家工作条件调查中雇员的前瞻性关联
背景:在一般工作人群中,关于社会心理工作因素与职业伤害之间关系的前瞻性研究很少提供关于多重暴露、伤害严重程度和性别差异的信息。本研究旨在解决这些问题。方法本研究基于法国全国工作条件调查的前瞻性数据,调查对象为具有代表性的工作人口样本。从2013年到2019年,共有17486名员工(7302名男性,10184名女性)在一到两个三年的时间里接受了跟踪调查。在每个时期开始测量职业暴露,包括20个心理社会工作因素、4个工作时间/小时因素和4个体力工作因素。使用Logistic和障碍模型来研究他们与职业伤害及其严重程度的潜在关联,评估工伤缺勤及其持续时间。结果社会心理因素对职业伤害的预测作用较大。在调整后的模型中,也就是说,在控制了协变量和其他也能预测职业伤害的职业因素之后,几乎所有的关联都存在。这些前瞻性关联没有发现性别差异。对于所有类型的职业因素,在暴露次数和伤害之间发现了剂量-反应关联。然而,大多数职业因素不能预测损伤严重程度。结论职业暴露尤其是心理社会因素对职业伤害发生的预测作用大于其严重程度。职业伤害预防规划应侧重于工作环境的各个方面,包括社会心理工作因素,并应特别针对多重暴露。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of industrial medicine
American journal of industrial medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
5.70%
发文量
108
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: American Journal of Industrial Medicine considers for publication reports of original research, review articles, instructive case reports, and analyses of policy in the fields of occupational and environmental health and safety. The Journal also accepts commentaries, book reviews and letters of comment and criticism. The goals of the journal are to advance and disseminate knowledge, promote research and foster the prevention of disease and injury. Specific topics of interest include: occupational disease; environmental disease; pesticides; cancer; occupational epidemiology; environmental epidemiology; disease surveillance systems; ergonomics; dust diseases; lead poisoning; neurotoxicology; endocrine disruptors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信