Examining uncertainties in major-ion reconstructions of seawater from halite fluid inclusions

IF 10 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Clara L. Blättler
{"title":"Examining uncertainties in major-ion reconstructions of seawater from halite fluid inclusions","authors":"Clara L. Blättler","doi":"10.1016/j.earscirev.2025.105142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Fluid inclusions of evaporitic brines within halite deposits are one of our most valuable records for reconstructing seawater composition over geological timescales. They have been used to generate estimates of major element and even some trace element concentrations in seawater over time; these reconstructions are widely used as constraints for a variety of applications. The uncertainties in this method of paleoseawater reconstruction are well known to those who perform the measurements and generate the reconstructions, but are not commonly appreciated outside of the community that works on halite fluid inclusions. This contribution seeks to critically examine those uncertainties and highlight the artifacts that exist within familiar seawater reconstructions. The greatest uncertainties stem from the assumption that gypsum saturation has remained constant, which affects reconstructed calcium and sulfate concentrations. The reconstructed magnesium record also shows unrealistic levels of scatter and is likely unreliable, and this scatter is transferred to reconstructed sodium concentrations because of how the requirement of charge balance is handled. Independent proxy constraints on aspects of seawater chemistry are subject to their own assumptions and uncertainties and are generally not precise enough to offer robust alternative reconstructions. However, an alternative approach that uses the fluid inclusion record in a more limited way, along with calibrated stoichiometric relationships among major ions over the Neogene, shows some promise and should be explored further. It is possible that future work combining the most robust features of the fluid inclusion record, new independent constraints on major ion concentrations, and reasonable ion-exchange reactions or reaction networks could be used to develop improved estimates for major-ion concentrations in seawater over Earth history. Despite the weaknesses of the fluid inclusion archive, it remains at present the source of our best available constraints for the secular evolution of seawater chemistry, but it should also be used carefully and with awareness of its inherent uncertainties.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11483,"journal":{"name":"Earth-Science Reviews","volume":"267 ","pages":"Article 105142"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth-Science Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012825225001035","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fluid inclusions of evaporitic brines within halite deposits are one of our most valuable records for reconstructing seawater composition over geological timescales. They have been used to generate estimates of major element and even some trace element concentrations in seawater over time; these reconstructions are widely used as constraints for a variety of applications. The uncertainties in this method of paleoseawater reconstruction are well known to those who perform the measurements and generate the reconstructions, but are not commonly appreciated outside of the community that works on halite fluid inclusions. This contribution seeks to critically examine those uncertainties and highlight the artifacts that exist within familiar seawater reconstructions. The greatest uncertainties stem from the assumption that gypsum saturation has remained constant, which affects reconstructed calcium and sulfate concentrations. The reconstructed magnesium record also shows unrealistic levels of scatter and is likely unreliable, and this scatter is transferred to reconstructed sodium concentrations because of how the requirement of charge balance is handled. Independent proxy constraints on aspects of seawater chemistry are subject to their own assumptions and uncertainties and are generally not precise enough to offer robust alternative reconstructions. However, an alternative approach that uses the fluid inclusion record in a more limited way, along with calibrated stoichiometric relationships among major ions over the Neogene, shows some promise and should be explored further. It is possible that future work combining the most robust features of the fluid inclusion record, new independent constraints on major ion concentrations, and reasonable ion-exchange reactions or reaction networks could be used to develop improved estimates for major-ion concentrations in seawater over Earth history. Despite the weaknesses of the fluid inclusion archive, it remains at present the source of our best available constraints for the secular evolution of seawater chemistry, but it should also be used carefully and with awareness of its inherent uncertainties.
从岩盐流体包裹体中检测海水主要重建的不确定度
岩盐沉积中蒸发盐水的流体包裹体是我们在地质时间尺度上重建海水成分的最有价值的记录之一。它们被用来估算海水中随时间变化的主要元素甚至一些微量元素的浓度;这些重构被广泛用作各种应用的约束。这种古海水重建方法的不确定性对于进行测量和重建的人来说是众所周知的,但在研究岩盐流体包裹体的社区之外,人们通常不了解这种方法的不确定性。这篇文章试图批判性地审视这些不确定性,并强调在熟悉的海水重建中存在的人工制品。最大的不确定性源于石膏饱和度保持不变的假设,这影响了重建的钙和硫酸盐浓度。重建的镁记录也显示了不切实际的散射水平,并且可能不可靠,并且由于如何处理电荷平衡的要求,这种散射被转移到重建的钠浓度。海水化学方面的独立代理约束受制于它们自己的假设和不确定性,通常不够精确,无法提供可靠的替代重建。然而,另一种方法,即以更有限的方式使用流体包裹体记录,以及在新近纪主要离子之间校准的化学计量关系,显示出一些希望,应该进一步探索。未来的工作有可能结合流体包裹体记录的最强大特征、对主要离子浓度的新的独立约束以及合理的离子交换反应或反应网络,来改进对地球历史上海水中主要离子浓度的估计。尽管流体包裹体档案存在缺陷,但它仍然是目前我们对海水化学长期演化的最佳限制来源,但也应谨慎使用,并意识到其固有的不确定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Earth-Science Reviews
Earth-Science Reviews 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
21.70
自引率
5.80%
发文量
294
审稿时长
15.1 weeks
期刊介绍: Covering a much wider field than the usual specialist journals, Earth Science Reviews publishes review articles dealing with all aspects of Earth Sciences, and is an important vehicle for allowing readers to see their particular interest related to the Earth Sciences as a whole.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信