Measles-mumps-rubella booster and post-COVID-19 immunity: A retrospective cohort study

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Ladislav Štěpánek , Marie Nakládalová , Alena Boriková , Dagmar Horáková , Lubomír Štěpánek , Renata Večeřová , Pavel Sauer
{"title":"Measles-mumps-rubella booster and post-COVID-19 immunity: A retrospective cohort study","authors":"Ladislav Štěpánek ,&nbsp;Marie Nakládalová ,&nbsp;Alena Boriková ,&nbsp;Dagmar Horáková ,&nbsp;Lubomír Štěpánek ,&nbsp;Renata Večeřová ,&nbsp;Pavel Sauer","doi":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2025.127232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The potential cross-protective effect of measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccination against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is debated. Although immunological studies suggest cross-reactivity between MMR-induced immunity and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), epidemiological evidence remains inconclusive. This study examined the association between an additional MMR dose and both COVID-19 clinical and serological outcomes in an adult cohort with verified pre-pandemic measles immunity.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In 2019, prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, 3027 healthcare workers from a Czech university hospital underwent measles serology testing. Seronegative individuals were offered a single additional MMR dose. Between 2020 and 2021, 261 individuals from the original sample subsequently contracted COVID-19 and underwent post-infection SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin G (IgG) serology testing, having remained unvaccinated against COVID-19 until that time.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 212 women and 49 men (mean age: 42.7 years), 150 were measles-seropositive (without additional vaccination) and 111 were measles-seronegative but received an additional MMR dose. Following COVID-19, 216 participants (82.8 %) exhibited SARS-CoV-2 IgG seropositivity. No significant relationship was observed between measles immunity or MMR vaccine administration and COVID-19 clinical characteristics. However, individuals who received an additional MMR dose were significantly more likely to develop SARS-CoV-2 IgG seropositivity (88.3 % vs. 78.7 %; <em>p</em> = 0.042). Regression analysis confirmed additional MMR vaccination as an independent predictor of post-COVID-19 seropositivity (odds ratio 1.81, 95 % confidence interval 1.17–2.81, <em>p</em> = 0.008), irrespective of the interval between MMR vaccination and COVID-19 symptom onset. No correlation was found between pre-pandemic measles antibody titers and SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels (<em>r</em> = 0.09, <em>p</em> = 0.246).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>While no protective effect of adult MMR vaccination on COVID-19 clinical outcomes was observed, a significant immunological interaction was identified. These findings align with the concept of trained immunity and warrant further investigation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23491,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine","volume":"57 ","pages":"Article 127232"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vaccine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X25005298","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The potential cross-protective effect of measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccination against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is debated. Although immunological studies suggest cross-reactivity between MMR-induced immunity and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), epidemiological evidence remains inconclusive. This study examined the association between an additional MMR dose and both COVID-19 clinical and serological outcomes in an adult cohort with verified pre-pandemic measles immunity.

Methods

In 2019, prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, 3027 healthcare workers from a Czech university hospital underwent measles serology testing. Seronegative individuals were offered a single additional MMR dose. Between 2020 and 2021, 261 individuals from the original sample subsequently contracted COVID-19 and underwent post-infection SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin G (IgG) serology testing, having remained unvaccinated against COVID-19 until that time.

Results

Among 212 women and 49 men (mean age: 42.7 years), 150 were measles-seropositive (without additional vaccination) and 111 were measles-seronegative but received an additional MMR dose. Following COVID-19, 216 participants (82.8 %) exhibited SARS-CoV-2 IgG seropositivity. No significant relationship was observed between measles immunity or MMR vaccine administration and COVID-19 clinical characteristics. However, individuals who received an additional MMR dose were significantly more likely to develop SARS-CoV-2 IgG seropositivity (88.3 % vs. 78.7 %; p = 0.042). Regression analysis confirmed additional MMR vaccination as an independent predictor of post-COVID-19 seropositivity (odds ratio 1.81, 95 % confidence interval 1.17–2.81, p = 0.008), irrespective of the interval between MMR vaccination and COVID-19 symptom onset. No correlation was found between pre-pandemic measles antibody titers and SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels (r = 0.09, p = 0.246).

Conclusion

While no protective effect of adult MMR vaccination on COVID-19 clinical outcomes was observed, a significant immunological interaction was identified. These findings align with the concept of trained immunity and warrant further investigation.
麻疹-腮腺炎-风疹增强剂和covid -19后免疫:一项回顾性队列研究
麻疹、腮腺炎和风疹(MMR)疫苗接种对2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的潜在交叉保护作用一直存在争议。尽管免疫学研究表明mmr诱导的免疫与严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2 (SARS-CoV-2)之间存在交叉反应性,但流行病学证据仍不确定。本研究在已证实具有大流行前麻疹免疫的成年队列中研究了额外MMR剂量与COVID-19临床和血清学结果之间的关系。方法2019年,在COVID-19大流行之前,捷克一家大学医院的3027名医护人员接受了麻疹血清学检测。血清阴性个体被给予单次额外的MMR剂量。在2020年至2021年期间,原始样本中的261人随后感染了COVID-19,并在感染后接受了SARS-CoV-2免疫球蛋白G (IgG)血清学检测,直到那时仍未接种COVID-19疫苗。结果在212名女性和49名男性(平均年龄:42.7岁)中,150名麻疹血清阳性(未额外接种),111名麻疹血清阴性但接受了额外的MMR剂量。在COVID-19之后,216名参与者(82.8%)表现出SARS-CoV-2 IgG血清阳性。麻疹免疫或MMR疫苗接种与COVID-19临床特征无显著关系。然而,接受额外MMR剂量的个体更有可能出现SARS-CoV-2 IgG血清阳性(88.3% vs. 78.7%;p = 0.042)。回归分析证实,额外接种MMR疫苗是COVID-19后血清阳性的独立预测因子(优势比1.81,95%置信区间1.17-2.81,p = 0.008),与接种MMR疫苗与COVID-19症状发作之间的间隔无关。大流行前麻疹抗体滴度与SARS-CoV-2抗体水平无相关性(r = 0.09, p = 0.246)。结论成人MMR疫苗接种对COVID-19临床结局无保护作用,但存在显著的免疫相互作用。这些发现与训练有素的免疫概念一致,值得进一步调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Vaccine
Vaccine 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
5.50%
发文量
992
审稿时长
131 days
期刊介绍: Vaccine is unique in publishing the highest quality science across all disciplines relevant to the field of vaccinology - all original article submissions across basic and clinical research, vaccine manufacturing, history, public policy, behavioral science and ethics, social sciences, safety, and many other related areas are welcomed. The submission categories as given in the Guide for Authors indicate where we receive the most papers. Papers outside these major areas are also welcome and authors are encouraged to contact us with specific questions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信