Population base rates as anchors in social categorization under uncertainty1

IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Antonio G. Viera, Robert J. Rydell, Kurt Hugenberg, Edward R. Hirt
{"title":"Population base rates as anchors in social categorization under uncertainty1","authors":"Antonio G. Viera,&nbsp;Robert J. Rydell,&nbsp;Kurt Hugenberg,&nbsp;Edward R. Hirt","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2025.104760","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>People often underutilize the numerical minority group when determining category membership of individuals into perceptually ambiguous social categories (i.e., groups whose members are relatively difficult to accurately identify based on visual information). We find that perceived population base rates can underlie this bias and influence social categorization even when stimulus set base rates are equated. We also provide evidence for an anchoring account to explain this bias. In Experiments 1 and 2, lower experimenter-provided population base rates of the minority group led to reduced utilization of the minority group, while higher base rates increased utilization. In Experiment 3, self-generated population base rates produced the same result and mediated the effect of anchors on categorization. An additional study suggests that anchoring on population base rates is unintentional, and that people insufficiently adjust toward stimulus set base rates. These findings highlight the importance of population base rates in categorizing members of perceptually ambiguous social groups.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48441,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","volume":"119 ","pages":"Article 104760"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022103125000411","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

People often underutilize the numerical minority group when determining category membership of individuals into perceptually ambiguous social categories (i.e., groups whose members are relatively difficult to accurately identify based on visual information). We find that perceived population base rates can underlie this bias and influence social categorization even when stimulus set base rates are equated. We also provide evidence for an anchoring account to explain this bias. In Experiments 1 and 2, lower experimenter-provided population base rates of the minority group led to reduced utilization of the minority group, while higher base rates increased utilization. In Experiment 3, self-generated population base rates produced the same result and mediated the effect of anchors on categorization. An additional study suggests that anchoring on population base rates is unintentional, and that people insufficiently adjust toward stimulus set base rates. These findings highlight the importance of population base rates in categorizing members of perceptually ambiguous social groups.
不确定条件下社会分类的人口基数锚点研究
在确定个体在感知上模糊的社会类别(即,其成员相对难以根据视觉信息准确识别的群体)中的类别成员时,人们往往没有充分利用数量上的少数群体。我们发现,即使在刺激设定的基本利率相等的情况下,感知到的人口基本利率也可能成为这种偏见的基础,并影响社会分类。我们还为锚定帐户提供证据来解释这种偏见。在实验1和2中,较低的实验者提供的少数群体人口基数率导致少数群体的利用率降低,而较高的基数率则增加了利用率。在实验3中,自生种群基础率产生了相同的结果,并介导锚点对分类的影响。另一项研究表明,锚定人口基本利率是无意的,人们没有充分调整刺激设定的基本利率。这些发现强调了人口基本比率在分类感知上模糊的社会群体成员中的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
2.90%
发文量
134
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Social Psychology publishes original research and theory on human social behavior and related phenomena. The journal emphasizes empirical, conceptually based research that advances an understanding of important social psychological processes. The journal also publishes literature reviews, theoretical analyses, and methodological comments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信