Supportive school strategies for sexually and gender diverse students: A meta-analysis of the associations with bullying-victimization experiences and feelings of school safety
Ruby van Vliet , Rozemarijn van der Ploeg , Tina Kretschmer , Wouter J. Kiekens , Laura Baams
{"title":"Supportive school strategies for sexually and gender diverse students: A meta-analysis of the associations with bullying-victimization experiences and feelings of school safety","authors":"Ruby van Vliet , Rozemarijn van der Ploeg , Tina Kretschmer , Wouter J. Kiekens , Laura Baams","doi":"10.1016/j.edurev.2025.100689","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Sexually and gender-diverse secondary school students experience more bullying-victimization and feel less safe at school than their heterosexual, cisgender peers. Therefore, clarifying the associations of various LGBTQ-targeted school-based strategies (enumerated policies, school-staff training, inclusive curriculum, GSAs) with these school experiences is crucial. Furthermore, it is important to determine who benefits most from these strategies and how differences in study characteristics affect findings. We used a multivariate meta-analytic model with an approximated variance-covariance matrix to investigate the associations between LGBTQ-targeted school-based strategies and both outcomes: students’ bullying-victimization experiences and school safety feelings. Our findings showed that students in secondary schools with LGBTQ-targeted strategies reported lower bullying-victimization and higher feelings of school safety, although the associations were modest. While these strategies seemed to benefit sexually and gender diverse students more and thus seem to help reduce the disparities, students of color seemed to benefit less. Furthermore, compared to research reports, peer-reviewed studies showed more variability across multiple outcomes, such as types of victimization or student sub-groups. A notable research gap exists regarding the role of school-staff training in relation to these outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48125,"journal":{"name":"Educational Research Review","volume":"47 ","pages":"Article 100689"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Research Review","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1747938X25000260","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Sexually and gender-diverse secondary school students experience more bullying-victimization and feel less safe at school than their heterosexual, cisgender peers. Therefore, clarifying the associations of various LGBTQ-targeted school-based strategies (enumerated policies, school-staff training, inclusive curriculum, GSAs) with these school experiences is crucial. Furthermore, it is important to determine who benefits most from these strategies and how differences in study characteristics affect findings. We used a multivariate meta-analytic model with an approximated variance-covariance matrix to investigate the associations between LGBTQ-targeted school-based strategies and both outcomes: students’ bullying-victimization experiences and school safety feelings. Our findings showed that students in secondary schools with LGBTQ-targeted strategies reported lower bullying-victimization and higher feelings of school safety, although the associations were modest. While these strategies seemed to benefit sexually and gender diverse students more and thus seem to help reduce the disparities, students of color seemed to benefit less. Furthermore, compared to research reports, peer-reviewed studies showed more variability across multiple outcomes, such as types of victimization or student sub-groups. A notable research gap exists regarding the role of school-staff training in relation to these outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Educational Research Review is an international journal catering to researchers and diverse agencies keen on reviewing studies and theoretical papers in education at any level. The journal welcomes high-quality articles that address educational research problems through a review approach, encompassing thematic or methodological reviews and meta-analyses. With an inclusive scope, the journal does not limit itself to any specific age range and invites articles across various settings where learning and education take place, such as schools, corporate training, and both formal and informal educational environments.