A systematic review of direct oral anticoagulants for thromboprophylaxis in multiple myeloma

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Cătălina Codreanu , Tessa Elling , Nic J.G. M. Veeger , Wilfried W.H. Roeloffzen , Karina Meijer
{"title":"A systematic review of direct oral anticoagulants for thromboprophylaxis in multiple myeloma","authors":"Cătălina Codreanu ,&nbsp;Tessa Elling ,&nbsp;Nic J.G. M. Veeger ,&nbsp;Wilfried W.H. Roeloffzen ,&nbsp;Karina Meijer","doi":"10.1016/j.rpth.2025.102865","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Multiple myeloma (MM) is associated with increased venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk. Current guidelines recommend aspirin or low-molecular-weight heparin for thromboprophylaxis depending on VTE risk. Nevertheless, VTE risks remain high: a recent meta-analysis reported an incidence of 6.2% during the entire MM course. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) showed promising results in other malignancies. This systematic review provides an overview of evidence on DOAC thromboprophylaxis in MM. PubMed and Embase were searched up to November 21, 2023, for studies evaluating MM and DOAC thromboprophylaxis (PROSPERO: CRD42022376152). Two authors independently screened titles, abstracts, and texts, assessed bias using a modified version of the Newcastle Ottawa Scale and certainty of evidence with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach, and performed data extraction and analysis. Seven articles comprising 416 patients with DOAC thromboprophylaxis were included, primarily involving newly diagnosed patients with MM (56.3%) receiving lenalidomide-based regimens (69.1%). Overall Newcastle Ottawa Scale study quality was moderate. Four studies reported follow-up duration ranging from 90 days after induction to 7 months. VTE proportions ranged from 0% to 23.5%, with 4 studies reporting 0%. The proportions of minor, clinically relevant nonmajor, and major bleeding ranged from 0% to 18.2%, 0% to 7.7%, and 0% to 4.5%, respectively. Arterial thrombosis proportions ranged from 0% to 2.9%. Only 2 studies reported on mortality (2% and 7.1%). Overall Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation certainty of evidence was very low for all outcomes. Current evidence regarding routine DOACs in MM is insufficient, warranting further research to establish the DOAC thromboprophylaxis risk-to-benefit ratio in MM.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20893,"journal":{"name":"Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis","volume":"9 3","pages":"Article 102865"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S247503792500189X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Multiple myeloma (MM) is associated with increased venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk. Current guidelines recommend aspirin or low-molecular-weight heparin for thromboprophylaxis depending on VTE risk. Nevertheless, VTE risks remain high: a recent meta-analysis reported an incidence of 6.2% during the entire MM course. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) showed promising results in other malignancies. This systematic review provides an overview of evidence on DOAC thromboprophylaxis in MM. PubMed and Embase were searched up to November 21, 2023, for studies evaluating MM and DOAC thromboprophylaxis (PROSPERO: CRD42022376152). Two authors independently screened titles, abstracts, and texts, assessed bias using a modified version of the Newcastle Ottawa Scale and certainty of evidence with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach, and performed data extraction and analysis. Seven articles comprising 416 patients with DOAC thromboprophylaxis were included, primarily involving newly diagnosed patients with MM (56.3%) receiving lenalidomide-based regimens (69.1%). Overall Newcastle Ottawa Scale study quality was moderate. Four studies reported follow-up duration ranging from 90 days after induction to 7 months. VTE proportions ranged from 0% to 23.5%, with 4 studies reporting 0%. The proportions of minor, clinically relevant nonmajor, and major bleeding ranged from 0% to 18.2%, 0% to 7.7%, and 0% to 4.5%, respectively. Arterial thrombosis proportions ranged from 0% to 2.9%. Only 2 studies reported on mortality (2% and 7.1%). Overall Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation certainty of evidence was very low for all outcomes. Current evidence regarding routine DOACs in MM is insufficient, warranting further research to establish the DOAC thromboprophylaxis risk-to-benefit ratio in MM.
直接口服抗凝剂用于多发性骨髓瘤血栓预防的系统综述
多发性骨髓瘤(MM)与静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)风险增加有关。目前的指南根据静脉血栓栓塞风险推荐阿司匹林或低分子肝素用于血栓预防。然而,静脉血栓栓塞的风险仍然很高:最近的一项荟萃分析报告,在整个MM病程中,静脉血栓栓塞的发生率为6.2%。直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)在其他恶性肿瘤中显示出良好的效果。本系统综述提供了DOAC在MM中血栓预防的证据概述。PubMed和Embase检索了截至2023年11月21日评估MM和DOAC血栓预防的研究(PROSPERO: CRD42022376152)。两位作者独立筛选标题、摘要和文本,使用修改版本的纽卡斯尔渥太华量表评估偏倚,采用建议分级评估、发展和评估方法评估证据的确定性,并进行数据提取和分析。纳入了7篇文章,包括416例DOAC血栓预防患者,主要涉及新诊断的MM患者(56.3%),接受来那度胺为基础的方案(69.1%)。总体而言,纽卡斯尔渥太华量表的研究质量为中等。4项研究报告随访时间从诱导后90天到7个月不等。静脉血栓栓塞的比例从0%到23.5%不等,有4项研究报告为0%。轻微出血、临床相关非大出血和大出血的比例分别为0% ~ 18.2%、0% ~ 7.7%和0% ~ 4.5%。动脉血栓比例为0% ~ 2.9%。只有2项研究报告了死亡率(2%和7.1%)。所有结果的评价、发展和评价证据的确定性都很低。目前关于MM常规DOAC的证据不足,需要进一步研究以确定MM的DOAC血栓预防风险-收益比。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
13.00%
发文量
212
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信