{"title":"Evolutionary behavior of bed materials in oxygen Carrier–Aided combustion of biomass","authors":"Ma Jinchen, Mi Yingjie, Zhao Haibo","doi":"10.1016/j.joei.2025.102124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The application of oxygen carrier–aided combustion (OCAC), referring to partial or complete substitution of conventional inert bed materials with oxygen carriers (OCs), in a circulating fluidized bed (CFB) offers advantages such as uniform distribution of temperature and oxygen (lattice and gaseous), potentially decreasing CO, CH<sub>4</sub>, and NO emissions in flue gas. In this study, pine wood chips were employed as the fuel source, while natural hematite was utilized as the OC. The effects of OC proportion (<em>Φ</em> = 25 %, 50 %, 75 %, and 100 %) and air-to-fuel ratio (<em>λ</em> = 1.0 and 1.1) on OCAC performance were evaluated in a 0.5 kW<sub>th</sub> fluidized bed reactor operated for 30 h. The effects of lattice oxygen (provided by OCs) and gaseous oxygen (in the air) on CO<sub>2</sub> yield and combustion efficiency were assessed. The results indicated that the inclusion of OCs significantly decreased CO, CH<sub>4</sub>, and NO emissions, with CO and CH<sub>4</sub> emissions declining by 55.59 % ± 5.32 % and 55.98 % ± 5.96 % respectively, at <em>λ</em> = 1.0, and NO conversion declining from 1.9 % ± 0.18 % (100 wt% SiO<sub>2</sub>) to 0.89 % ± 0.09 % (50 wt% Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>). The highest CO<sub>2</sub> gas yield (89.45 % ± 1.05 %) and combustion efficiency (82.98 % ± 1.22 %) were achieved at <em>λ</em> = 1.1 and <em>Φ</em> = 75 %. Notably, OCAC performance gradually diminished with increased operating time of the CFB boiler, which was attributed to the detrimental effect of biomass ash. The used OC was entirely encased within biomass ash, creating an ash shell structure that blocked OC particle pores and negatively affected gas–solid contact.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17287,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The Energy Institute","volume":"121 ","pages":"Article 102124"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The Energy Institute","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1743967125001527","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The application of oxygen carrier–aided combustion (OCAC), referring to partial or complete substitution of conventional inert bed materials with oxygen carriers (OCs), in a circulating fluidized bed (CFB) offers advantages such as uniform distribution of temperature and oxygen (lattice and gaseous), potentially decreasing CO, CH4, and NO emissions in flue gas. In this study, pine wood chips were employed as the fuel source, while natural hematite was utilized as the OC. The effects of OC proportion (Φ = 25 %, 50 %, 75 %, and 100 %) and air-to-fuel ratio (λ = 1.0 and 1.1) on OCAC performance were evaluated in a 0.5 kWth fluidized bed reactor operated for 30 h. The effects of lattice oxygen (provided by OCs) and gaseous oxygen (in the air) on CO2 yield and combustion efficiency were assessed. The results indicated that the inclusion of OCs significantly decreased CO, CH4, and NO emissions, with CO and CH4 emissions declining by 55.59 % ± 5.32 % and 55.98 % ± 5.96 % respectively, at λ = 1.0, and NO conversion declining from 1.9 % ± 0.18 % (100 wt% SiO2) to 0.89 % ± 0.09 % (50 wt% Fe2O3). The highest CO2 gas yield (89.45 % ± 1.05 %) and combustion efficiency (82.98 % ± 1.22 %) were achieved at λ = 1.1 and Φ = 75 %. Notably, OCAC performance gradually diminished with increased operating time of the CFB boiler, which was attributed to the detrimental effect of biomass ash. The used OC was entirely encased within biomass ash, creating an ash shell structure that blocked OC particle pores and negatively affected gas–solid contact.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of the Energy Institute provides peer reviewed coverage of original high quality research on energy, engineering and technology.The coverage is broad and the main areas of interest include:
Combustion engineering and associated technologies; process heating; power generation; engines and propulsion; emissions and environmental pollution control; clean coal technologies; carbon abatement technologies
Emissions and environmental pollution control; safety and hazards;
Clean coal technologies; carbon abatement technologies, including carbon capture and storage, CCS;
Petroleum engineering and fuel quality, including storage and transport
Alternative energy sources; biomass utilisation and biomass conversion technologies; energy from waste, incineration and recycling
Energy conversion, energy recovery and energy efficiency; space heating, fuel cells, heat pumps and cooling systems
Energy storage
The journal''s coverage reflects changes in energy technology that result from the transition to more efficient energy production and end use together with reduced carbon emission.