Evaluating advanced AI reasoning models: ChatGPT-4.0 and DeepSeek-R1 diagnostic performance in otolaryngology: a comparative analysis

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Soumil Prasad, Jake Langlie, Luke Pasick, Ryan Chen, Elizabeth Franzmann
{"title":"Evaluating advanced AI reasoning models: ChatGPT-4.0 and DeepSeek-R1 diagnostic performance in otolaryngology: a comparative analysis","authors":"Soumil Prasad,&nbsp;Jake Langlie,&nbsp;Luke Pasick,&nbsp;Ryan Chen,&nbsp;Elizabeth Franzmann","doi":"10.1016/j.amjoto.2025.104667","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy, comprehensiveness, and clinical relevance of two advanced artificial intelligence (AI) models, OpenAI's ChatGPT-4.0 and DeepSeek-R1, in the field of otolaryngology.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Five common otolaryngology procedures—adenotonsillectomy, tympanoplasty, endoscopic sinus surgery, parotidectomy, and total laryngectomy—were analyzed through standardized queries posed to both AI models<strong>.</strong> Because the prompts replicate questions that patients typically search online, our evaluation focuses on patient-facing informational adequacy. Responses were independently evaluated by two study members for accuracy, clinical relevance, and comprehensiveness, with discrepancies resolved through consensus. The analysis included comparison with clinical guidelines.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>ChatGPT-4.0 generally provided detailed procedural insights, effectively covering indications, methodologies, risks, and recovery processes. However, it occasionally suggested excessive diagnostic imaging and omitted subtle yet significant surgical nuances. DeepSeek-R1 delivered concise, structured responses clearly categorizing indications, treatment alternatives, and procedural risks. Nonetheless, it frequently lacked detailed elaboration, omitting important surgical techniques and minor complications. For instance, DeepSeek-R1 omitted specifics such as hemostatic techniques in adenotonsillectomy and graft stabilization details in tympanoplasty. Neither model adequately addressed critical elements like comprehensive staging, detailed surgical planning, and long-term recovery nuances, especially for complex procedures such as total laryngectomy.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Both ChatGPT-4.0 and DeepSeek-R1 demonstrated significant diagnostic potential but revealed limitations in precision, comprehensiveness, and nuanced clinical reasoning. Their clinical utility remains restricted, highlighting a continued need for AI refinement to enhance patient-specific decision-making capabilities in otolaryngology.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7591,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Otolaryngology","volume":"46 4","pages":"Article 104667"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196070925000705","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy, comprehensiveness, and clinical relevance of two advanced artificial intelligence (AI) models, OpenAI's ChatGPT-4.0 and DeepSeek-R1, in the field of otolaryngology.

Methods

Five common otolaryngology procedures—adenotonsillectomy, tympanoplasty, endoscopic sinus surgery, parotidectomy, and total laryngectomy—were analyzed through standardized queries posed to both AI models. Because the prompts replicate questions that patients typically search online, our evaluation focuses on patient-facing informational adequacy. Responses were independently evaluated by two study members for accuracy, clinical relevance, and comprehensiveness, with discrepancies resolved through consensus. The analysis included comparison with clinical guidelines.

Results

ChatGPT-4.0 generally provided detailed procedural insights, effectively covering indications, methodologies, risks, and recovery processes. However, it occasionally suggested excessive diagnostic imaging and omitted subtle yet significant surgical nuances. DeepSeek-R1 delivered concise, structured responses clearly categorizing indications, treatment alternatives, and procedural risks. Nonetheless, it frequently lacked detailed elaboration, omitting important surgical techniques and minor complications. For instance, DeepSeek-R1 omitted specifics such as hemostatic techniques in adenotonsillectomy and graft stabilization details in tympanoplasty. Neither model adequately addressed critical elements like comprehensive staging, detailed surgical planning, and long-term recovery nuances, especially for complex procedures such as total laryngectomy.

Conclusions

Both ChatGPT-4.0 and DeepSeek-R1 demonstrated significant diagnostic potential but revealed limitations in precision, comprehensiveness, and nuanced clinical reasoning. Their clinical utility remains restricted, highlighting a continued need for AI refinement to enhance patient-specific decision-making capabilities in otolaryngology.
评估先进的人工智能推理模型:ChatGPT-4.0和DeepSeek-R1在耳鼻喉科的诊断性能:比较分析
目的评价OpenAI的ChatGPT-4.0和DeepSeek-R1两种先进人工智能(AI)模型在耳鼻喉科学领域的诊断准确性、全能性和临床相关性。方法通过对两种人工智能模型进行标准化查询,分析五种常见的耳鼻喉外科手术——腺扁桃体切除术、鼓室成形术、内窥镜鼻窦手术、腮腺切除术和全喉切除术。由于提示重复了患者通常在网上搜索的问题,因此我们的评估侧重于面向患者的信息充分性。反应由两名研究成员独立评估准确性、临床相关性和全面性,差异通过共识解决。结果schatgpt -4.0总体上提供了详细的操作见解,有效地涵盖了适应症、方法、风险和恢复过程。然而,它偶尔暗示过度的诊断成像和忽略了微妙但重要的手术细节。DeepSeek-R1提供了简明、结构化的答复,明确分类了适应症、治疗方案和程序风险。尽管如此,它经常缺乏详细的阐述,忽略了重要的手术技术和轻微的并发症。例如,DeepSeek-R1省略了腺扁桃体切除术中的止血技术和鼓室成形术中的移植物稳定细节等细节。这两种模型都没有充分解决关键因素,如综合分期、详细的手术计划和长期恢复的细微差别,特别是对于复杂的手术,如全喉切除术。结论ChatGPT-4.0和DeepSeek-R1均显示出显著的诊断潜力,但在准确性、全面性和细致入微的临床推理方面存在局限性。它们的临床应用仍然受到限制,这突出了人工智能改进的持续需求,以增强耳鼻喉科患者特定的决策能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Otolaryngology
American Journal of Otolaryngology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
378
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Be fully informed about developments in otology, neurotology, audiology, rhinology, allergy, laryngology, speech science, bronchoesophagology, facial plastic surgery, and head and neck surgery. Featured sections include original contributions, grand rounds, current reviews, case reports and socioeconomics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信