Novel gas turbine combined cycle inlet air cooling systems integrating proton exchange membrane electrolyzer, LiBr absorption chiller, and solar energy

IF 9 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Zhidong Chen, Hongwei Zhan, Lei Chen, Weijia Wang, Yanqiang Kong, Lijun Yang, Xiaoze Du, Guoqiang Zhang
{"title":"Novel gas turbine combined cycle inlet air cooling systems integrating proton exchange membrane electrolyzer, LiBr absorption chiller, and solar energy","authors":"Zhidong Chen,&nbsp;Hongwei Zhan,&nbsp;Lei Chen,&nbsp;Weijia Wang,&nbsp;Yanqiang Kong,&nbsp;Lijun Yang,&nbsp;Xiaoze Du,&nbsp;Guoqiang Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.energy.2025.136437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The power output of gas turbine combined cycle (GTCC) is constrained in hot regions due to reduced compressor inlet air flow rate. In this paper, two schemes are proposed to enhance the GTCC power output by compressor inlet air cooling. In scheme 1, during nighttime, electricity from power grid is used to drive proton exchange membrane electrolyzer for producing hydrogen and hot water; during daytime, hot water is used to drive LiBr absorption chiller for compressor inlet air cooling, hydrogen is co-combusted with natural gas. In scheme 2, solar energy is further utilized to aid the absorption chiller for generating more cold energy. The proposed schemes are subject to techno-economic analysis through a case study. The results indicate, compared with the reference GTCC, the annual net power output is enhanced by 38.05 and 59.90 GWh in schemes 1 and 2. The economic analysis suggests scheme 2 outperforms scheme 1: for schemes 1 and 2, the dynamic payback periods are 10.61 and 5.62 years, with the corresponding net present value increments being 12.74 and 38.05 million USD, the levelized cost of electricity of the augmented power are 0.16 and 0.12 USD/kWh, and the levelized cost of hydrogen is 3.98 USD/(kg H<sub>2</sub>).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11647,"journal":{"name":"Energy","volume":"328 ","pages":"Article 136437"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544225020791","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The power output of gas turbine combined cycle (GTCC) is constrained in hot regions due to reduced compressor inlet air flow rate. In this paper, two schemes are proposed to enhance the GTCC power output by compressor inlet air cooling. In scheme 1, during nighttime, electricity from power grid is used to drive proton exchange membrane electrolyzer for producing hydrogen and hot water; during daytime, hot water is used to drive LiBr absorption chiller for compressor inlet air cooling, hydrogen is co-combusted with natural gas. In scheme 2, solar energy is further utilized to aid the absorption chiller for generating more cold energy. The proposed schemes are subject to techno-economic analysis through a case study. The results indicate, compared with the reference GTCC, the annual net power output is enhanced by 38.05 and 59.90 GWh in schemes 1 and 2. The economic analysis suggests scheme 2 outperforms scheme 1: for schemes 1 and 2, the dynamic payback periods are 10.61 and 5.62 years, with the corresponding net present value increments being 12.74 and 38.05 million USD, the levelized cost of electricity of the augmented power are 0.16 and 0.12 USD/kWh, and the levelized cost of hydrogen is 3.98 USD/(kg H2).

Abstract Image

结合质子交换膜电解槽、溴化锂吸收式制冷机和太阳能的新型燃气轮机联合循环进气冷却系统
由于压气机进气流量的减小,燃气轮机联合循环在热区的输出功率受到限制。本文提出了两种通过压缩机进气冷却提高GTCC输出功率的方案。方案一,夜间利用电网供电驱动质子交换膜电解槽生产氢气和热水;白天,利用热水驱动溴化锂吸收式制冷机对压缩机进气进行冷却,氢气与天然气共燃。在方案2中,进一步利用太阳能辅助吸收式制冷机产生更多的冷能。通过案例分析,对提出的方案进行技术经济分析。结果表明,与参考GTCC相比,方案1和方案2的年净发电量分别提高了38.05和59.90 GWh。经济分析表明,方案2优于方案1:方案1和方案2的动态回收期分别为10.61年和5.62年,对应的净现值增量分别为12.74和3805万美元,增建电力的平准化电力成本分别为0.16和0.12美元/千瓦时,氢气平准化成本为3.98美元/(kg H2)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy
Energy 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
15.30
自引率
14.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14.2 weeks
期刊介绍: Energy is a multidisciplinary, international journal that publishes research and analysis in the field of energy engineering. Our aim is to become a leading peer-reviewed platform and a trusted source of information for energy-related topics. The journal covers a range of areas including mechanical engineering, thermal sciences, and energy analysis. We are particularly interested in research on energy modelling, prediction, integrated energy systems, planning, and management. Additionally, we welcome papers on energy conservation, efficiency, biomass and bioenergy, renewable energy, electricity supply and demand, energy storage, buildings, and economic and policy issues. These topics should align with our broader multidisciplinary focus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信