Machine learning-based performance and optimal refrigerant charge prediction for a split air conditioning system

IF 6.1 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Rajendran Prabakaran , B. Gomathi , A. Lalitha Saravanan , P. Jeyalakshmi , Dhasan Mohan Lal , Sung Chul Kim
{"title":"Machine learning-based performance and optimal refrigerant charge prediction for a split air conditioning system","authors":"Rajendran Prabakaran ,&nbsp;B. Gomathi ,&nbsp;A. Lalitha Saravanan ,&nbsp;P. Jeyalakshmi ,&nbsp;Dhasan Mohan Lal ,&nbsp;Sung Chul Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2025.126764","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Maintaining the optimal refrigerant charge and accurately predicting the performance of split-type air conditioning (STAC) systems are essential for enhancing energy efficiency and reducing carbon emissions. The adoption of the environmentally friendly refrigerant R290 as a replacement for R22 has increased due to updated regulations. However, optimizing refrigerant charge and system performance typically demands substantial research, cost, and time. To address this challenge, six machine learning (ML) models—artificial neural network (ANN), multi-layer perceptron (MLP), extreme gradient boosting (XGB), support vector regression (SVR), random forest (RF), and K-nearest neighbor (KNN)—were employed to predict STAC performance and determine the optimal refrigerant charge. For model development, the considered input features were indoor and outdoor temperatures—specifically, wet-bulb temperature (WBT), dry-bulb temperature (DBT)—and refrigerant charge. The predicted outputs were system pressure, power consumption, coefficient of performance (COP), refrigerant mass flow rate, and evaporator capacity. Correlation analysis showed a strong negative correlation between outdoor DBT and COP (−0.96), followed by indoor DBT (−0.81) and indoor WBT (−0.67). However, no perfect relationship was observed between COP and refrigerant charge, likely due to nonlinearity. Among the models, SVR, ANN, and RF performed best on smaller datasets (&lt;20 samples), while XGB demonstrated superior performance on larger datasets (&gt;40 samples). XGB outperformed MLP and RF, achieving deviations within ±5 %, a mean absolute error of 2.539, and an R<sup>2</sup> value of 0.957. The optimal refrigerant charge amounts predicted for R290 were 460 and 320 g for the existing and modified systems, respectively, 2.3 % and 3.2 % higher than the experimental values. This study underscores the potential of ML models, particularly XGB, in optimizing STAC systems using environmentally friendly refrigerants.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8201,"journal":{"name":"Applied Thermal Engineering","volume":"274 ","pages":"Article 126764"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Thermal Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1359431125013560","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Maintaining the optimal refrigerant charge and accurately predicting the performance of split-type air conditioning (STAC) systems are essential for enhancing energy efficiency and reducing carbon emissions. The adoption of the environmentally friendly refrigerant R290 as a replacement for R22 has increased due to updated regulations. However, optimizing refrigerant charge and system performance typically demands substantial research, cost, and time. To address this challenge, six machine learning (ML) models—artificial neural network (ANN), multi-layer perceptron (MLP), extreme gradient boosting (XGB), support vector regression (SVR), random forest (RF), and K-nearest neighbor (KNN)—were employed to predict STAC performance and determine the optimal refrigerant charge. For model development, the considered input features were indoor and outdoor temperatures—specifically, wet-bulb temperature (WBT), dry-bulb temperature (DBT)—and refrigerant charge. The predicted outputs were system pressure, power consumption, coefficient of performance (COP), refrigerant mass flow rate, and evaporator capacity. Correlation analysis showed a strong negative correlation between outdoor DBT and COP (−0.96), followed by indoor DBT (−0.81) and indoor WBT (−0.67). However, no perfect relationship was observed between COP and refrigerant charge, likely due to nonlinearity. Among the models, SVR, ANN, and RF performed best on smaller datasets (<20 samples), while XGB demonstrated superior performance on larger datasets (>40 samples). XGB outperformed MLP and RF, achieving deviations within ±5 %, a mean absolute error of 2.539, and an R2 value of 0.957. The optimal refrigerant charge amounts predicted for R290 were 460 and 320 g for the existing and modified systems, respectively, 2.3 % and 3.2 % higher than the experimental values. This study underscores the potential of ML models, particularly XGB, in optimizing STAC systems using environmentally friendly refrigerants.
分体式空调系统基于机器学习的性能及制冷剂充注量优化预测
保持最佳制冷剂充注量和准确预测分体式空调(STAC)系统的性能对于提高能源效率和减少碳排放至关重要。由于法规的更新,采用环保制冷剂R290替代R22的情况有所增加。然而,优化制冷剂充注量和系统性能通常需要大量的研究、成本和时间。为了应对这一挑战,采用了六种机器学习(ML)模型——人工神经网络(ANN)、多层感知器(MLP)、极端梯度增强(XGB)、支持向量回归(SVR)、随机森林(RF)和k -最近邻(KNN)——来预测STAC性能并确定最佳制冷剂充注量。对于模型开发,考虑的输入特征是室内和室外温度-特别是湿球温度(WBT),干球温度(DBT)和制冷剂充注量。预测输出包括系统压力、功耗、性能系数(COP)、制冷剂质量流量和蒸发器容量。相关分析显示,室外DBT与COP呈显著负相关(- 0.96),其次为室内DBT(- 0.81)与室内WBT(- 0.67)。然而,COP和制冷剂充注量之间没有完美的关系,可能是由于非线性。其中,SVR、ANN和RF在较小的数据集(20个样本)上表现最佳,而XGB在较大的数据集(40个样本)上表现优异。XGB优于MLP和RF,偏差在±5%以内,平均绝对误差为2.539,R2值为0.957。现有系统和改进系统的R290的最佳制冷剂充注量分别为460和320 g,比实验值分别高2.3%和3.2%。这项研究强调了ML模型,特别是XGB模型在使用环保制冷剂优化STAC系统方面的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Thermal Engineering
Applied Thermal Engineering 工程技术-工程:机械
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
15.60%
发文量
1474
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: Applied Thermal Engineering disseminates novel research related to the design, development and demonstration of components, devices, equipment, technologies and systems involving thermal processes for the production, storage, utilization and conservation of energy, with a focus on engineering application. The journal publishes high-quality and high-impact Original Research Articles, Review Articles, Short Communications and Letters to the Editor on cutting-edge innovations in research, and recent advances or issues of interest to the thermal engineering community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信