Comparative study of supercritical CO2 brayton cycles for solar towers plants in arid climates: Design and off-design performance

IF 9.9 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Meryame Soumhi , Yassine Zalim , Zakia EL Ahmadi , Fayrouz El Hamdani , Hicham Bouzekri
{"title":"Comparative study of supercritical CO2 brayton cycles for solar towers plants in arid climates: Design and off-design performance","authors":"Meryame Soumhi ,&nbsp;Yassine Zalim ,&nbsp;Zakia EL Ahmadi ,&nbsp;Fayrouz El Hamdani ,&nbsp;Hicham Bouzekri","doi":"10.1016/j.enconman.2025.119902","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Concentrated Solar Power plants offer significant potential for sustainable energy generation, but their efficiency is often constrained by extreme ambient conditions and limited water resources in arid climates. This study examines the design and off-design performance of simple and recompression supercritical CO<sub>2</sub> Brayton cycles across various power scales, focusing on their integration into CSP tower plants in Morocco. The objective is to evaluate the impact of scaling on cycle efficiency, turbomachinery design, compare the performance of both cycles and identify optimal parameters to enhance performance in challenging environments. A detailed parametric sensitivity study of both cycle configurations was conducted to determine the optimal total recuperator conductance for improving cycle efficiency. For model validation, the results were compared with the National Renewable Energy Laboratory model. The solar field design was developed using the System Advisor Model at large scale. Off-design conditions were analyzed to assess the effects of varying ambient conditions and heat transfer fluid temperatures on cycle performance. The design analysis demonstrates that scaling up significantly improves thermal efficiency for both cycle configurations. The study identified optimal recuperator conductance values for simple and recompression cycle, leading to thermal efficiencies of 40.1 % and 45 %, respectively. Validation against the SAM model showed strong agreement, with relative errors under 3 %. Solar field design results indicate that the recompression cycle requires 12 % less heliostat field area than the simple cycle. Additionally, off-design analysis revealed that the simple cycle is more adaptable to arid climates, maintaining similar efficiency as recompression cycle at higher ambient temperatures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11664,"journal":{"name":"Energy Conversion and Management","volume":"337 ","pages":"Article 119902"},"PeriodicalIF":9.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Conversion and Management","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196890425004261","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Concentrated Solar Power plants offer significant potential for sustainable energy generation, but their efficiency is often constrained by extreme ambient conditions and limited water resources in arid climates. This study examines the design and off-design performance of simple and recompression supercritical CO2 Brayton cycles across various power scales, focusing on their integration into CSP tower plants in Morocco. The objective is to evaluate the impact of scaling on cycle efficiency, turbomachinery design, compare the performance of both cycles and identify optimal parameters to enhance performance in challenging environments. A detailed parametric sensitivity study of both cycle configurations was conducted to determine the optimal total recuperator conductance for improving cycle efficiency. For model validation, the results were compared with the National Renewable Energy Laboratory model. The solar field design was developed using the System Advisor Model at large scale. Off-design conditions were analyzed to assess the effects of varying ambient conditions and heat transfer fluid temperatures on cycle performance. The design analysis demonstrates that scaling up significantly improves thermal efficiency for both cycle configurations. The study identified optimal recuperator conductance values for simple and recompression cycle, leading to thermal efficiencies of 40.1 % and 45 %, respectively. Validation against the SAM model showed strong agreement, with relative errors under 3 %. Solar field design results indicate that the recompression cycle requires 12 % less heliostat field area than the simple cycle. Additionally, off-design analysis revealed that the simple cycle is more adaptable to arid climates, maintaining similar efficiency as recompression cycle at higher ambient temperatures.

Abstract Image

干旱气候下太阳能塔电厂超临界CO2布雷顿循环的比较研究:设计与非设计性能
聚光太阳能发电厂为可持续能源生产提供了巨大的潜力,但其效率往往受到极端环境条件和干旱气候下有限水资源的限制。本研究考察了简单和再压缩超临界CO2布雷顿循环在不同功率规模下的设计和非设计性能,重点研究了它们与摩洛哥CSP塔式电厂的整合。目的是评估结垢对循环效率和涡轮机械设计的影响,比较两个循环的性能,并确定最佳参数,以提高在具有挑战性的环境中的性能。对两种循环结构进行了详细的参数敏感性研究,以确定提高循环效率的最佳总回热器电导。为了验证模型,将结果与国家可再生能源实验室的模型进行了比较。太阳能场设计是使用系统顾问模型进行大规模开发的。分析了非设计工况,以评估不同的环境条件和传热流体温度对循环性能的影响。设计分析表明,放大可显著提高两种循环配置的热效率。该研究确定了简单循环和再压缩循环的最佳回热器电导值,其热效率分别为40.1%和45%。对SAM模型的验证显示出很强的一致性,相对误差在3%以下。太阳场设计结果表明,再压缩循环所需定日场面积比简单循环所需定日场面积少12%。此外,非设计分析表明,简单循环更适合干旱气候,在较高环境温度下保持与再压缩循环相似的效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Conversion and Management
Energy Conversion and Management 工程技术-力学
CiteScore
19.00
自引率
11.50%
发文量
1304
审稿时长
17 days
期刊介绍: The journal Energy Conversion and Management provides a forum for publishing original contributions and comprehensive technical review articles of interdisciplinary and original research on all important energy topics. The topics considered include energy generation, utilization, conversion, storage, transmission, conservation, management and sustainability. These topics typically involve various types of energy such as mechanical, thermal, nuclear, chemical, electromagnetic, magnetic and electric. These energy types cover all known energy resources, including renewable resources (e.g., solar, bio, hydro, wind, geothermal and ocean energy), fossil fuels and nuclear resources.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信