{"title":"Optimal product replacement: The dark sides of technological progress and the circular economy","authors":"Régis Chenavaz , Stanko Dimitrov , Frank Figge , Rainer Schlosser","doi":"10.1016/j.resconrec.2025.108341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The intersection of the circular economy and technological obsolescence is pivotal for understanding sustainable consumption and innovation’s impacts on product lifecycle management. Prevailing literature emphasizes producer-driven obsolescence and often overlooks the consumer’s role in product replacement decisions, particularly in a circular economic context. This study bridges this gap by exploring consumer-driven economic obsolescence and the resulting implications for product longevity and replacement strategies. Employing a composite methodology that integrates economic modeling with net present value analysis, this article investigates the timing of optimal product replacement from the consumer perspective. It challenges the conventional minimum cost per unit time methods by introducing a profit-equating replacement strategy tailored to circular economy principles. Key findings reveal a paradoxical dynamic wherein increased technological advancement can inversely affect optimal replacement timing, underscoring a consumer-centric view of obsolescence. Conclusively, this research refines our understanding of obsolescence by reconstructing its economic rationale within the circular economy, thus offering nuanced insights for sustainable product lifecycle management and policy-making.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21153,"journal":{"name":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","volume":"220 ","pages":"Article 108341"},"PeriodicalIF":11.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344925002204","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The intersection of the circular economy and technological obsolescence is pivotal for understanding sustainable consumption and innovation’s impacts on product lifecycle management. Prevailing literature emphasizes producer-driven obsolescence and often overlooks the consumer’s role in product replacement decisions, particularly in a circular economic context. This study bridges this gap by exploring consumer-driven economic obsolescence and the resulting implications for product longevity and replacement strategies. Employing a composite methodology that integrates economic modeling with net present value analysis, this article investigates the timing of optimal product replacement from the consumer perspective. It challenges the conventional minimum cost per unit time methods by introducing a profit-equating replacement strategy tailored to circular economy principles. Key findings reveal a paradoxical dynamic wherein increased technological advancement can inversely affect optimal replacement timing, underscoring a consumer-centric view of obsolescence. Conclusively, this research refines our understanding of obsolescence by reconstructing its economic rationale within the circular economy, thus offering nuanced insights for sustainable product lifecycle management and policy-making.
期刊介绍:
The journal Resources, Conservation & Recycling welcomes contributions from research, which consider sustainable management and conservation of resources. The journal prioritizes understanding the transformation processes crucial for transitioning toward more sustainable production and consumption systems. It highlights technological, economic, institutional, and policy aspects related to specific resource management practices such as conservation, recycling, and resource substitution, as well as broader strategies like improving resource productivity and restructuring production and consumption patterns.
Contributions may address regional, national, or international scales and can range from individual resources or technologies to entire sectors or systems. Authors are encouraged to explore scientific and methodological issues alongside practical, environmental, and economic implications. However, manuscripts focusing solely on laboratory experiments without discussing their broader implications will not be considered for publication in the journal.