Optimal product replacement: The dark sides of technological progress and the circular economy

IF 11.2 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Régis Chenavaz , Stanko Dimitrov , Frank Figge , Rainer Schlosser
{"title":"Optimal product replacement: The dark sides of technological progress and the circular economy","authors":"Régis Chenavaz ,&nbsp;Stanko Dimitrov ,&nbsp;Frank Figge ,&nbsp;Rainer Schlosser","doi":"10.1016/j.resconrec.2025.108341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The intersection of the circular economy and technological obsolescence is pivotal for understanding sustainable consumption and innovation’s impacts on product lifecycle management. Prevailing literature emphasizes producer-driven obsolescence and often overlooks the consumer’s role in product replacement decisions, particularly in a circular economic context. This study bridges this gap by exploring consumer-driven economic obsolescence and the resulting implications for product longevity and replacement strategies. Employing a composite methodology that integrates economic modeling with net present value analysis, this article investigates the timing of optimal product replacement from the consumer perspective. It challenges the conventional minimum cost per unit time methods by introducing a profit-equating replacement strategy tailored to circular economy principles. Key findings reveal a paradoxical dynamic wherein increased technological advancement can inversely affect optimal replacement timing, underscoring a consumer-centric view of obsolescence. Conclusively, this research refines our understanding of obsolescence by reconstructing its economic rationale within the circular economy, thus offering nuanced insights for sustainable product lifecycle management and policy-making.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21153,"journal":{"name":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","volume":"220 ","pages":"Article 108341"},"PeriodicalIF":11.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344925002204","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The intersection of the circular economy and technological obsolescence is pivotal for understanding sustainable consumption and innovation’s impacts on product lifecycle management. Prevailing literature emphasizes producer-driven obsolescence and often overlooks the consumer’s role in product replacement decisions, particularly in a circular economic context. This study bridges this gap by exploring consumer-driven economic obsolescence and the resulting implications for product longevity and replacement strategies. Employing a composite methodology that integrates economic modeling with net present value analysis, this article investigates the timing of optimal product replacement from the consumer perspective. It challenges the conventional minimum cost per unit time methods by introducing a profit-equating replacement strategy tailored to circular economy principles. Key findings reveal a paradoxical dynamic wherein increased technological advancement can inversely affect optimal replacement timing, underscoring a consumer-centric view of obsolescence. Conclusively, this research refines our understanding of obsolescence by reconstructing its economic rationale within the circular economy, thus offering nuanced insights for sustainable product lifecycle management and policy-making.

Abstract Image

最优产品替代:技术进步和循环经济的阴暗面
循环经济和技术过时的交集对于理解可持续消费和创新对产品生命周期管理的影响至关重要。主流文献强调生产者驱动的过时,往往忽视了消费者在产品替代决策中的作用,特别是在循环经济背景下。本研究通过探索消费者驱动的经济过时及其对产品寿命和替代策略的影响,弥合了这一差距。本文采用将经济模型与净现值分析相结合的复合方法,从消费者的角度研究了最佳产品更换的时机。它通过引入符合循环经济原则的利润相等的替代策略,挑战了传统的单位时间最低成本方法。关键发现揭示了一种矛盾的动态,其中技术进步的增加会对最佳替换时间产生相反的影响,强调了以消费者为中心的过时观点。最后,本研究通过在循环经济中重构过时的经济原理,完善了我们对过时的理解,从而为可持续产品生命周期管理和决策提供了细致的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Resources Conservation and Recycling
Resources Conservation and Recycling 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
22.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
625
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The journal Resources, Conservation & Recycling welcomes contributions from research, which consider sustainable management and conservation of resources. The journal prioritizes understanding the transformation processes crucial for transitioning toward more sustainable production and consumption systems. It highlights technological, economic, institutional, and policy aspects related to specific resource management practices such as conservation, recycling, and resource substitution, as well as broader strategies like improving resource productivity and restructuring production and consumption patterns. Contributions may address regional, national, or international scales and can range from individual resources or technologies to entire sectors or systems. Authors are encouraged to explore scientific and methodological issues alongside practical, environmental, and economic implications. However, manuscripts focusing solely on laboratory experiments without discussing their broader implications will not be considered for publication in the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信