Songsong Shen, Shang Pan, Jian Hu, Jingjin Yu, Zhimin Yang
{"title":"Effects of biochar combined with different nitrogen fertilization rates on turf quality and carbon footprint in a turf system","authors":"Songsong Shen, Shang Pan, Jian Hu, Jingjin Yu, Zhimin Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.eti.2025.104249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Biochar has been widely recognized for its potential to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions and enhance soil fertility through increased soil organic carbon (SOC) storage; however, systematic evaluations of carbon balance and ecological benefits in turf systems remain scarce. This study included eight treatments combining four N (nitrogen) rates (N<sub>0</sub>: 0, N<sub>1</sub>: 150, N<sub>2</sub>: 225, N<sub>3</sub>: 300) kg N ha<sup>−1</sup> with two biochar practices (SB<sub>0</sub>: 0, SB:40) t ha<sup>−1</sup>. The results showed that biochar application treatments (N<sub>0</sub>SB, N<sub>1</sub>SB, N<sub>2</sub>SB, and N<sub>3</sub>SB) reduced cumulative fluxes of soil N<sub>2</sub>O and CH<sub>4</sub> (global warming potential, GWP) by 17.37 %, 26.62 %, 32.73 %, and 30.97 %, net global warming potential (NGWP) 43.71 %, 369.64 %, 1046.17 %, and 545.83 %, and CF by 32.01 %, 192.81 %, 356.66 %, and 253.34 %, while increasing SOC sequestration by 129.20 %, 138.61 %, 133.89 %, and 133.61 %, total biomass by 3.99 %, 14.22 %, 15.51 %, and 14.78 %, and turf normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) by −0.18 %, 2.81 %, 2.81 %, and 1.89 % compared to non-biochar treatments. Although biochar slightly increased ecosystem respiration, the effect was not significant (<em>p</em> > 0.05). Notably, compared to N<sub>3</sub>SB, N<sub>2</sub>SB significantly reduced N<sub>2</sub>O by 12.85 %, CH<sub>4</sub> by 11.47 %, CF (carbon footprint) by 16.01 %, and NGWP by 9.82 %, while ecosystem respiration, SOC storage, turfgrass total biomass, and NDVI exhibited no significant differences between the two treatments. Overall, the co-application of biochar with 225 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup> is a win−win strategy for reducing CF, enhancing carbon sequestration, and maintaining turf quality.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11725,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Technology & Innovation","volume":"39 ","pages":"Article 104249"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Technology & Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352186425002354","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Biochar has been widely recognized for its potential to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions and enhance soil fertility through increased soil organic carbon (SOC) storage; however, systematic evaluations of carbon balance and ecological benefits in turf systems remain scarce. This study included eight treatments combining four N (nitrogen) rates (N0: 0, N1: 150, N2: 225, N3: 300) kg N ha−1 with two biochar practices (SB0: 0, SB:40) t ha−1. The results showed that biochar application treatments (N0SB, N1SB, N2SB, and N3SB) reduced cumulative fluxes of soil N2O and CH4 (global warming potential, GWP) by 17.37 %, 26.62 %, 32.73 %, and 30.97 %, net global warming potential (NGWP) 43.71 %, 369.64 %, 1046.17 %, and 545.83 %, and CF by 32.01 %, 192.81 %, 356.66 %, and 253.34 %, while increasing SOC sequestration by 129.20 %, 138.61 %, 133.89 %, and 133.61 %, total biomass by 3.99 %, 14.22 %, 15.51 %, and 14.78 %, and turf normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) by −0.18 %, 2.81 %, 2.81 %, and 1.89 % compared to non-biochar treatments. Although biochar slightly increased ecosystem respiration, the effect was not significant (p > 0.05). Notably, compared to N3SB, N2SB significantly reduced N2O by 12.85 %, CH4 by 11.47 %, CF (carbon footprint) by 16.01 %, and NGWP by 9.82 %, while ecosystem respiration, SOC storage, turfgrass total biomass, and NDVI exhibited no significant differences between the two treatments. Overall, the co-application of biochar with 225 kg N ha−1 is a win−win strategy for reducing CF, enhancing carbon sequestration, and maintaining turf quality.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Technology & Innovation adopts a challenge-oriented approach to solutions by integrating natural sciences to promote a sustainable future. The journal aims to foster the creation and development of innovative products, technologies, and ideas that enhance the environment, with impacts across soil, air, water, and food in rural and urban areas.
As a platform for disseminating scientific evidence for environmental protection and sustainable development, the journal emphasizes fundamental science, methodologies, tools, techniques, and policy considerations. It emphasizes the importance of science and technology in environmental benefits, including smarter, cleaner technologies for environmental protection, more efficient resource processing methods, and the evidence supporting their effectiveness.