Bingqian Zhang , Chen Feng , Yacong Hu , Fan Li , Tina Wu , Shawn Li , Kun Yan , Zeshi Feng , Yao Shi , Jinping Tian , Lyujun Chen
{"title":"High-resolution life cycle carbon footprint analysis for footwear products underpinned by on-site measured data","authors":"Bingqian Zhang , Chen Feng , Yacong Hu , Fan Li , Tina Wu , Shawn Li , Kun Yan , Zeshi Feng , Yao Shi , Jinping Tian , Lyujun Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.resconrec.2025.108376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Quantifying footwear carbon footprints is crucial to carbon mitigation due to >20 billion pairs of global production annually. In light of complexities of footwear manufacturing, few studies have reported the carbon footprint of footwear in high resolution. This study developed a detailed cradle-to-grave carbon footprint accounting method based on on-site measurement of materials, energy, transportation, and waste for two representative products. A spreadsheet-based life cycle assessment (LCA) model was developed with over 1500 data entries, incorporating 79 materials and the electricity use from 131 sets of equipment across 169 processes. The Pareto’s 80/20 rule was applied to classify the extensive material inventories. The mass and energy flows of footwear production, along with carbon footprints and 10 other environmental impact categories, were carefully analyzed. This study also evaluated the impacts of emission factors from four LCA background databases. Measures to reduce footwear carbon footprints and policy implications were discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21153,"journal":{"name":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","volume":"220 ","pages":"Article 108376"},"PeriodicalIF":11.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344925002551","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Quantifying footwear carbon footprints is crucial to carbon mitigation due to >20 billion pairs of global production annually. In light of complexities of footwear manufacturing, few studies have reported the carbon footprint of footwear in high resolution. This study developed a detailed cradle-to-grave carbon footprint accounting method based on on-site measurement of materials, energy, transportation, and waste for two representative products. A spreadsheet-based life cycle assessment (LCA) model was developed with over 1500 data entries, incorporating 79 materials and the electricity use from 131 sets of equipment across 169 processes. The Pareto’s 80/20 rule was applied to classify the extensive material inventories. The mass and energy flows of footwear production, along with carbon footprints and 10 other environmental impact categories, were carefully analyzed. This study also evaluated the impacts of emission factors from four LCA background databases. Measures to reduce footwear carbon footprints and policy implications were discussed.
期刊介绍:
The journal Resources, Conservation & Recycling welcomes contributions from research, which consider sustainable management and conservation of resources. The journal prioritizes understanding the transformation processes crucial for transitioning toward more sustainable production and consumption systems. It highlights technological, economic, institutional, and policy aspects related to specific resource management practices such as conservation, recycling, and resource substitution, as well as broader strategies like improving resource productivity and restructuring production and consumption patterns.
Contributions may address regional, national, or international scales and can range from individual resources or technologies to entire sectors or systems. Authors are encouraged to explore scientific and methodological issues alongside practical, environmental, and economic implications. However, manuscripts focusing solely on laboratory experiments without discussing their broader implications will not be considered for publication in the journal.