{"title":"A computational framework for modeling and predicting maize senescence: integrating UAV phenotyping, logistic growth, and genomics","authors":"Alper Adak , Aaron J. DeSalvio , Seth C. Murray","doi":"10.1016/j.compag.2025.110471","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Advances in sensing technologies have led to the emergence of a new paradigm in plant biology and predictive plant breeding able to improve the precision in quantifying and predicting physiological traits such as plant senescence. Here, 517 recombinant inbred lines (RILs) were previously genotyped and phenotyped in this study using an unoccupied aerial system (UAS also known as UAV or drone) equipped with an RGB sensor, enabling efficient monitoring of senescence at multiple developmental stages across 14 flights from 28 to 128 days after planting. Temporal senescence was scored in the last five flights and uniquely subjected to a logistic growth model (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.99 ± 0.01). Days to Senescence (DTSE) and a modified Grain Filling Period (GFP) were introduced in this study, derived from the logistic growth model using temporal senescence data.</div><div>The study also explored the predictive power of logistic growth model-driven genomic (M1) and combined genomic and phenomic (M2) models. The combined model (M2), incorporating phenomic data from vegetation indices (NGRDI and ExR) collected before senescence, outperformed the genomic model (M1), particularly in challenging scenarios involving untested RILs and time points (CV2: 0.32 vs 0.48; CV00: 0.22 vs 0.33), showcasing potential for predictive breeding of delayed senescence. M1 achieved prediction abilities of 0.45 and 0.38 for DTSE and GFP, respectively, which improved to 0.47 and 0.40 with M2.</div><div>Overall, this research advances the prediction of temporal senescence dynamics through computational frameworks integrating phenotyping, modeling, and genomic data. These advancements enable the selection of genotypes with optimized senescence rate.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50627,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Electronics in Agriculture","volume":"237 ","pages":"Article 110471"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers and Electronics in Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168169925005770","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Advances in sensing technologies have led to the emergence of a new paradigm in plant biology and predictive plant breeding able to improve the precision in quantifying and predicting physiological traits such as plant senescence. Here, 517 recombinant inbred lines (RILs) were previously genotyped and phenotyped in this study using an unoccupied aerial system (UAS also known as UAV or drone) equipped with an RGB sensor, enabling efficient monitoring of senescence at multiple developmental stages across 14 flights from 28 to 128 days after planting. Temporal senescence was scored in the last five flights and uniquely subjected to a logistic growth model (R2 = 0.99 ± 0.01). Days to Senescence (DTSE) and a modified Grain Filling Period (GFP) were introduced in this study, derived from the logistic growth model using temporal senescence data.
The study also explored the predictive power of logistic growth model-driven genomic (M1) and combined genomic and phenomic (M2) models. The combined model (M2), incorporating phenomic data from vegetation indices (NGRDI and ExR) collected before senescence, outperformed the genomic model (M1), particularly in challenging scenarios involving untested RILs and time points (CV2: 0.32 vs 0.48; CV00: 0.22 vs 0.33), showcasing potential for predictive breeding of delayed senescence. M1 achieved prediction abilities of 0.45 and 0.38 for DTSE and GFP, respectively, which improved to 0.47 and 0.40 with M2.
Overall, this research advances the prediction of temporal senescence dynamics through computational frameworks integrating phenotyping, modeling, and genomic data. These advancements enable the selection of genotypes with optimized senescence rate.
传感技术的进步导致植物生物学和植物预测育种的新范式的出现,能够提高定量和预测植物衰老等生理性状的精度。在本研究中,517个重组自交系(RILs)先前使用配备RGB传感器的无人驾驶空中系统(UAS)进行基因分型和表型分型,能够在种植后28至128天的14次飞行中有效监测多个发育阶段的衰老。在最后五次飞行中对时间衰老进行评分,并独特地采用logistic增长模型(R2 = 0.99±0.01)。本研究引入了基于时间衰老数据的logistic生长模型,并引入了修正的籽粒灌浆期(GFP)和衰老天数(DTSE)。该研究还探讨了logistic增长模型驱动的基因组模型(M1)和基因组与表型组合模型(M2)的预测能力。结合衰老前收集的植被指数(NGRDI和ExR)的表型数据的组合模型(M2)优于基因组模型(M1),特别是在涉及未经测试的ril和时间点的具有挑战性的场景中(CV2: 0.32 vs 0.48;CV00: 0.22 vs 0.33),显示了延迟衰老预测育种的潜力。M1对DTSE和GFP的预测能力分别为0.45和0.38,对M2的预测能力分别为0.47和0.40。总体而言,本研究通过整合表型、建模和基因组数据的计算框架推进了时间衰老动力学的预测。这些进展使选择具有最佳衰老率的基因型成为可能。
期刊介绍:
Computers and Electronics in Agriculture provides international coverage of advancements in computer hardware, software, electronic instrumentation, and control systems applied to agricultural challenges. Encompassing agronomy, horticulture, forestry, aquaculture, and animal farming, the journal publishes original papers, reviews, and applications notes. It explores the use of computers and electronics in plant or animal agricultural production, covering topics like agricultural soils, water, pests, controlled environments, and waste. The scope extends to on-farm post-harvest operations and relevant technologies, including artificial intelligence, sensors, machine vision, robotics, networking, and simulation modeling. Its companion journal, Smart Agricultural Technology, continues the focus on smart applications in production agriculture.