Dosimetric assessment of occupational exposure during percutaneous nephrolithotomy using Monte Carlo simulation

IF 2.8 3区 物理与天体物理 Q3 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL
Evelyn L. Oliveira , Monique F. Silva , William S. Santos , Lucio P. Neves , Ana P. Perini
{"title":"Dosimetric assessment of occupational exposure during percutaneous nephrolithotomy using Monte Carlo simulation","authors":"Evelyn L. Oliveira ,&nbsp;Monique F. Silva ,&nbsp;William S. Santos ,&nbsp;Lucio P. Neves ,&nbsp;Ana P. Perini","doi":"10.1016/j.radphyschem.2025.112914","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This research focuses on estimating the radiation doses delivered to the main and assistant physicians during percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) via computer modeling. To achieve this, scenarios were simulated using the Monte Carlo <em>N</em>-Particle 6.2 code in a simulated PCNL procedure setting. The scenarios varied according to the anteroposterior (AP), right anterior oblique, 30° (RAO30) and left anterior oblique, 30° (LAO30) projections. Variations in body mass index (BMI) were modeled using two virtual anthropomorphic phantoms. These different phantoms were employed to study the influence of the BMI factor on the scattered radiation by the patient. The study also assessed the impact of personal protective equipment (PPE) and collective protective equipment (CPE) on reducing radiation doses for the main physician and assistant. The physician and assistant were simulated using a MASH3 virtual phantom. The Siemens SIREMOBIL Compact L fluoroscopic device was modeled, the tube voltage value for all scenarios was 70 kV, as well as the field size was 11 × 11 cm<sup>2</sup>, and the experimental kerma-area product was equal to 27 Gy⋅cm<sup>2</sup>. The effective doses obtained for the main physician ranged from 0.92 to 41.47 μSv. The use of PPE and CPE reduced the effective dose by 94 %. The equivalent doses found for the main physician's eyes varied in a range of 0.172–7.34 mSv, and the use of PPE and CPE resulted in a 98 % reduction in eye dose. The effective doses obtained for the assistant ranged from 0.33 to 13.49 μSv. In all simulated scenarios, the main physician receives an effective dose up to 71 % higher than the assistant. Our study found that oblique projections resulted in higher radiation exposure for the main physician, with the LAO30 projection increasing the dose by 51 % compared to the AP projection.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20861,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Physics and Chemistry","volume":"236 ","pages":"Article 112914"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation Physics and Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969806X25004062","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research focuses on estimating the radiation doses delivered to the main and assistant physicians during percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) via computer modeling. To achieve this, scenarios were simulated using the Monte Carlo N-Particle 6.2 code in a simulated PCNL procedure setting. The scenarios varied according to the anteroposterior (AP), right anterior oblique, 30° (RAO30) and left anterior oblique, 30° (LAO30) projections. Variations in body mass index (BMI) were modeled using two virtual anthropomorphic phantoms. These different phantoms were employed to study the influence of the BMI factor on the scattered radiation by the patient. The study also assessed the impact of personal protective equipment (PPE) and collective protective equipment (CPE) on reducing radiation doses for the main physician and assistant. The physician and assistant were simulated using a MASH3 virtual phantom. The Siemens SIREMOBIL Compact L fluoroscopic device was modeled, the tube voltage value for all scenarios was 70 kV, as well as the field size was 11 × 11 cm2, and the experimental kerma-area product was equal to 27 Gy⋅cm2. The effective doses obtained for the main physician ranged from 0.92 to 41.47 μSv. The use of PPE and CPE reduced the effective dose by 94 %. The equivalent doses found for the main physician's eyes varied in a range of 0.172–7.34 mSv, and the use of PPE and CPE resulted in a 98 % reduction in eye dose. The effective doses obtained for the assistant ranged from 0.33 to 13.49 μSv. In all simulated scenarios, the main physician receives an effective dose up to 71 % higher than the assistant. Our study found that oblique projections resulted in higher radiation exposure for the main physician, with the LAO30 projection increasing the dose by 51 % compared to the AP projection.
蒙特卡罗模拟经皮肾镜取石术中职业性暴露的剂量学评估
本研究的重点是通过计算机模型估计经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)中给主治医师和助理医师的辐射剂量。为了实现这一点,在模拟的PCNL过程设置中使用蒙特卡罗N-Particle 6.2代码模拟了场景。根据前后位(AP)、右前斜30°(RAO30)和左前斜30°(LAO30)投影的不同,情况有所不同。身体质量指数(BMI)的变化是用两个虚拟的拟人模型来模拟的。利用这些不同的幻像来研究BMI因子对患者散射辐射的影响。本研究还评估了个人防护装备(PPE)和集体防护装备(CPE)对减少主治医师和助理医师辐射剂量的影响。医生和助理使用MASH3虚拟幻影进行模拟。模拟西门子SIREMOBIL Compact L型透视装置,所有场景下的管电压值为70 kV,场尺寸为11 × 11 cm2,实验角面积积为27 Gy⋅cm2。主医师的有效剂量范围为0.92 ~ 41.47 μSv。PPE和CPE的使用使有效剂量降低了94%。主治医师眼睛的等效剂量在0.172-7.34毫西弗范围内变化,使用个人防护用品和防护用品可使眼睛的剂量减少98%。辅助剂的有效剂量范围为0.33 ~ 13.49 μSv。在所有模拟场景中,主治医生接受的有效剂量比助理医生高71%。我们的研究发现,斜位投影导致主治医师的辐射暴露更高,与AP投影相比,la30投影的剂量增加了51%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Radiation Physics and Chemistry
Radiation Physics and Chemistry 化学-核科学技术
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
17.20%
发文量
574
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Radiation Physics and Chemistry is a multidisciplinary journal that provides a medium for publication of substantial and original papers, reviews, and short communications which focus on research and developments involving ionizing radiation in radiation physics, radiation chemistry and radiation processing. The journal aims to publish papers with significance to an international audience, containing substantial novelty and scientific impact. The Editors reserve the rights to reject, with or without external review, papers that do not meet these criteria. This could include papers that are very similar to previous publications, only with changed target substrates, employed materials, analyzed sites and experimental methods, report results without presenting new insights and/or hypothesis testing, or do not focus on the radiation effects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信