Absolute quantitation of neopterin as an endogenous pharmacodynamic Biomarker: The successful method development, validation, and use of a surrogate matrix for clinical sample analysis
Ryan De Palma, Murali Matta, Jeffry Florian, Vikram Patel, Rodney Rouse
{"title":"Absolute quantitation of neopterin as an endogenous pharmacodynamic Biomarker: The successful method development, validation, and use of a surrogate matrix for clinical sample analysis","authors":"Ryan De Palma, Murali Matta, Jeffry Florian, Vikram Patel, Rodney Rouse","doi":"10.1016/j.ab.2025.115893","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Biomarkers are playing an increasing role in the drug discovery and drug development process. Molecular biomarkers pose a bioanalytical challenge due to their low concentrations and endogenous presence. Inaccurate quantitation could lead to biased study results. Surrogate analyte and surrogate matrix approaches can be used to overcome the lack of a blank matrix and provide accurate quantitation. However, the suitability of the surrogate analyte or matrix must be established during method validation. Here we describe the development and validation of a surrogate matrix approach for the absolute quantitation of neopterin as a PD biomarker for use in an FDA-sponsored clinical study (NCT04183491). Matrix suitability was established through parallelism, precision and accuracy, and internal standard response. Parallelism experiments showed FBS, and serum had identical slopes 0.0145. Additionally, the difference in the X-intercepts was able to accurately predict the amount of endogenous neopterin (1.0 ng/mL). Inter-day accuracy across four surrogate QC levels ranged from 92.08 to 109.06 % while precision ranged from 3.36 to 16.00 %. Inter-day accuracy for the QCs in study matrix ranged from 96.81 to 108.86 % and precision ranged from 4.13 to 6.01 %. The internal standard response in FBS was only 6.9 % different from serum. Additionally, there was no matrix effect, injection carryover, or cross-analyte interference observed. The method was then qualified for automated sample processing.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7830,"journal":{"name":"Analytical biochemistry","volume":"704 ","pages":"Article 115893"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analytical biochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003269725001319","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Biomarkers are playing an increasing role in the drug discovery and drug development process. Molecular biomarkers pose a bioanalytical challenge due to their low concentrations and endogenous presence. Inaccurate quantitation could lead to biased study results. Surrogate analyte and surrogate matrix approaches can be used to overcome the lack of a blank matrix and provide accurate quantitation. However, the suitability of the surrogate analyte or matrix must be established during method validation. Here we describe the development and validation of a surrogate matrix approach for the absolute quantitation of neopterin as a PD biomarker for use in an FDA-sponsored clinical study (NCT04183491). Matrix suitability was established through parallelism, precision and accuracy, and internal standard response. Parallelism experiments showed FBS, and serum had identical slopes 0.0145. Additionally, the difference in the X-intercepts was able to accurately predict the amount of endogenous neopterin (1.0 ng/mL). Inter-day accuracy across four surrogate QC levels ranged from 92.08 to 109.06 % while precision ranged from 3.36 to 16.00 %. Inter-day accuracy for the QCs in study matrix ranged from 96.81 to 108.86 % and precision ranged from 4.13 to 6.01 %. The internal standard response in FBS was only 6.9 % different from serum. Additionally, there was no matrix effect, injection carryover, or cross-analyte interference observed. The method was then qualified for automated sample processing.
期刊介绍:
The journal''s title Analytical Biochemistry: Methods in the Biological Sciences declares its broad scope: methods for the basic biological sciences that include biochemistry, molecular genetics, cell biology, proteomics, immunology, bioinformatics and wherever the frontiers of research take the field.
The emphasis is on methods from the strictly analytical to the more preparative that would include novel approaches to protein purification as well as improvements in cell and organ culture. The actual techniques are equally inclusive ranging from aptamers to zymology.
The journal has been particularly active in:
-Analytical techniques for biological molecules-
Aptamer selection and utilization-
Biosensors-
Chromatography-
Cloning, sequencing and mutagenesis-
Electrochemical methods-
Electrophoresis-
Enzyme characterization methods-
Immunological approaches-
Mass spectrometry of proteins and nucleic acids-
Metabolomics-
Nano level techniques-
Optical spectroscopy in all its forms.
The journal is reluctant to include most drug and strictly clinical studies as there are more suitable publication platforms for these types of papers.