Evaluating environmental and economic sustainability of engineered chitosan particles for water treatment

Fatima Iqbal , Astha Upadhyay , Rouzbeh Tehrani , Lewis S. Rowles
{"title":"Evaluating environmental and economic sustainability of engineered chitosan particles for water treatment","authors":"Fatima Iqbal ,&nbsp;Astha Upadhyay ,&nbsp;Rouzbeh Tehrani ,&nbsp;Lewis S. Rowles","doi":"10.1016/j.clema.2025.100319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The global water demands have prompted the development of sustainable treatment solutions, with adsorptive chitosan composites emerging as promising alternatives to petroleum-based materials. As a cleaner material, chitosan offers significant advantages over conventional adsorbents, including biodegradability, biocompatibility, and the potential to create a circular economy in water treatment applications. This study presents a comprehensive sustainability assessment of three novel porous chitosan particles synthesized using low-toxicity solvents, focusing solely on the production of pure chitosan scaffolds without additional adsorptive materials for targeted removal. Integrating techno-economic analysis and life cycle assessment, we evaluate the economic viability and environmental impact of methylpentane, azocarboxamide, and tween porous chitosan particles. Our analysis, normalized to both production mass and methylene blue removal efficiency, reveals complex tradeoffs among costs, environmental impacts, and performance. Azocarboxamide particles was the most cost-effective in production at 32.89 [26.13-41.00] USD/g, while having greater environmental impacts and less removal (&lt; 20 %). In contrast, methylpentane particles demonstrated superior environmental sustainability, achieving a removal efficiency of &gt; 90 % with moderate production cost of 104.07 [80.76-135.07] USD/g. This divergence in results highlights the critical importance of considering both production costs and functional performance when evaluating the sustainability of these materials. Sensitivity analysis identified key sustainability drivers, including precursor costs, synthesis yield, material quantities, and energy consumption. These findings underscore the importance of optimizing synthesis conditions and considering full life cycle impacts in developing chitosan-based adsorbents. This study provides a robust framework for evaluating the sustainability of biopolymer-based materials and supports informed decision-making in advancing water treatment technologies and promoting a circular economy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100254,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Materials","volume":"16 ","pages":"Article 100319"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner Materials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772397625000280","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The global water demands have prompted the development of sustainable treatment solutions, with adsorptive chitosan composites emerging as promising alternatives to petroleum-based materials. As a cleaner material, chitosan offers significant advantages over conventional adsorbents, including biodegradability, biocompatibility, and the potential to create a circular economy in water treatment applications. This study presents a comprehensive sustainability assessment of three novel porous chitosan particles synthesized using low-toxicity solvents, focusing solely on the production of pure chitosan scaffolds without additional adsorptive materials for targeted removal. Integrating techno-economic analysis and life cycle assessment, we evaluate the economic viability and environmental impact of methylpentane, azocarboxamide, and tween porous chitosan particles. Our analysis, normalized to both production mass and methylene blue removal efficiency, reveals complex tradeoffs among costs, environmental impacts, and performance. Azocarboxamide particles was the most cost-effective in production at 32.89 [26.13-41.00] USD/g, while having greater environmental impacts and less removal (< 20 %). In contrast, methylpentane particles demonstrated superior environmental sustainability, achieving a removal efficiency of > 90 % with moderate production cost of 104.07 [80.76-135.07] USD/g. This divergence in results highlights the critical importance of considering both production costs and functional performance when evaluating the sustainability of these materials. Sensitivity analysis identified key sustainability drivers, including precursor costs, synthesis yield, material quantities, and energy consumption. These findings underscore the importance of optimizing synthesis conditions and considering full life cycle impacts in developing chitosan-based adsorbents. This study provides a robust framework for evaluating the sustainability of biopolymer-based materials and supports informed decision-making in advancing water treatment technologies and promoting a circular economy.

Abstract Image

评价工程壳聚糖水处理颗粒的环境和经济可持续性
全球对水的需求推动了可持续处理解决方案的发展,吸附壳聚糖复合材料成为石油基材料的有希望的替代品。作为一种清洁材料,壳聚糖与传统吸附剂相比具有显著的优势,包括生物可降解性、生物相容性以及在水处理应用中创造循环经济的潜力。本研究对使用低毒溶剂合成的三种新型多孔壳聚糖颗粒的可持续性进行了综合评估,重点关注纯壳聚糖支架的生产,而无需额外的吸附材料进行靶向去除。结合技术经济分析和生命周期评价,对甲基戊烷、偶氮甲酰胺和多孔壳聚糖颗粒的经济可行性和环境影响进行了评价。我们的分析,将生产量和亚甲基蓝去除效率归一化,揭示了成本、环境影响和性能之间的复杂权衡。偶氮甲酰胺颗粒在生产中最具成本效益,为32.89[26.13-41.00]美元/克,但对环境影响较大,去除率较低(<;20%)。相比之下,甲基戊烷颗粒表现出优异的环境可持续性,达到了>;90%,生产成本为104.07[80.76-135.07]美元/克。这种结果的差异突出了在评估这些材料的可持续性时考虑生产成本和功能性能的关键重要性。敏感性分析确定了关键的可持续性驱动因素,包括前体成本、合成产量、材料数量和能源消耗。这些发现强调了优化合成条件和考虑全生命周期影响在开发壳聚糖基吸附剂中的重要性。这项研究为评估生物聚合物基材料的可持续性提供了一个强有力的框架,并为推进水处理技术和促进循环经济的明智决策提供了支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信