Can self-paced learning improve judgments of learning accuracy ? Evidence from paired materials learning

IF 1.7 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, BIOLOGICAL
Peiyao Cong , Xiaojing Zhang , Yingjie Jiang
{"title":"Can self-paced learning improve judgments of learning accuracy ? Evidence from paired materials learning","authors":"Peiyao Cong ,&nbsp;Xiaojing Zhang ,&nbsp;Yingjie Jiang","doi":"10.1016/j.lmot.2025.102139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Enhancing students’ academic performance is an important concern among educators. Self-paced learning has been shown to improve memory performance, yet its role in promoting the accuracy of metacognitive monitoring remains to be investigated. This study systematically investigates how self-paced learning affects the accuracy of judgments of learning (JOLs) across different material types. Through two experiments, this study demonstrates that self-paced learning selectively enhances the resolution of delayed JOLs without significantly improving calibration. Notably, this enhancement effect shows robust stability across both word and image materials, with computational modeling revealing that increased decision thresholds serve as the core mechanism underlying this improvement. Our findings indicate that when learners control their study pace, they adopt more stringent monitoring criteria during delayed JOLs, particularly for materials requiring retrieval-based processing. These results not only clarify the specific pathway through which self-paced learning facilitates metacognitive monitoring but also provide empirical support for implementing delayed JOLs in educational settings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47305,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Motivation","volume":"91 ","pages":"Article 102139"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Motivation","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0023969025000463","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, BIOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Enhancing students’ academic performance is an important concern among educators. Self-paced learning has been shown to improve memory performance, yet its role in promoting the accuracy of metacognitive monitoring remains to be investigated. This study systematically investigates how self-paced learning affects the accuracy of judgments of learning (JOLs) across different material types. Through two experiments, this study demonstrates that self-paced learning selectively enhances the resolution of delayed JOLs without significantly improving calibration. Notably, this enhancement effect shows robust stability across both word and image materials, with computational modeling revealing that increased decision thresholds serve as the core mechanism underlying this improvement. Our findings indicate that when learners control their study pace, they adopt more stringent monitoring criteria during delayed JOLs, particularly for materials requiring retrieval-based processing. These results not only clarify the specific pathway through which self-paced learning facilitates metacognitive monitoring but also provide empirical support for implementing delayed JOLs in educational settings.
自定节奏学习能提高对学习准确性的判断吗?来自配对材料学习的证据
提高学生的学习成绩是教育工作者关注的一个重要问题。自定节奏学习已被证明可以改善记忆表现,但其在促进元认知监测准确性方面的作用仍有待研究。本研究系统地探讨了自主学习对不同材料类型的学习判断准确性的影响。通过两个实验,本研究表明,自定节奏学习选择性地提高了延迟JOLs的分辨率,但没有显著改善校准。值得注意的是,这种增强效果在文字和图像材料中都显示出强大的稳定性,计算模型显示,决策阈值的增加是这种改进的核心机制。我们的研究结果表明,当学习者控制他们的学习速度时,他们在延迟的JOLs中采用了更严格的监控标准,特别是对于需要基于检索的处理的材料。这些结果不仅阐明了自定节奏学习促进元认知监测的具体途径,而且为在教育环境中实施延迟JOLs提供了实证支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: Learning and Motivation features original experimental research devoted to the analysis of basic phenomena and mechanisms of learning, memory, and motivation. These studies, involving either animal or human subjects, examine behavioral, biological, and evolutionary influences on the learning and motivation processes, and often report on an integrated series of experiments that advance knowledge in this field. Theoretical papers and shorter reports are also considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信