Efficacy and safety of varenicline and bupropion, in combination and alone, for alcohol use disorder: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicentre trial

IF 13.6 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Bo Söderpalm , Helga Lidö , Johan Franck , Anders Håkansson , Daniel Lindqvist , Markus Heilig , Joar Guterstam , Markus Samuelson , Barbro Askerup , Cecilia Wallmark-Nilsson , Andrea de Bejczy
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of varenicline and bupropion, in combination and alone, for alcohol use disorder: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicentre trial","authors":"Bo Söderpalm ,&nbsp;Helga Lidö ,&nbsp;Johan Franck ,&nbsp;Anders Håkansson ,&nbsp;Daniel Lindqvist ,&nbsp;Markus Heilig ,&nbsp;Joar Guterstam ,&nbsp;Markus Samuelson ,&nbsp;Barbro Askerup ,&nbsp;Cecilia Wallmark-Nilsson ,&nbsp;Andrea de Bejczy","doi":"10.1016/j.lanepe.2025.101310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Alcohol use disorder (AUD) is associated with an enormous burden of disease and cost to society. The dopamine deficiency hypothesis posits that negative reinforcement generated by a low brain dopamine state drives ethanol intake. Here, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of combined administration of two dopamine-enhancing drugs, varenicline (a partial nicotinic acetylcholine receptor agonist) and bupropion (a weak dopamine-reuptake inhibitor) on alcohol intake in AUD.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Participants aged 25–70 years with moderate-to-severe AUD (defined as ≥4/11 Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders [DSM]-5 criteria) were enrolled in this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, done at four outpatient clinics in Sweden. Participants were randomly assigned (block size 8) 1:1:1:1 to Placebo + Placebo, Varenicline + Bupropion, Varenicline + Placebo, or Placebo + Bupropion. After a 1-week titration period, Varenicline was taken as 1 mg orally twice per day and bupropion as 150 mg orally twice per day for 12 weeks. Participants, investigators, and all study personnel were unaware of treatment allocation. The two primary outcomes were phosphatidylethanol in blood (B-PEth) and self-reported percentage heavy drinking days (%HDD), assessed over a steady state 10-week-period (from start of week 2 to end of week 11). Modified intention-to-treat (mITT) and per protocol analyses (PP) were performed using a sequential hierarchical statistical method. This registered study (EudraCT 2018–000048-24; <span><span>clinicaltrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg></span> <span><span>NCT04167306</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>) is completed.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Between March 4, 2019, and December 14, 2022, 384 participants were randomly assigned: Placebo + Placebo = 97, Varenicline + Bupropion = 100, Varenicline + Placebo = 96, Placebo + Bupropion = 91. 72% participants were male (277/384) and 28% female (107/384), median age 57 (13) years. In the mITT analyses, Varenicline + Bupropion reduced B-PEth (Cohen's d [d] = 0·39, p = 0·004) and %HDD (d = 0·31, p = 0·008) vs Placebo + Placebo. Varenicline + Placebo also reduced B-PEth (d = 0·30, p = 0·005) and %HDD (d = 0·36, p = 0·023) vs Placebo + Placebo. For both primary endpoints, differences between the Varenicline + Bupropion and Varenicline + Placebo groups were not statistically significant (B-PEth: d = 0·022, p = 0·97, %HDD: d = 0·027, p = 0·76), precluding further comparisons according to the statistical hierarchy. In PP analyses, both primary outcomes were reduced with Varenicline + Bupropion (d = 0·43 [B-PEth]; d = 0·41 [%HDD]) and Varenicline + Placebo (d = 0·29 [B-PEth]; d = 0·34 [%HDD]) compared with Placebo + Placebo. Nausea, the only safety concern, was more common in the Varenicline + Placebo group than in the Placebo + Placebo group (49/96 vs 11/97, p &lt; 0·0001) and of longer median duration (45 (70) vs 10 (14·5) days, p = 0·001). Nausea incidence was lower in the Varenicline + Bupropion group vs Varenicline + Placebo (36/100 vs 49/96, p = 0·048) and of shorter median duration (16·5 (39·3) vs 45 (70) days, p = 0·010).</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>Two brain dopamine elevating treatments (Varenicline + Bupropion; Varenicline + Placebo) reduce alcohol consumption compared with placebo alone. Effect sizes were largest when Varenicline and Bupropion were combined and compliance was high (PP-population). Bupropion reduced Varenicline-induced nausea. Varenicline + Bupropion or other mild dopamine enhancers should be further explored for treatment of AUD.</div></div><div><h3>Funding</h3><div>This study was funded primarily by the <span>Swedish Research Council</span>.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":53223,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Regional Health-Europe","volume":"54 ","pages":"Article 101310"},"PeriodicalIF":13.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Regional Health-Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666776225001024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Alcohol use disorder (AUD) is associated with an enormous burden of disease and cost to society. The dopamine deficiency hypothesis posits that negative reinforcement generated by a low brain dopamine state drives ethanol intake. Here, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of combined administration of two dopamine-enhancing drugs, varenicline (a partial nicotinic acetylcholine receptor agonist) and bupropion (a weak dopamine-reuptake inhibitor) on alcohol intake in AUD.

Methods

Participants aged 25–70 years with moderate-to-severe AUD (defined as ≥4/11 Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders [DSM]-5 criteria) were enrolled in this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, done at four outpatient clinics in Sweden. Participants were randomly assigned (block size 8) 1:1:1:1 to Placebo + Placebo, Varenicline + Bupropion, Varenicline + Placebo, or Placebo + Bupropion. After a 1-week titration period, Varenicline was taken as 1 mg orally twice per day and bupropion as 150 mg orally twice per day for 12 weeks. Participants, investigators, and all study personnel were unaware of treatment allocation. The two primary outcomes were phosphatidylethanol in blood (B-PEth) and self-reported percentage heavy drinking days (%HDD), assessed over a steady state 10-week-period (from start of week 2 to end of week 11). Modified intention-to-treat (mITT) and per protocol analyses (PP) were performed using a sequential hierarchical statistical method. This registered study (EudraCT 2018–000048-24; clinicaltrials.gov NCT04167306) is completed.

Findings

Between March 4, 2019, and December 14, 2022, 384 participants were randomly assigned: Placebo + Placebo = 97, Varenicline + Bupropion = 100, Varenicline + Placebo = 96, Placebo + Bupropion = 91. 72% participants were male (277/384) and 28% female (107/384), median age 57 (13) years. In the mITT analyses, Varenicline + Bupropion reduced B-PEth (Cohen's d [d] = 0·39, p = 0·004) and %HDD (d = 0·31, p = 0·008) vs Placebo + Placebo. Varenicline + Placebo also reduced B-PEth (d = 0·30, p = 0·005) and %HDD (d = 0·36, p = 0·023) vs Placebo + Placebo. For both primary endpoints, differences between the Varenicline + Bupropion and Varenicline + Placebo groups were not statistically significant (B-PEth: d = 0·022, p = 0·97, %HDD: d = 0·027, p = 0·76), precluding further comparisons according to the statistical hierarchy. In PP analyses, both primary outcomes were reduced with Varenicline + Bupropion (d = 0·43 [B-PEth]; d = 0·41 [%HDD]) and Varenicline + Placebo (d = 0·29 [B-PEth]; d = 0·34 [%HDD]) compared with Placebo + Placebo. Nausea, the only safety concern, was more common in the Varenicline + Placebo group than in the Placebo + Placebo group (49/96 vs 11/97, p < 0·0001) and of longer median duration (45 (70) vs 10 (14·5) days, p = 0·001). Nausea incidence was lower in the Varenicline + Bupropion group vs Varenicline + Placebo (36/100 vs 49/96, p = 0·048) and of shorter median duration (16·5 (39·3) vs 45 (70) days, p = 0·010).

Interpretation

Two brain dopamine elevating treatments (Varenicline + Bupropion; Varenicline + Placebo) reduce alcohol consumption compared with placebo alone. Effect sizes were largest when Varenicline and Bupropion were combined and compliance was high (PP-population). Bupropion reduced Varenicline-induced nausea. Varenicline + Bupropion or other mild dopamine enhancers should be further explored for treatment of AUD.

Funding

This study was funded primarily by the Swedish Research Council.
伐尼克兰和安非他酮联合或单独治疗酒精使用障碍的有效性和安全性:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的多中心试验
背景:酒精使用障碍(AUD)与巨大的疾病负担和社会成本相关。多巴胺缺乏假说认为,低多巴胺状态产生的负强化驱动了乙醇的摄入。在这里,我们评估了联合使用两种多巴胺增强药物——伐尼克兰(一种部分烟碱乙酰胆碱受体激动剂)和安非他酮(一种弱多巴胺再摄取抑制剂)对AUD患者酒精摄入的疗效和安全性。方法年龄在25-70岁,患有中度至重度AUD(定义为≥4/11精神障碍诊断与统计手册[DSM]-5标准)的受试者入组这项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验,在瑞典的四个门诊诊所进行。参与者被随机分配(分组大小8)1:1:1:1:1安慰剂+安慰剂、伐尼克兰+安非他酮、伐尼克兰+安慰剂或安慰剂+安非他酮。1周滴定期后,伐尼克兰1 mg / d口服2次,安非他酮150 mg / d口服2次,连续12周。参与者、研究者和所有研究人员都不知道治疗分配。两个主要结果是血液中的磷脂酰乙醇(B-PEth)和自我报告的重度饮酒天数百分比(%HDD),在稳定的10周期间(从第2周开始到第11周结束)进行评估。改进意向治疗(mITT)和每个方案分析(PP)使用顺序分层统计方法进行。本注册研究(EudraCT 2018-000048-24;clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04167306)已完成。在2019年3月4日至2022年12月14日期间,384名参与者被随机分配:安慰剂+安慰剂= 97,伐尼克兰+安非他酮= 100,伐尼克兰+安慰剂= 96,安慰剂+安非他酮= 91。72%的参与者为男性(277/384),28%为女性(107/384),中位年龄为57(13)岁。在mITT分析中,与安慰剂+安慰剂相比,伐尼克兰+安非他酮降低了B-PEth (Cohen's d [d] = 0.39, p = 0.004)和%HDD (d = 0.31, p = 0.008)。与安慰剂+安慰剂相比,伐尼克兰+安慰剂也降低了B-PEth (d = 0.30, p = 0.005)和%HDD (d = 0.36, p = 0.023)。对于两个主要终点,伐尼克兰+安非他酮组和伐尼克兰+安慰剂组之间的差异均无统计学意义(B-PEth: d = 0.022, p = 0.97, %HDD: d = 0.027, p = 0.76),根据统计学层次,排除了进一步比较。在PP分析中,伐尼克兰+安非他酮降低了这两个主要结局(d = 0.43 [B-PEth];d = 0.41 [%HDD])和伐尼克兰+安慰剂(d = 0.29 [B-PEth]);d = 0.34 [%HDD]),与安慰剂+安慰剂比较。恶心,唯一的安全问题,在伐尼克兰+安慰剂组比安慰剂+安慰剂组更常见(49/96 vs 11/97, p <;0.0001),中位持续时间更长(45(70)天和10(14.5)天,p = 0.001)。与伐尼克兰+安慰剂组相比,伐尼克兰+安非他酮组恶心发生率较低(36/100 vs 49/96, p = 0.048),中位持续时间较短(16.5 (39.3)vs 45(70)天,p = 0.010)。两种脑多巴胺升高治疗(伐尼克兰+安非他酮;Varenicline +安慰剂)与单独安慰剂相比减少酒精消耗。当伐尼克兰和安非他酮联合使用时,效应量最大,依从性高(PP-population)。安非他酮减少了伐仑克林引起的恶心。进一步探索伐尼克兰+安非他酮或其他轻度多巴胺增强剂治疗AUD。本研究主要由瑞典研究委员会资助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
19.90
自引率
1.40%
发文量
260
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: The Lancet Regional Health – Europe, a gold open access journal, is part of The Lancet's global effort to promote healthcare quality and accessibility worldwide. It focuses on advancing clinical practice and health policy in the European region to enhance health outcomes. The journal publishes high-quality original research advocating changes in clinical practice and health policy. It also includes reviews, commentaries, and opinion pieces on regional health topics, such as infection and disease prevention, healthy aging, and reducing health disparities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信