Carbon capture solvents for the applicability of rotating packed bed for industrial applications: Recent advancements, challenges and future recommendations

Mohammadu Bello Danbatta , Nasser Ahmed Al-Azri , Muhammad Abdul Qyyum , Nabeel Al-Rawahi
{"title":"Carbon capture solvents for the applicability of rotating packed bed for industrial applications: Recent advancements, challenges and future recommendations","authors":"Mohammadu Bello Danbatta ,&nbsp;Nasser Ahmed Al-Azri ,&nbsp;Muhammad Abdul Qyyum ,&nbsp;Nabeel Al-Rawahi","doi":"10.1016/j.ccst.2025.100426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Solvent selection is a critical aspect for industrial carbon capture, Rotating Packed Bed (RPB) is a promising technology that can be integrated to existing infrastructures, because of its compactness and enhanced mass transfer compare to traditional column beds. However, solvent cost, capture efficiency and energy regeneration is vital for industrial feasibility. Reviewing SCOPUS literature on carbon capture in RPB technology, findings reveal that 83.0 % of studies utilized Carbon dioxide without other pollutants, predominantly using Monoethanolamine as solvent. Across studies, capture efficiencies of 99.0 % reported under varying parameters; Methyldiethanolamine, a tertiary amine, has 99.8 % efficiency and blended amines such as Diethylenetriamine-Piperazine and Methylmonoethanolamine-Piperazine have efficiencies of 99.6 % and 99.4 %, respectively. Identifying the most promising solvents for each industry is crucial. However, there is a significant gap in the selection of optimum solvent for specific industrial application. While amines are commonly used, systematic studies that evaluate a broader range of solvents under diverse operational conditions for specific industrial applications are lacking. The application of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in solvent screening for carbon capture can accelerate adoption and drive commercial utilization. AI solvent screening integration in RPB for industrial use remains underexplored. Addressing these gaps is crucial for identifying solvents that maximize capture efficiency and lower regeneration energy cost. This review presents the current state of solvents in RPB, reflects on challenges, possible scientific developments and future recommendations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9387,"journal":{"name":"Carbon Capture Science & Technology","volume":"15 ","pages":"Article 100426"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Carbon Capture Science & Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277265682500065X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Solvent selection is a critical aspect for industrial carbon capture, Rotating Packed Bed (RPB) is a promising technology that can be integrated to existing infrastructures, because of its compactness and enhanced mass transfer compare to traditional column beds. However, solvent cost, capture efficiency and energy regeneration is vital for industrial feasibility. Reviewing SCOPUS literature on carbon capture in RPB technology, findings reveal that 83.0 % of studies utilized Carbon dioxide without other pollutants, predominantly using Monoethanolamine as solvent. Across studies, capture efficiencies of 99.0 % reported under varying parameters; Methyldiethanolamine, a tertiary amine, has 99.8 % efficiency and blended amines such as Diethylenetriamine-Piperazine and Methylmonoethanolamine-Piperazine have efficiencies of 99.6 % and 99.4 %, respectively. Identifying the most promising solvents for each industry is crucial. However, there is a significant gap in the selection of optimum solvent for specific industrial application. While amines are commonly used, systematic studies that evaluate a broader range of solvents under diverse operational conditions for specific industrial applications are lacking. The application of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in solvent screening for carbon capture can accelerate adoption and drive commercial utilization. AI solvent screening integration in RPB for industrial use remains underexplored. Addressing these gaps is crucial for identifying solvents that maximize capture efficiency and lower regeneration energy cost. This review presents the current state of solvents in RPB, reflects on challenges, possible scientific developments and future recommendations.

Abstract Image

适用于工业应用的旋转填料床的碳捕获溶剂:最近的进展,挑战和未来的建议
溶剂选择是工业碳捕集的一个关键方面,旋转填料床(RPB)是一项很有前途的技术,可以集成到现有的基础设施中,因为与传统的柱床相比,它具有紧凑性和增强的传质能力。然而,溶剂成本、捕获效率和能量再生对工业可行性至关重要。回顾SCOPUS关于RPB技术中碳捕获的文献,发现83.0%的研究使用二氧化碳而不使用其他污染物,主要使用单乙醇胺作为溶剂。在研究中,不同参数下的捕获效率为99.0%;叔胺甲基二乙醇胺的效率为99.8%,混合胺如二乙基三胺-哌嗪和甲基单乙醇胺-哌嗪的效率分别为99.6%和99.4%。确定每个行业最有前途的溶剂是至关重要的。然而,在特定工业应用的最佳溶剂选择方面存在很大差距。虽然胺是常用的溶剂,但缺乏在不同操作条件下对特定工业应用的更广泛溶剂进行评估的系统研究。人工智能(AI)在碳捕获溶剂筛选中的应用可以加速采用并推动商业利用。人工智能溶剂筛选集成在工业用途的RPB仍未充分探索。解决这些差距对于确定最大限度地提高捕获效率和降低再生能源成本的溶剂至关重要。本文介绍了RPB中溶剂的现状,反映了面临的挑战,可能的科学发展和未来的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信