Severe Legionnaires’ disease refractory to azithromycin: Are quinolones superior to macrolides?

IF 1 Q4 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
IDCases Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.idcr.2025.e02242
Luqman Croal-Abrahams, Folasade Arinze
{"title":"Severe Legionnaires’ disease refractory to azithromycin: Are quinolones superior to macrolides?","authors":"Luqman Croal-Abrahams,&nbsp;Folasade Arinze","doi":"10.1016/j.idcr.2025.e02242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Legionnaires’ disease is typically treated with either a macrolide or fluoroquinolone. Antimicrobial sensitivity testing of clinical samples is not routinely done because <em>Legionella</em> is difficult to culture. Controlled trials to suggest non-inferiority of either class are limited. We present a case of a 43-year-old immunosuppressed man with severe <em>Legionella</em> pneumonia whose clinical course was complicated by persistent fevers, acute metabolic encephalopathy, septic shock, rhabdomyolysis, and acute kidney injury while on azithromycin. He rapidly improved after a switch to levofloxacin. The current guidelines recommend either using a quinolone or macrolide for <em>Legionella</em> pneumonia. However, there are conflicting data suggestive of a benefit of quinolones over macrolides. Our case prompts the question of optimal antibiotic choice in cases of severe Legionnaires’ disease in immunocompromised patients and highlights the need for randomized controlled trials for further guidance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47045,"journal":{"name":"IDCases","volume":"40 ","pages":"Article e02242"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IDCases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214250925000988","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Legionnaires’ disease is typically treated with either a macrolide or fluoroquinolone. Antimicrobial sensitivity testing of clinical samples is not routinely done because Legionella is difficult to culture. Controlled trials to suggest non-inferiority of either class are limited. We present a case of a 43-year-old immunosuppressed man with severe Legionella pneumonia whose clinical course was complicated by persistent fevers, acute metabolic encephalopathy, septic shock, rhabdomyolysis, and acute kidney injury while on azithromycin. He rapidly improved after a switch to levofloxacin. The current guidelines recommend either using a quinolone or macrolide for Legionella pneumonia. However, there are conflicting data suggestive of a benefit of quinolones over macrolides. Our case prompts the question of optimal antibiotic choice in cases of severe Legionnaires’ disease in immunocompromised patients and highlights the need for randomized controlled trials for further guidance.
阿奇霉素难治性严重军团病:喹诺酮类药物优于大环内酯类药物吗?
军团病通常用大环内酯类药物或氟喹诺酮类药物治疗。由于军团菌难以培养,临床样品的抗菌药物敏感性测试没有常规进行。表明这两类非劣效性的对照试验是有限的。我们报告一个43岁的免疫抑制男性严重军团菌肺炎的病例,其临床过程并发持续发热,急性代谢性脑病,感染性休克,横纹肌溶解和急性肾损伤,同时使用阿奇霉素。改用左氧氟沙星后病情迅速好转。目前的指南建议使用喹诺酮类药物或大环内酯类药物治疗军团菌肺炎。然而,有相互矛盾的数据表明喹诺酮类药物优于大环内酯类药物。我们的病例提示了在免疫功能低下患者的严重军团病病例中选择最佳抗生素的问题,并强调需要进行随机对照试验以进一步指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IDCases
IDCases INFECTIOUS DISEASES-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
300
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信