The effects of multidimensional treatment foster care for maltreated children and adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Andrea Krishnapillai , Lindsay Oad , Taylar Cassidy , Melissa Kimber , Nancy Santesso
{"title":"The effects of multidimensional treatment foster care for maltreated children and adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Andrea Krishnapillai ,&nbsp;Lindsay Oad ,&nbsp;Taylar Cassidy ,&nbsp;Melissa Kimber ,&nbsp;Nancy Santesso","doi":"10.1016/j.chipro.2025.100173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>A significant proportion of youth in foster care have a history of child maltreatment (CM) exposure, which contributes to their elevated risk for experiencing emotional and behavioural disorders.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To update a previously published systematic review and meta-analysis examining the effects of Multidimensional Treatment Foster Care (MTFC) on the well-being of maltreated youth in foster care.</div></div><div><h3>Participants and setting</h3><div>Children between 3 and 17 years of age exposed to any type of CM by their birth parents.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Systematic searches across five databases retrieved randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the impact of MTFC. We assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool and certainty of the evidence using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations approach.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Eight RCTs were included. Meta-analyses indicated that MTFC may have little to no greater effect on internalizing symptoms at 5–6 months but may slightly reduce externalizing symptoms at 3–12 months compared to usual care. MTFC's long-term effects on these outcomes is still uncertain. There is very little and uncertain evidence regarding the difference in effects of MTFC compared to usual care interventions on suicide attempts or ideation, involvement with authority, and positive parent-child interactions.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>MTFC may have no additional benefits for children exposed to maltreatment. Decision makers must balance these findings with costs, resources, and training required to provide MTFC to this population compared to usual care. Quality RCTs that measure long-term outcomes, and which integrate the perspectives of children who receive MTFC, are needed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100237,"journal":{"name":"Child Protection and Practice","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100173"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child Protection and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950193825000804","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

A significant proportion of youth in foster care have a history of child maltreatment (CM) exposure, which contributes to their elevated risk for experiencing emotional and behavioural disorders.

Objective

To update a previously published systematic review and meta-analysis examining the effects of Multidimensional Treatment Foster Care (MTFC) on the well-being of maltreated youth in foster care.

Participants and setting

Children between 3 and 17 years of age exposed to any type of CM by their birth parents.

Methods

Systematic searches across five databases retrieved randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the impact of MTFC. We assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool and certainty of the evidence using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations approach.

Results

Eight RCTs were included. Meta-analyses indicated that MTFC may have little to no greater effect on internalizing symptoms at 5–6 months but may slightly reduce externalizing symptoms at 3–12 months compared to usual care. MTFC's long-term effects on these outcomes is still uncertain. There is very little and uncertain evidence regarding the difference in effects of MTFC compared to usual care interventions on suicide attempts or ideation, involvement with authority, and positive parent-child interactions.

Conclusions

MTFC may have no additional benefits for children exposed to maltreatment. Decision makers must balance these findings with costs, resources, and training required to provide MTFC to this population compared to usual care. Quality RCTs that measure long-term outcomes, and which integrate the perspectives of children who receive MTFC, are needed.
多维治疗寄养对受虐待儿童和青少年的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析
很大一部分寄养青少年有儿童虐待史,这增加了他们经历情绪和行为障碍的风险。目的更新先前发表的一项系统综述和荟萃分析,研究多维治疗寄养(MTFC)对寄养中受虐待青年幸福感的影响。3至17岁的儿童由其亲生父母暴露于任何类型的CM。方法系统检索5个数据库检索的随机对照试验(RCTs),评估MTFC的影响。我们使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具评估偏倚风险,使用分级推荐、评估、发展和评估方法评估证据的确定性。结果共纳入8项rct。荟萃分析表明,与常规护理相比,MTFC在5-6个月时对内化症状的影响可能很小或没有更大的影响,但在3-12个月时可能会略微减少外化症状。MTFC对这些结果的长期影响仍不确定。与常规护理干预相比,MTFC在自杀企图或念头、与权威的参与和积极的亲子互动方面的影响差异很少,证据也不确定。结论smtfc对遭受虐待的儿童可能没有额外的益处。决策者必须将这些发现与向这一人群提供MTFC所需的成本、资源和培训相平衡,而不是与常规护理相比较。需要高质量的随机对照试验来衡量长期结果,并整合接受MTFC的儿童的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信