{"title":"Owing others: debt, welfare tradeoffs, and the social emotions","authors":"Maria Brackin , Hugo Mercier","doi":"10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2025.106690","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Borrowing money – whether from informal or formal sources – is a common and fundamental aspect of our economic lives. Although evidence shows that people can exhibit strong emotional reactions to monetary debt, and that these emotions relate to their borrowing decisions, not much is known about which emotions are triggered and why. Here, we use the framework of social emotions to suggest that: (i) social emotions, in particular guilt, gratitude, and indebtedness, emerge in the context of borrowing in response to information about the costs to the lender and the benefits to the borrower, and the Welfare Tradeoff Ratios (WTRs) of both actors, (ii) varying WTRs in debt scenarios elicit the emotional responses predicted by the social emotions framework, and (iii) social emotions are related to borrowing decisions in hypothetical scenarios. We examine the role of social emotions in borrowing in three online studies with U.S. participants. Study 1 (<em>N</em> = 268) shows that social emotions emerge consistently in borrowing scenarios and respond to welfare tradeoffs. Study 2 (<em>N</em> = 190) suggests that the emotion of indebtedness can arise either from increases in guilt or in gratitude. Study 3 (<em>N</em> = 150) shows that people are willing to impose extra costs on themselves when making borrowing choices, presumably to decrease negative emotions. Taken together, the studies suggest that using the social emotions framework helps make sense of emotional responses to debt, and could further our understanding of borrowing and repayment decisions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55159,"journal":{"name":"Evolution and Human Behavior","volume":"46 4","pages":"Article 106690"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evolution and Human Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S109051382500039X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Borrowing money – whether from informal or formal sources – is a common and fundamental aspect of our economic lives. Although evidence shows that people can exhibit strong emotional reactions to monetary debt, and that these emotions relate to their borrowing decisions, not much is known about which emotions are triggered and why. Here, we use the framework of social emotions to suggest that: (i) social emotions, in particular guilt, gratitude, and indebtedness, emerge in the context of borrowing in response to information about the costs to the lender and the benefits to the borrower, and the Welfare Tradeoff Ratios (WTRs) of both actors, (ii) varying WTRs in debt scenarios elicit the emotional responses predicted by the social emotions framework, and (iii) social emotions are related to borrowing decisions in hypothetical scenarios. We examine the role of social emotions in borrowing in three online studies with U.S. participants. Study 1 (N = 268) shows that social emotions emerge consistently in borrowing scenarios and respond to welfare tradeoffs. Study 2 (N = 190) suggests that the emotion of indebtedness can arise either from increases in guilt or in gratitude. Study 3 (N = 150) shows that people are willing to impose extra costs on themselves when making borrowing choices, presumably to decrease negative emotions. Taken together, the studies suggest that using the social emotions framework helps make sense of emotional responses to debt, and could further our understanding of borrowing and repayment decisions.
期刊介绍:
Evolution and Human Behavior is an interdisciplinary journal, presenting research reports and theory in which evolutionary perspectives are brought to bear on the study of human behavior. It is primarily a scientific journal, but submissions from scholars in the humanities are also encouraged. Papers reporting on theoretical and empirical work on other species will be welcome if their relevance to the human animal is apparent.