{"title":"Analyzing the impact of synergistic environmental regulations and local government competition on carbon neutrality goals","authors":"Jun Zhao , Lelai Shi","doi":"10.1016/j.jik.2025.100716","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Integration and synergy of environmental policies is crucial for maximizing carbon reduction effects. This study investigates the heterogeneous impact of environmental policy synergy on carbon neutrality using panel data from 30 Chinese provinces between 2003 and 2022 and employing generalized quantile regression and spatial econometric models. The relevant findings are threefold. (1) The marginal impact of environmental policy synergy on per capita carbon emissions exhibits distinct structural characteristics across different positions in the conditional distribution of China’s per capita carbon emissions. (2) Significant heterogeneity is evident in the effects of various environmental policy synergy categories on carbon neutrality. Specifically, synergies between government and enterprise environmental regulation (ER), and government-and public-type ER effectively reduces per capita carbon emissions, contributing to carbon neutrality. In contrast, the synergy between enterprise and public-type ER policies increases per capita carbon emissions, while the synergy between all three types of ER policies does not significantly impact carbon emissions. (3) The direct effect of local government competition on per capita carbon emissions is negligible; however, government and corporate policy synergy results in increased per capita carbon emissions under government competition. This study reveals the heterogeneous effects of policy combinations, providing a dynamic decision-making basis for optimizing policy instruments in achieving carbon peaking and carbon neutrality.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46792,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Innovation & Knowledge","volume":"10 3","pages":"Article 100716"},"PeriodicalIF":15.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Innovation & Knowledge","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2444569X25000666","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Integration and synergy of environmental policies is crucial for maximizing carbon reduction effects. This study investigates the heterogeneous impact of environmental policy synergy on carbon neutrality using panel data from 30 Chinese provinces between 2003 and 2022 and employing generalized quantile regression and spatial econometric models. The relevant findings are threefold. (1) The marginal impact of environmental policy synergy on per capita carbon emissions exhibits distinct structural characteristics across different positions in the conditional distribution of China’s per capita carbon emissions. (2) Significant heterogeneity is evident in the effects of various environmental policy synergy categories on carbon neutrality. Specifically, synergies between government and enterprise environmental regulation (ER), and government-and public-type ER effectively reduces per capita carbon emissions, contributing to carbon neutrality. In contrast, the synergy between enterprise and public-type ER policies increases per capita carbon emissions, while the synergy between all three types of ER policies does not significantly impact carbon emissions. (3) The direct effect of local government competition on per capita carbon emissions is negligible; however, government and corporate policy synergy results in increased per capita carbon emissions under government competition. This study reveals the heterogeneous effects of policy combinations, providing a dynamic decision-making basis for optimizing policy instruments in achieving carbon peaking and carbon neutrality.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Innovation and Knowledge (JIK) explores how innovation drives knowledge creation and vice versa, emphasizing that not all innovation leads to knowledge, but enduring innovation across diverse fields fosters theory and knowledge. JIK invites papers on innovations enhancing or generating knowledge, covering innovation processes, structures, outcomes, and behaviors at various levels. Articles in JIK examine knowledge-related changes promoting innovation for societal best practices.
JIK serves as a platform for high-quality studies undergoing double-blind peer review, ensuring global dissemination to scholars, practitioners, and policymakers who recognize innovation and knowledge as economic drivers. It publishes theoretical articles, empirical studies, case studies, reviews, and other content, addressing current trends and emerging topics in innovation and knowledge. The journal welcomes suggestions for special issues and encourages articles to showcase contextual differences and lessons for a broad audience.
In essence, JIK is an interdisciplinary journal dedicated to advancing theoretical and practical innovations and knowledge across multiple fields, including Economics, Business and Management, Engineering, Science, and Education.