Systematic review on uncertainty quantification in machine learning-based building energy modeling

IF 16.3 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
X. Xu , Y. Hu , S. Atamturktur , L. Chen , J. Wang
{"title":"Systematic review on uncertainty quantification in machine learning-based building energy modeling","authors":"X. Xu ,&nbsp;Y. Hu ,&nbsp;S. Atamturktur ,&nbsp;L. Chen ,&nbsp;J. Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.rser.2025.115817","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Uncertainty quantification (UQ) has received increasing attention for improving the reliability, transparency, and robustness of machine learning (ML)-based building energy modeling (BEM). As ML methods are widely integrated into BEM applications, there is a growing need for a structured and comprehensive understanding of UQ implementations in ML-based BEM. This paper addresses this gap by presenting a thorough review of literatures at the intersection of ML, BEM, and UQ, guided by a systematic literature search using a Keyword Synonym Search strategy. First, three primary sources of uncertainty are identified in ML-based BEM, which are building system operations, building simulation tools, and ML models. The contributing factors of these sources are further categorized into aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty. The review then examines ten state-of-the-art UQ techniques, respectively ensemble modeling, prior network, Bayesian neural networks, Markov Chain Monte Carlo, variational inference, dropout networks, Bayes by Backprop, Bayesian active learning, variational autoencoders, and Gaussian process. Each UQ technique is reviewed in terms of its modeling principles and applications within ML-based BEM. The discussion offers critical insights into the necessity, practical implementation, comparative performance, and research gaps of UQ in ML-based BEM. Five research challenges are discussed, such as the underrepresentation of aleatoric uncertainty in building datasets and limited adoptions of advanced UQ techniques within ML-based BEM. Finally, this review concludes with recommendations for future research to support the development of uncertainty-aware ML-based BEMs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":418,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","volume":"218 ","pages":"Article 115817"},"PeriodicalIF":16.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032125004903","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Uncertainty quantification (UQ) has received increasing attention for improving the reliability, transparency, and robustness of machine learning (ML)-based building energy modeling (BEM). As ML methods are widely integrated into BEM applications, there is a growing need for a structured and comprehensive understanding of UQ implementations in ML-based BEM. This paper addresses this gap by presenting a thorough review of literatures at the intersection of ML, BEM, and UQ, guided by a systematic literature search using a Keyword Synonym Search strategy. First, three primary sources of uncertainty are identified in ML-based BEM, which are building system operations, building simulation tools, and ML models. The contributing factors of these sources are further categorized into aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty. The review then examines ten state-of-the-art UQ techniques, respectively ensemble modeling, prior network, Bayesian neural networks, Markov Chain Monte Carlo, variational inference, dropout networks, Bayes by Backprop, Bayesian active learning, variational autoencoders, and Gaussian process. Each UQ technique is reviewed in terms of its modeling principles and applications within ML-based BEM. The discussion offers critical insights into the necessity, practical implementation, comparative performance, and research gaps of UQ in ML-based BEM. Five research challenges are discussed, such as the underrepresentation of aleatoric uncertainty in building datasets and limited adoptions of advanced UQ techniques within ML-based BEM. Finally, this review concludes with recommendations for future research to support the development of uncertainty-aware ML-based BEMs.
基于机器学习的建筑能源建模中不确定性量化的系统综述
不确定性量化(UQ)因提高基于机器学习(ML)的建筑能源建模(BEM)的可靠性、透明度和鲁棒性而受到越来越多的关注。由于ML方法被广泛集成到BEM应用程序中,因此越来越需要对基于ML的BEM中的UQ实现进行结构化和全面的理解。本文通过对ML、BEM和UQ交叉领域的文献进行全面回顾,并使用关键字同义词搜索策略进行系统文献搜索,从而解决了这一差距。首先,在基于ML的BEM中确定了三个主要的不确定性来源,即构建系统操作、构建仿真工具和ML模型。这些来源的影响因素进一步分为任意不确定性和认知不确定性。然后回顾了十种最先进的UQ技术,分别是集成建模、先验网络、贝叶斯神经网络、马尔可夫链蒙特卡罗、变分推理、辍学网络、贝叶斯Backprop、贝叶斯主动学习、变分自编码器和高斯过程。每一种UQ技术都根据其建模原理和基于ml的BEM中的应用进行了回顾。讨论对基于ml的BEM中UQ的必要性、实际实施、比较性能和研究差距提供了重要的见解。讨论了五个研究挑战,例如在构建数据集时任意不确定性的代表性不足,以及在基于ml的BEM中有限地采用先进的UQ技术。最后,本文总结了对未来研究的建议,以支持不确定性感知的基于ml的bem的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
31.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
1055
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The mission of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is to disseminate the most compelling and pertinent critical insights in renewable and sustainable energy, fostering collaboration among the research community, private sector, and policy and decision makers. The journal aims to exchange challenges, solutions, innovative concepts, and technologies, contributing to sustainable development, the transition to a low-carbon future, and the attainment of emissions targets outlined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews publishes a diverse range of content, including review papers, original research, case studies, and analyses of new technologies, all featuring a substantial review component such as critique, comparison, or analysis. Introducing a distinctive paper type, Expert Insights, the journal presents commissioned mini-reviews authored by field leaders, addressing topics of significant interest. Case studies undergo consideration only if they showcase the work's applicability to other regions or contribute valuable insights to the broader field of renewable and sustainable energy. Notably, a bibliographic or literature review lacking critical analysis is deemed unsuitable for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信