Habit-based interventions for maintaining reduction in disposable cutlery usage: A longitudinal experiment

IF 7.1 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Yali Huang , Xiaoling Zhang , Xushan Sheng , Liyin Shen , Kenneth Mei Yee Leung
{"title":"Habit-based interventions for maintaining reduction in disposable cutlery usage: A longitudinal experiment","authors":"Yali Huang ,&nbsp;Xiaoling Zhang ,&nbsp;Xushan Sheng ,&nbsp;Liyin Shen ,&nbsp;Kenneth Mei Yee Leung","doi":"10.1016/j.wasman.2025.114862","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Adherence to long-term environmental behaviors is challenging, with unclear mechanisms for success. To address this, the presented study advances environmental behavior research by applying habit formation strategies, previously used in health interventions, to the issue of disposable cutlery usage—a major source of plastic waste. Unlike traditional incentives or nudges, it tests the effectiveness of contextual cues (e.g., reusable cutlery provision) combined with reinforcement techniques like reminders and goal-setting.</div><div>Utilizing a comprehensive dataset from a three-month longitudinal experiment, comprising 20,763 panel observations and employing a marginalized two-part model, we found that both the ‘context &amp; fixed reminder’ and ‘context &amp; random reminder’ interventions significantly reduced disposable cutlery usage by nearly 50%. Implementing this framework across Chinese universities could potentially reduce disposable cutlery usage by 1.22 billion sets and prevent 18.2 million tons of waste per year. In comparison, the ‘context only’ was less effective, highlighting the significance of reinforcement. Notably, the ‘context &amp; goal’ intervention proved more effective in the later stages of the experiment, suggesting that recalling goals can significantly impact behavior over time. Furthermore, we found that the effectiveness of the ‘context &amp; fixed reminder’ intervention was significantly moderated by perceived complexity, whereas the moderation effect was insignificant for the ’context &amp; random reminder’ intervention, emphasizing that reminder frequency should match task complexity to enhance individuals’ engagement—a critical insight previously missing from the literature. Overall, these findings enhance both theoretical understanding and practical applications in habit-based interventions for environmental behavior change and maintenance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23969,"journal":{"name":"Waste management","volume":"203 ","pages":"Article 114862"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Waste management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0956053X25002739","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Adherence to long-term environmental behaviors is challenging, with unclear mechanisms for success. To address this, the presented study advances environmental behavior research by applying habit formation strategies, previously used in health interventions, to the issue of disposable cutlery usage—a major source of plastic waste. Unlike traditional incentives or nudges, it tests the effectiveness of contextual cues (e.g., reusable cutlery provision) combined with reinforcement techniques like reminders and goal-setting.
Utilizing a comprehensive dataset from a three-month longitudinal experiment, comprising 20,763 panel observations and employing a marginalized two-part model, we found that both the ‘context & fixed reminder’ and ‘context & random reminder’ interventions significantly reduced disposable cutlery usage by nearly 50%. Implementing this framework across Chinese universities could potentially reduce disposable cutlery usage by 1.22 billion sets and prevent 18.2 million tons of waste per year. In comparison, the ‘context only’ was less effective, highlighting the significance of reinforcement. Notably, the ‘context & goal’ intervention proved more effective in the later stages of the experiment, suggesting that recalling goals can significantly impact behavior over time. Furthermore, we found that the effectiveness of the ‘context & fixed reminder’ intervention was significantly moderated by perceived complexity, whereas the moderation effect was insignificant for the ’context & random reminder’ intervention, emphasizing that reminder frequency should match task complexity to enhance individuals’ engagement—a critical insight previously missing from the literature. Overall, these findings enhance both theoretical understanding and practical applications in habit-based interventions for environmental behavior change and maintenance.

Abstract Image

以习惯为基础的干预维持减少一次性餐具的使用:一项纵向实验
坚持长期的环保行为具有挑战性,成功的机制尚不清楚。为了解决这个问题,本研究通过将习惯形成策略(以前用于健康干预)应用于一次性餐具的使用问题(塑料废物的主要来源)来推进环境行为研究。与传统的激励或推动不同,它测试了情境线索(例如,提供可重复使用的餐具)与提醒和目标设定等强化技术相结合的有效性。利用为期三个月的纵向实验的综合数据集,包括20,763个面板观察结果,并采用边缘化的两部分模型,我们发现“背景&;固定提醒‘和’ context &;随机提醒的干预措施显著减少了近50%的一次性餐具使用量。在中国高校实施这一框架,每年可减少一次性餐具的使用12.2亿套,避免浪费1820万吨。相比之下,“仅限情境”的效果较差,突出了强化的重要性。值得注意的是,“上下文”在实验的后期阶段,目标干预被证明更为有效,这表明回忆目标可以随着时间的推移显著影响行为。此外,我们发现“语境”的有效性“固定提醒”干预被感知复杂性显著调节,而“情境”干预的调节作用不显著;随机提醒干预,强调提醒频率应该与任务复杂性相匹配,以提高个人的参与度——这是以前文献中缺失的关键见解。总的来说,这些发现增强了基于习惯的环境行为改变和维持干预的理论认识和实际应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Waste management
Waste management 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
6.20%
发文量
492
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: Waste Management is devoted to the presentation and discussion of information on solid wastes,it covers the entire lifecycle of solid. wastes. Scope: Addresses solid wastes in both industrialized and economically developing countries Covers various types of solid wastes, including: Municipal (e.g., residential, institutional, commercial, light industrial) Agricultural Special (e.g., C and D, healthcare, household hazardous wastes, sewage sludge)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信