Particle Transport and Building Ventilation Limit Indoor Air Cleaner Performance during Wildfire Smoke Events

IF 8.8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Jienan Li, Kathryn J. Mayer, Andrew B. Martin, Stephen M. Zimmerman, Dustin G. Poppendieck, Marina E. Vance and Delphine K. Farmer*, 
{"title":"Particle Transport and Building Ventilation Limit Indoor Air Cleaner Performance during Wildfire Smoke Events","authors":"Jienan Li,&nbsp;Kathryn J. Mayer,&nbsp;Andrew B. Martin,&nbsp;Stephen M. Zimmerman,&nbsp;Dustin G. Poppendieck,&nbsp;Marina E. Vance and Delphine K. Farmer*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.estlett.4c0093110.1021/acs.estlett.4c00931","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Portable air cleaners (PACs) are often recommended to mitigate indoor particulate matter levels during wildfire smoke events. These devices can remove smoke particles by using mechanical filters or mechanisms that add energy or chemicals. However, the efficacy of PACs is typically evaluated by manufacturers in confined laboratory settings with pulse inputs rather than multizone buildings with constant sources. Here we use data collected in a test house to investigate how building characteristics, such as the presence of multiple zones, the outdoor air change rate, and air recirculation rate within multiple zones, impact PAC performance when removing indoor particles. Results show that while the tested PAC can remove 90% of pulse-introduced particles within 2 h in a sealed house, simulating a wildfire smoke event with constant infiltration of outdoor PM<sub>2.5</sub> yields steady-state cleaning effectiveness of 70%, 45%, and 55% at different locations of the house. We provide evidence-based recommendations for using PACs to reduce the concentrations of infiltrating PM<sub>2.5</sub> from outdoor air pollution, such as wildfire smoke or urban smog.</p>","PeriodicalId":37,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Technology Letters Environ.","volume":"12 5","pages":"573–579 573–579"},"PeriodicalIF":8.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science & Technology Letters Environ.","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.estlett.4c00931","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Portable air cleaners (PACs) are often recommended to mitigate indoor particulate matter levels during wildfire smoke events. These devices can remove smoke particles by using mechanical filters or mechanisms that add energy or chemicals. However, the efficacy of PACs is typically evaluated by manufacturers in confined laboratory settings with pulse inputs rather than multizone buildings with constant sources. Here we use data collected in a test house to investigate how building characteristics, such as the presence of multiple zones, the outdoor air change rate, and air recirculation rate within multiple zones, impact PAC performance when removing indoor particles. Results show that while the tested PAC can remove 90% of pulse-introduced particles within 2 h in a sealed house, simulating a wildfire smoke event with constant infiltration of outdoor PM2.5 yields steady-state cleaning effectiveness of 70%, 45%, and 55% at different locations of the house. We provide evidence-based recommendations for using PACs to reduce the concentrations of infiltrating PM2.5 from outdoor air pollution, such as wildfire smoke or urban smog.

Abstract Image

在野火烟雾事件中,颗粒传输和建筑物通风限制了室内空气净化器的性能
便携式空气净化器(PACs)经常被推荐用于减少野火烟雾事件期间室内颗粒物水平。这些设备可以通过使用机械过滤器或添加能量或化学物质的机制来去除烟雾颗粒。然而,PACs的功效通常由制造商在具有脉冲输入的受限实验室环境中评估,而不是在具有恒定源的多区域建筑物中评估。在这里,我们使用在测试房屋中收集的数据来研究建筑特征,例如多个区域的存在,室外空气换气率和多个区域内的空气再循环率,如何影响PAC在去除室内颗粒时的性能。结果表明,在密闭的房屋中,所测试的PAC可以在2小时内去除90%的脉冲引入颗粒,而模拟室外PM2.5持续渗入的野火烟雾事件,在房屋不同位置的稳态清洁效率分别为70%、45%和55%。我们提供了基于证据的建议,建议使用pac来降低来自户外空气污染(如野火烟雾或城市烟雾)的渗透PM2.5浓度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Science & Technology Letters Environ.
Environmental Science & Technology Letters Environ. ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTALENVIRONMENTAL SC-ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
CiteScore
17.90
自引率
3.70%
发文量
163
期刊介绍: Environmental Science & Technology Letters serves as an international forum for brief communications on experimental or theoretical results of exceptional timeliness in all aspects of environmental science, both pure and applied. Published as soon as accepted, these communications are summarized in monthly issues. Additionally, the journal features short reviews on emerging topics in environmental science and technology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信