Dementia with Lewy bodies and Parkinson disease dementia — the same or different and is it important?

IF 28.2 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
YuHong Fu, Glenda M. Halliday
{"title":"Dementia with Lewy bodies and Parkinson disease dementia — the same or different and is it important?","authors":"YuHong Fu, Glenda M. Halliday","doi":"10.1038/s41582-025-01090-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Biological definitions of neurological diseases are now becoming a reality, although still in the research phase. This development will recategorize neurological diseases, providing objective diagnostics and the promise of therapeutics that target biological mechanisms — similar to the strategy that has proven successful in tumours and other conditions. In this Perspective article, we discuss this development for dementias with dominant Lewy pathology, as the availability of biological assays for this pathology has sparked new interest in a single disease diagnosis for all individuals positive for α-synuclein. On the basis of current evidence, we argue that an α-synuclein assay alone is unlikely to be a specific criterion for a spectrum of clinical syndromes with Lewy pathology or a definitive diagnostic marker for Lewy body dementia. We advocate that one biological assay will not reflect the complex spatiotemporal features of brain pathology. Diverse sequential mechanisms underpin the highly heterogeneous phenotypes and clinicopathological processes of Lewy body dementias. Disease modification, if possible, will be most effective when it targets the early underlying mechanisms, especially those leading to aggressive phenotypes.</p>","PeriodicalId":19085,"journal":{"name":"Nature Reviews Neurology","volume":"44 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":28.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Reviews Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41582-025-01090-x","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Biological definitions of neurological diseases are now becoming a reality, although still in the research phase. This development will recategorize neurological diseases, providing objective diagnostics and the promise of therapeutics that target biological mechanisms — similar to the strategy that has proven successful in tumours and other conditions. In this Perspective article, we discuss this development for dementias with dominant Lewy pathology, as the availability of biological assays for this pathology has sparked new interest in a single disease diagnosis for all individuals positive for α-synuclein. On the basis of current evidence, we argue that an α-synuclein assay alone is unlikely to be a specific criterion for a spectrum of clinical syndromes with Lewy pathology or a definitive diagnostic marker for Lewy body dementia. We advocate that one biological assay will not reflect the complex spatiotemporal features of brain pathology. Diverse sequential mechanisms underpin the highly heterogeneous phenotypes and clinicopathological processes of Lewy body dementias. Disease modification, if possible, will be most effective when it targets the early underlying mechanisms, especially those leading to aggressive phenotypes.

Abstract Image

路易体痴呆和帕金森氏痴呆——相同还是不同,重要吗?
神经系统疾病的生物学定义现在正在成为现实,尽管仍处于研究阶段。这一进展将对神经系统疾病进行重新分类,提供客观诊断和针对生物机制的治疗方法的希望——类似于已被证明在肿瘤和其他疾病中成功的策略。在这篇透视文章中,我们讨论了这一发展与显性Lewy病理痴呆,因为这种病理的生物检测的可用性引发了新的兴趣,单一疾病诊断所有个体α-突触核蛋白阳性。根据目前的证据,我们认为单独的α-突触核蛋白检测不太可能成为路易氏病理临床综合征谱的特定标准或路易氏体痴呆的明确诊断标志。我们主张,一个生物分析将不能反映复杂的时空特征的脑病理。不同的顺序机制支持路易体痴呆的高度异质性表型和临床病理过程。疾病改造,如果可能的话,将是最有效的,当它针对早期的潜在机制,特别是那些导致侵略性表型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nature Reviews Neurology
Nature Reviews Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
29.90
自引率
0.80%
发文量
138
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nature Reviews Neurology aims to be the premier source of reviews and commentaries for the scientific and clinical communities we serve. We want to provide an unparalleled service to authors, referees, and readers, and we work hard to maximize the usefulness and impact of each article. The journal publishes Research Highlights, Comments, News & Views, Reviews, Consensus Statements, and Perspectives relevant to researchers and clinicians working in the field of neurology. Our broad scope ensures that the work we publish reaches the widest possible audience. Our articles are authoritative, accessible, and enhanced with clearly understandable figures, tables, and other display items. This page gives more detail about the aims and scope of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信