{"title":"A Systematic Review of Guided, Parent-Led Digital Interventions for Preadolescent Children with Emotional and Behavioural Problems","authors":"Emily Whitaker, Chloe Chessell, Maxwell Klapow, Cathy Creswell","doi":"10.1007/s10567-025-00521-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Emotional and behavioural problems (EBP) are prevalent amongst children, and guided, parent-led digital interventions offer one method of improving access to effective treatments. This systematic review (PROSPERO: CRD42023484098) aimed to examine the evidence base for, and characteristics of, these types of interventions through a narrative synthesis. Systematic searches were conducted using Medline, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Scopus and Web of Science in January 2024 and February 2025, supplemented with hand searching in March/April 2024 and February 2025. Studies were eligible if they reported outcomes related to preadolescent EBP from a guided, fully parent-led, fully digital intervention. Thirteen studies were eligible, including 2643 children and covering eight interventions (addressing anxiety problems, comorbid anxiety and depression, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, conduct disorder and disruptive behaviour). Studies included randomised controlled trials and pre-post studies. The QualSyst checklist was used to assess study quality; all studies were rated as good quality. All studies showed statistically significant improvements in the child’s symptoms or interference levels, with small to very large effect sizes immediately post-treatment, and at least medium effect sizes by follow-up, suggesting a promising evidence base. A wide range of intervention characteristics were identified, forming a basis for future intervention development for childhood EBP. However, there was a lack of consistency in how information was reported across studies (such as completion rates) and studies lacked information on parent demographics and key intervention details. Further high quality randomised controlled trials for a wider range of EBP are needed to continue building the evidence base.</p>","PeriodicalId":51399,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-025-00521-x","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Emotional and behavioural problems (EBP) are prevalent amongst children, and guided, parent-led digital interventions offer one method of improving access to effective treatments. This systematic review (PROSPERO: CRD42023484098) aimed to examine the evidence base for, and characteristics of, these types of interventions through a narrative synthesis. Systematic searches were conducted using Medline, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Scopus and Web of Science in January 2024 and February 2025, supplemented with hand searching in March/April 2024 and February 2025. Studies were eligible if they reported outcomes related to preadolescent EBP from a guided, fully parent-led, fully digital intervention. Thirteen studies were eligible, including 2643 children and covering eight interventions (addressing anxiety problems, comorbid anxiety and depression, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, conduct disorder and disruptive behaviour). Studies included randomised controlled trials and pre-post studies. The QualSyst checklist was used to assess study quality; all studies were rated as good quality. All studies showed statistically significant improvements in the child’s symptoms or interference levels, with small to very large effect sizes immediately post-treatment, and at least medium effect sizes by follow-up, suggesting a promising evidence base. A wide range of intervention characteristics were identified, forming a basis for future intervention development for childhood EBP. However, there was a lack of consistency in how information was reported across studies (such as completion rates) and studies lacked information on parent demographics and key intervention details. Further high quality randomised controlled trials for a wider range of EBP are needed to continue building the evidence base.
期刊介绍:
Editors-in-Chief: Dr. Ronald J. Prinz, University of South Carolina and Dr. Thomas H. Ollendick, Virginia Polytechnic Institute Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal that provides an international, interdisciplinary forum in which important and new developments in this field are identified and in-depth reviews on current thought and practices are published. The Journal publishes original research reviews, conceptual and theoretical papers, and related work in the broad area of the behavioral sciences that pertains to infants, children, adolescents, and families. Contributions originate from a wide array of disciplines including, but not limited to, psychology (e.g., clinical, community, developmental, family, school), medicine (e.g., family practice, pediatrics, psychiatry), public health, social work, and education. Topical content includes science and application and covers facets of etiology, assessment, description, treatment and intervention, prevention, methodology, and public policy. Submissions are by invitation only and undergo peer review. The Editors, in consultation with the Editorial Board, invite highly qualified experts to contribute original papers on topics of timely interest and significance.