A Systematic Review of Guided, Parent-Led Digital Interventions for Preadolescent Children with Emotional and Behavioural Problems

IF 5.5 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Emily Whitaker, Chloe Chessell, Maxwell Klapow, Cathy Creswell
{"title":"A Systematic Review of Guided, Parent-Led Digital Interventions for Preadolescent Children with Emotional and Behavioural Problems","authors":"Emily Whitaker, Chloe Chessell, Maxwell Klapow, Cathy Creswell","doi":"10.1007/s10567-025-00521-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Emotional and behavioural problems (EBP) are prevalent amongst children, and guided, parent-led digital interventions offer one method of improving access to effective treatments. This systematic review (PROSPERO: CRD42023484098) aimed to examine the evidence base for, and characteristics of, these types of interventions through a narrative synthesis. Systematic searches were conducted using Medline, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Scopus and Web of Science in January 2024 and February 2025, supplemented with hand searching in March/April 2024 and February 2025. Studies were eligible if they reported outcomes related to preadolescent EBP from a guided, fully parent-led, fully digital intervention. Thirteen studies were eligible, including 2643 children and covering eight interventions (addressing anxiety problems, comorbid anxiety and depression, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, conduct disorder and disruptive behaviour). Studies included randomised controlled trials and pre-post studies. The QualSyst checklist was used to assess study quality; all studies were rated as good quality. All studies showed statistically significant improvements in the child’s symptoms or interference levels, with small to very large effect sizes immediately post-treatment, and at least medium effect sizes by follow-up, suggesting a promising evidence base. A wide range of intervention characteristics were identified, forming a basis for future intervention development for childhood EBP. However, there was a lack of consistency in how information was reported across studies (such as completion rates) and studies lacked information on parent demographics and key intervention details. Further high quality randomised controlled trials for a wider range of EBP are needed to continue building the evidence base.</p>","PeriodicalId":51399,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-025-00521-x","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Emotional and behavioural problems (EBP) are prevalent amongst children, and guided, parent-led digital interventions offer one method of improving access to effective treatments. This systematic review (PROSPERO: CRD42023484098) aimed to examine the evidence base for, and characteristics of, these types of interventions through a narrative synthesis. Systematic searches were conducted using Medline, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Scopus and Web of Science in January 2024 and February 2025, supplemented with hand searching in March/April 2024 and February 2025. Studies were eligible if they reported outcomes related to preadolescent EBP from a guided, fully parent-led, fully digital intervention. Thirteen studies were eligible, including 2643 children and covering eight interventions (addressing anxiety problems, comorbid anxiety and depression, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, conduct disorder and disruptive behaviour). Studies included randomised controlled trials and pre-post studies. The QualSyst checklist was used to assess study quality; all studies were rated as good quality. All studies showed statistically significant improvements in the child’s symptoms or interference levels, with small to very large effect sizes immediately post-treatment, and at least medium effect sizes by follow-up, suggesting a promising evidence base. A wide range of intervention characteristics were identified, forming a basis for future intervention development for childhood EBP. However, there was a lack of consistency in how information was reported across studies (such as completion rates) and studies lacked information on parent demographics and key intervention details. Further high quality randomised controlled trials for a wider range of EBP are needed to continue building the evidence base.

对有情绪和行为问题的青春期前儿童的引导、父母主导的数字干预的系统回顾
情绪和行为问题(EBP)在儿童中很普遍,父母引导的数字干预提供了一种改善获得有效治疗的方法。本系统综述(PROSPERO: CRD42023484098)旨在通过叙事综合来检查这些类型干预措施的证据基础和特征。2024年1月和2025年2月分别使用Medline、EMBASE、PsycINFO、Scopus和Web of Science进行系统检索,2024年3 / 4月和2025年2月辅以人工检索。如果研究报告了与青春期前EBP相关的结果,这些结果来自一个有指导的、完全由父母主导的、完全数字化的干预。13项研究符合条件,包括2643名儿童,涵盖8项干预措施(解决焦虑问题、共病焦虑和抑郁、注意缺陷多动障碍、品行障碍和破坏性行为)。研究包括随机对照试验和前后研究。使用QualSyst检查表评估研究质量;所有研究均被评为质量良好。所有研究均显示儿童症状或干扰水平在统计学上有显著改善,治疗后立即产生小到非常大的效应,随访时至少产生中等效应,这表明证据基础很有希望。我们发现了广泛的干预特征,为未来儿童EBP的干预发展奠定了基础。然而,各研究报告的信息(如完成率)缺乏一致性,研究缺乏关于父母人口统计和关键干预细节的信息。需要进一步开展更大范围EBP的高质量随机对照试验,以继续建立证据基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: Editors-in-Chief: Dr. Ronald J. Prinz, University of South Carolina and Dr. Thomas H. Ollendick, Virginia Polytechnic Institute Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal that provides an international, interdisciplinary forum in which important and new developments in this field are identified and in-depth reviews on current thought and practices are published. The Journal publishes original research reviews, conceptual and theoretical papers, and related work in the broad area of the behavioral sciences that pertains to infants, children, adolescents, and families. Contributions originate from a wide array of disciplines including, but not limited to, psychology (e.g., clinical, community, developmental, family, school), medicine (e.g., family practice, pediatrics, psychiatry), public health, social work, and education. Topical content includes science and application and covers facets of etiology, assessment, description, treatment and intervention, prevention, methodology, and public policy. Submissions are by invitation only and undergo peer review. The Editors, in consultation with the Editorial Board, invite highly qualified experts to contribute original papers on topics of timely interest and significance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信