Attitudes Toward the Use of Conditional Automated Vehicles in the Technology Acceptance Model Framework: Evidence from an Italian Sample.

IF 4.2 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Giovanni Bruno,Alex Marson,Federica Nenna,Carolina Diaz-Piedra,Andrea Spoto
{"title":"Attitudes Toward the Use of Conditional Automated Vehicles in the Technology Acceptance Model Framework: Evidence from an Italian Sample.","authors":"Giovanni Bruno,Alex Marson,Federica Nenna,Carolina Diaz-Piedra,Andrea Spoto","doi":"10.1089/cyber.2024.0517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Automated vehicles (AVs) have the potential to significantly enhance road safety, traffic efficiency, and mobility access by supporting or replacing human control during driving. However, the success of this transition hinges on people's attitudes. This study explores the dimensionality and factor interactions in the adaptation of the technology acceptance model (TAM) to conditional AVs applied to an Italian sample, to provide a new perspective on the acceptance of the intermediate level of driving automation. After evaluating the content and relevance of the subscales, we analyzed responses from 201 Italian-speaking individuals collected through a questionnaire. Structural equation modeling was employed to examine the scale's factor structure and interrelations. Results indicate that most items demonstrated satisfactory fit and the questionnaire maintained its overall factor structure in the Italian context. Interestingly, an unmediated effect of the Perceived Utility of AVs-and, to a lesser extent, concerns with the manufacturer's compliance with ethical data treatment procedures-were found on the intention to use AVs. These findings contribute to the understanding of factors influencing the acceptance of AVs. They underscore the importance of users' perceptions of both practical utility and proper privacy safeguarding in determining the acceptance of the described AV technology. The implications for the development of TAM extensions and future research directions are also discussed.","PeriodicalId":10872,"journal":{"name":"Cyberpsychology, behavior and social networking","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cyberpsychology, behavior and social networking","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2024.0517","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Automated vehicles (AVs) have the potential to significantly enhance road safety, traffic efficiency, and mobility access by supporting or replacing human control during driving. However, the success of this transition hinges on people's attitudes. This study explores the dimensionality and factor interactions in the adaptation of the technology acceptance model (TAM) to conditional AVs applied to an Italian sample, to provide a new perspective on the acceptance of the intermediate level of driving automation. After evaluating the content and relevance of the subscales, we analyzed responses from 201 Italian-speaking individuals collected through a questionnaire. Structural equation modeling was employed to examine the scale's factor structure and interrelations. Results indicate that most items demonstrated satisfactory fit and the questionnaire maintained its overall factor structure in the Italian context. Interestingly, an unmediated effect of the Perceived Utility of AVs-and, to a lesser extent, concerns with the manufacturer's compliance with ethical data treatment procedures-were found on the intention to use AVs. These findings contribute to the understanding of factors influencing the acceptance of AVs. They underscore the importance of users' perceptions of both practical utility and proper privacy safeguarding in determining the acceptance of the described AV technology. The implications for the development of TAM extensions and future research directions are also discussed.
对技术接受模型框架中使用条件自动驾驶车辆的态度:来自意大利样本的证据。
自动驾驶汽车(AVs)通过支持或取代驾驶过程中的人为控制,有可能显著提高道路安全、交通效率和移动性。然而,这种转变的成功与否取决于人们的态度。本研究探讨了技术接受模型(TAM)在适应条件自动驾驶中的维度和因素相互作用,并应用于意大利样本,以提供对驾驶自动化中级水平接受的新视角。在评估了子量表的内容和相关性之后,我们分析了通过问卷收集的201名意大利语个体的回答。采用结构方程模型对量表的因子结构和相互关系进行检验。结果表明,大多数条目显示出满意的契合度,问卷在意大利语语境中保持了其整体因素结构。有趣的是,在使用自动驾驶汽车的意向上,发现了自动驾驶汽车感知效用的非中介效应,以及在较小程度上与制造商遵守道德数据处理程序的关系。这些发现有助于理解影响自动驾驶汽车接受度的因素。它们强调了在决定是否接受所描述的自动驾驶技术时,用户对实用性和适当隐私保护的看法的重要性。最后讨论了TAM扩展的意义和未来的研究方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
3.00%
发文量
123
期刊介绍: Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking is a leading peer-reviewed journal that is recognized for its authoritative research on the social, behavioral, and psychological impacts of contemporary social networking practices. The journal covers a wide range of platforms, including Twitter, Facebook, internet gaming, and e-commerce, and examines how these digital environments shape human interaction and societal norms. For over two decades, this journal has been a pioneering voice in the exploration of social networking and virtual reality, establishing itself as an indispensable resource for professionals and academics in the field. It is particularly celebrated for its swift dissemination of findings through rapid communication articles, alongside comprehensive, in-depth studies that delve into the multifaceted effects of interactive technologies on both individual behavior and broader societal trends. The journal's scope encompasses the full spectrum of impacts—highlighting not only the potential benefits but also the challenges that arise as a result of these technologies. By providing a platform for rigorous research and critical discussions, it fosters a deeper understanding of the complex interplay between technology and human behavior.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信