Hyojin Chae,Hyejeong Kim,Yoon-Joo Kim,HyunYoung Ji,Eun-Jee Oh,Dong Won Yang
{"title":"Diagnostic Performance of Eight Blood-based Biomarkers in a Well-characterized Korean Cohort of Preclinical Alzheimer's Disease.","authors":"Hyojin Chae,Hyejeong Kim,Yoon-Joo Kim,HyunYoung Ji,Eun-Jee Oh,Dong Won Yang","doi":"10.3343/alm.2024.0498","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background\r\nWith the introduction of disease-modifying treatments for Alzheimer's disease (AD), less invasive and widely accessible screening tests are urgently needed. We assessed eight blood-based biomarkers in a well-defined cohort of preclinical AD, including participants with subjective cognitive decline (SCD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI).\r\n\r\nMethods\r\nAmyloid beta (Aβ) oligomerization tendency, Aβ42, Aβ40, Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio, phosphorylated tau (p-tau)181, p-tau217, glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), and neurofilament light (Nf-L) were assessed for distinguishing between SCD and MCI, for correlations, and for predicting Aβ positron emission tomography (PET) positivity.\r\n\r\nResults\r\nPlasma p-tau181, p-tau217, and GFAP levels were significantly higher in participants with MCI than in those with SCD (P <0.05) and in Aβ PET-positive versus Aβ PET-negative participants (P <0.0001), whereas plasma Aβ42 and Aβ42/40 ratio levels were significantly lower in Aβ PET-positive than in Aβ PET-negative participants (P <0.001). Logistic regression analysis revealed that plasma Aβ42 and p-tau217 levels predicted Aβ PET positivity with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.930 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.848-0.976) in the entire cohort, and p-tau217 alone predicted Aβ PET-positivity with an AUC of 0.887 (95% CI, 0.779-0.954) in the MCI subgroup.\r\n\r\nConclusions\r\nPlasma p-tau217 levels outperform plasma p-tau181 levels in predicting Aβ PET-positivity in participants with preclinical AD. Plasma GFAP levels, along with different p-tau isoforms (p-tau181 and p-tau217), effectively differentiate MCI from SCD. The predictive accuracy of blood-based biomarkers for Aβ PET-positivity strongly supports their clinical implementation, particularly with the introduction of disease-modifying therapies.","PeriodicalId":8421,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Laboratory Medicine","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3343/alm.2024.0498","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
With the introduction of disease-modifying treatments for Alzheimer's disease (AD), less invasive and widely accessible screening tests are urgently needed. We assessed eight blood-based biomarkers in a well-defined cohort of preclinical AD, including participants with subjective cognitive decline (SCD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI).
Methods
Amyloid beta (Aβ) oligomerization tendency, Aβ42, Aβ40, Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio, phosphorylated tau (p-tau)181, p-tau217, glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), and neurofilament light (Nf-L) were assessed for distinguishing between SCD and MCI, for correlations, and for predicting Aβ positron emission tomography (PET) positivity.
Results
Plasma p-tau181, p-tau217, and GFAP levels were significantly higher in participants with MCI than in those with SCD (P <0.05) and in Aβ PET-positive versus Aβ PET-negative participants (P <0.0001), whereas plasma Aβ42 and Aβ42/40 ratio levels were significantly lower in Aβ PET-positive than in Aβ PET-negative participants (P <0.001). Logistic regression analysis revealed that plasma Aβ42 and p-tau217 levels predicted Aβ PET positivity with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.930 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.848-0.976) in the entire cohort, and p-tau217 alone predicted Aβ PET-positivity with an AUC of 0.887 (95% CI, 0.779-0.954) in the MCI subgroup.
Conclusions
Plasma p-tau217 levels outperform plasma p-tau181 levels in predicting Aβ PET-positivity in participants with preclinical AD. Plasma GFAP levels, along with different p-tau isoforms (p-tau181 and p-tau217), effectively differentiate MCI from SCD. The predictive accuracy of blood-based biomarkers for Aβ PET-positivity strongly supports their clinical implementation, particularly with the introduction of disease-modifying therapies.
期刊介绍:
Annals of Laboratory Medicine is the official journal of Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine. The journal title has been recently changed from the Korean Journal of Laboratory Medicine (ISSN, 1598-6535) from the January issue of 2012. The JCR 2017 Impact factor of Ann Lab Med was 1.916.