{"title":"Stimulant Medication Use and Risk of Psychotic Experiences.","authors":"Kirstie O'Hare,Jonah F Byrne,Hugh Ramsay,Liana Romaniuk,Jane McGrath,Dolores Keating,Maria Migone,Karen O'Connor,Nicola Coss,Mary Cannon,David Cotter,Colm Healy,Ian Kelleher","doi":"10.1542/peds.2024-069142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES\r\nThe prescription of stimulant medications for young people with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder is common and increasing. Concerns have been raised about potentially psychotogenic effects of stimulants, and previous observational research has documented an increased risk of psychotic experiences in young people prescribed stimulants. Our aim was to estimate the causal effect of stimulants on psychotic experiences.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nThe trial was emulated using Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study data. Eligible participants were aged between 9 and 14 years. Treatment (stimulant prescription) propensities were derived using covariates indexing demographic factors and mental illness severity. The average causal effect of first stimulant prescription on psychotic experiences by 1-year follow-up was derived using inverse probability of treatment weighting followed by standardization (doubly robust estimation).\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nOf 8391 participants included in the analytical sample, 460 (5.5%) reported 1 or more stimulant prescriptions. In unweighted analyses, stimulant prescription was associated with subsequent psychotic experiences (odds ratio [OR]: 1.46; 95% CI: 1.15-1.84). The reverse, however, was also true, in that baseline psychotic experiences predicted subsequent stimulant treatment (OR: 1.93; 95% CI: 1.57-2.37). When applying doubly robust estimation, there was no evidence of a causal effect of stimulant prescription on the subsequent occurrence of psychotic experiences (OR: 1.09; 95% CI: 0.71-1.56).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nOur findings do not support a causal relationship between stimulant prescription and psychotic experiences. Rather, the association appears to be confounded by factors that both increase probability of stimulant prescription and lead to psychotic experiences.","PeriodicalId":20028,"journal":{"name":"Pediatrics","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2024-069142","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES
The prescription of stimulant medications for young people with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder is common and increasing. Concerns have been raised about potentially psychotogenic effects of stimulants, and previous observational research has documented an increased risk of psychotic experiences in young people prescribed stimulants. Our aim was to estimate the causal effect of stimulants on psychotic experiences.
METHODS
The trial was emulated using Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study data. Eligible participants were aged between 9 and 14 years. Treatment (stimulant prescription) propensities were derived using covariates indexing demographic factors and mental illness severity. The average causal effect of first stimulant prescription on psychotic experiences by 1-year follow-up was derived using inverse probability of treatment weighting followed by standardization (doubly robust estimation).
RESULTS
Of 8391 participants included in the analytical sample, 460 (5.5%) reported 1 or more stimulant prescriptions. In unweighted analyses, stimulant prescription was associated with subsequent psychotic experiences (odds ratio [OR]: 1.46; 95% CI: 1.15-1.84). The reverse, however, was also true, in that baseline psychotic experiences predicted subsequent stimulant treatment (OR: 1.93; 95% CI: 1.57-2.37). When applying doubly robust estimation, there was no evidence of a causal effect of stimulant prescription on the subsequent occurrence of psychotic experiences (OR: 1.09; 95% CI: 0.71-1.56).
CONCLUSIONS
Our findings do not support a causal relationship between stimulant prescription and psychotic experiences. Rather, the association appears to be confounded by factors that both increase probability of stimulant prescription and lead to psychotic experiences.
期刊介绍:
The Pediatrics® journal is the official flagship journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP). It is widely cited in the field of pediatric medicine and is recognized as the leading journal in the field.
The journal publishes original research and evidence-based articles, which provide authoritative information to help readers stay up-to-date with the latest developments in pediatric medicine. The content is peer-reviewed and undergoes rigorous evaluation to ensure its quality and reliability.
Pediatrics also serves as a valuable resource for conducting new research studies and supporting education and training activities in the field of pediatrics. It aims to enhance the quality of pediatric outpatient and inpatient care by disseminating valuable knowledge and insights.
As of 2023, Pediatrics has an impressive Journal Impact Factor (IF) Score of 8.0. The IF is a measure of a journal's influence and importance in the scientific community, with higher scores indicating a greater impact. This score reflects the significance and reach of the research published in Pediatrics, further establishing its prominence in the field of pediatric medicine.