Validation of a self-administered Home ETDRS visual acuity testing (H-ETDRS) for self-monitoring vision changes in retinal diseases.

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Zitian Liu,Yanjing Huang,Ling Jin,Caineng Pan,Xiaotong Han,Yingfeng Zheng
{"title":"Validation of a self-administered Home ETDRS visual acuity testing (H-ETDRS) for self-monitoring vision changes in retinal diseases.","authors":"Zitian Liu,Yanjing Huang,Ling Jin,Caineng Pan,Xiaotong Han,Yingfeng Zheng","doi":"10.1136/bjo-2024-326283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\r\nTo validate a self-administered Home Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (H-ETDRS) visual acuity (VA) test and to assess its accuracy in detecting VA decline in patients with retinal diseases.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nA validation group of 156 participants and a testing group of 100 participants with diabetic retinopathy and age-related macular degeneration were recruited. All participants underwent monocular distance best-corrected VA (BCVA) tests in the study eye using the standard ETDRS (S-ETDRS) charts in clinic and the H-ETDRS device in a simulated home setting. Participants in the validation group repeated both methods. H-ETDRS letter scores were compared with S-ETDRS scores, evaluating mean difference and test-retest reliability (TRR). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated to measure the agreement. Participants in the testing group repeated both methods with a Bangerter filter density of 0.6 to simulate BCVA change. The performance of H-ETDRS in detecting acuity change was evaluated, with S-ETDRS serving as the standard.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nFor the validation group, the mean difference between S-ETDRS and H-ETDRS scores was -1.38 letters (95% limits of agreement (LOA) -6.99 to 4.22). The scores of the two tests were highly correlated with an ICC of 0.98. The mean differences between initial test and retest scores were 0.11 letters (95% LOA -2.62 to 2.84) for S-ETDRS and -0.13 letters (95% LOA -5.64 to 5.38) for H-ETDRS. The ICCs of test-retest letter scores were 1.00 for S-ETDRS and 0.98 for H-ETDRS. For participants in the testing group who showed BCVA decline of one line or more with Bangerter filter, 96.7% were able to detect VA changes using H-ETDRS.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE\r\nThe H-ETDRS test demonstrates high TRR and good concordance with S-ETDRS test for retinal patients. The H-ETDRS is viable for self-monitoring VA changes in retinal diseases, however, further validation studies in actual home settings are warranted.","PeriodicalId":9313,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo-2024-326283","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To validate a self-administered Home Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (H-ETDRS) visual acuity (VA) test and to assess its accuracy in detecting VA decline in patients with retinal diseases. METHODS A validation group of 156 participants and a testing group of 100 participants with diabetic retinopathy and age-related macular degeneration were recruited. All participants underwent monocular distance best-corrected VA (BCVA) tests in the study eye using the standard ETDRS (S-ETDRS) charts in clinic and the H-ETDRS device in a simulated home setting. Participants in the validation group repeated both methods. H-ETDRS letter scores were compared with S-ETDRS scores, evaluating mean difference and test-retest reliability (TRR). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated to measure the agreement. Participants in the testing group repeated both methods with a Bangerter filter density of 0.6 to simulate BCVA change. The performance of H-ETDRS in detecting acuity change was evaluated, with S-ETDRS serving as the standard. RESULTS For the validation group, the mean difference between S-ETDRS and H-ETDRS scores was -1.38 letters (95% limits of agreement (LOA) -6.99 to 4.22). The scores of the two tests were highly correlated with an ICC of 0.98. The mean differences between initial test and retest scores were 0.11 letters (95% LOA -2.62 to 2.84) for S-ETDRS and -0.13 letters (95% LOA -5.64 to 5.38) for H-ETDRS. The ICCs of test-retest letter scores were 1.00 for S-ETDRS and 0.98 for H-ETDRS. For participants in the testing group who showed BCVA decline of one line or more with Bangerter filter, 96.7% were able to detect VA changes using H-ETDRS. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The H-ETDRS test demonstrates high TRR and good concordance with S-ETDRS test for retinal patients. The H-ETDRS is viable for self-monitoring VA changes in retinal diseases, however, further validation studies in actual home settings are warranted.
自我管理的家庭ETDRS视力测试(H-ETDRS)用于自我监测视网膜疾病视力变化的验证
目的验证自行实施的家庭早期治疗糖尿病视网膜病变研究(H-ETDRS)视力(VA)测试,并评估其检测视网膜疾病患者VA下降的准确性。方法纳入验证组156例和试验组100例糖尿病视网膜病变和年龄相关性黄斑变性患者。所有参与者在临床使用标准ETDRS (S-ETDRS)图表和在模拟家庭环境中使用H-ETDRS设备进行研究眼单眼距离最佳矫正VA (BCVA)测试。验证组的参与者重复了这两种方法。比较H-ETDRS字母得分和S-ETDRS得分,评估平均差值和重测信度(TRR)。计算类内相关系数(ICCs)来衡量一致性。试验组以Bangerter过滤密度0.6模拟BCVA变化,重复上述两种方法。以S-ETDRS为标准,评价H-ETDRS检测视力变化的性能。结果验证组S-ETDRS评分与H-ETDRS评分的平均差异为-1.38个字母(95%一致限(LOA) -6.99 ~ 4.22)。这两项测试的得分与0.98的ICC高度相关。S-ETDRS的初始测试和重测分数的平均差异为0.11个字母(95% LOA为-2.62至2.84),H-ETDRS的平均差异为-0.13个字母(95% LOA为-5.64至5.38)。S-ETDRS的复试信分ICCs为1.00,H-ETDRS的ICCs为0.98。对于使用Bangerter滤镜显示BCVA下降一条或多条线的试验组参与者,96.7%的人能够使用H-ETDRS检测到VA变化。结论及相关性:H-ETDRS检测视网膜患者的TRR值较高,与S-ETDRS检测结果具有良好的一致性。H-ETDRS对视网膜疾病患者的VA变化进行自我监测是可行的,然而,需要在实际家庭环境中进行进一步的验证研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
2.40%
发文量
213
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Ophthalmology (BJO) is an international peer-reviewed journal for ophthalmologists and visual science specialists. BJO publishes clinical investigations, clinical observations, and clinically relevant laboratory investigations related to ophthalmology. It also provides major reviews and also publishes manuscripts covering regional issues in a global context.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信