No Differences in Motor Units Discharge Rate Between Females and Males in Explosive Ankle Dorsiflexions.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
Anna Grootenhuis,Fiona C Hiereth,Jakob Škarabot,Marius Oßwald,Alessandro Del Vecchio,Markus Gruber,Luca Ruggiero
{"title":"No Differences in Motor Units Discharge Rate Between Females and Males in Explosive Ankle Dorsiflexions.","authors":"Anna Grootenhuis,Fiona C Hiereth,Jakob Škarabot,Marius Oßwald,Alessandro Del Vecchio,Markus Gruber,Luca Ruggiero","doi":"10.1111/sms.70065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Males and females exhibit comparable levels of explosive strength if the rate of torque development (RTD) is considered relative to the maximal voluntary isometric torque (MVT). Given the greater proportion of type I to type II fibers area in muscles of females than males (~20% in tibialis anterior muscle), with slower contractile kinetics, the discharge rate of motor units (MUDR) in explosive efforts may be higher to compensate for the slower muscle contractile properties. Yet, it is to date unknown whether sex differences in MUDR in explosive efforts exist. Twenty-two females and 12 males (20-34 years) performed electrically evoked and voluntary rapid isometric ankle dorsiflexions. Electrically evoked contractions consisted of three trains of 50 supramaximal stimuli at the common peroneal nerve at 200 Hz. Ten voluntary explosive contractions were then performed while recording high-density electromyography signals from the tibialis anterior. No significant differences were reported between males and females for both voluntary and electrically evoked relative peak RTD (8.0 ± 2.0 vs. 7.7 ± 0.8 and 6.4 ± 0.7 vs. 6.1 ± 2.1 MVT s-1), and for RTD and muscle activity throughout the first 150 ms (p > 0.07). Despite no significant differences, these metrics were not equivalent between sexes when assessed with equivalence testing. Time to peak RTD was shorter in males than females for both contraction types (voluntary: 61 ± 12 vs. 74 ± 14 ms; electrically evoked: 24 ± 3 vs. 28 ± 7 ms; p < 0.01). MUDR at the beginning of the explosive voluntary efforts was not different between sexes (males: 61 ± 15; females: 67 ± 16 Hz; p < 0.23). Overall, despite known sex-related differences within the skeletal muscle, the control of rapid torque production is not different between sexes.","PeriodicalId":21466,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports","volume":"111 1","pages":"e70065"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.70065","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Males and females exhibit comparable levels of explosive strength if the rate of torque development (RTD) is considered relative to the maximal voluntary isometric torque (MVT). Given the greater proportion of type I to type II fibers area in muscles of females than males (~20% in tibialis anterior muscle), with slower contractile kinetics, the discharge rate of motor units (MUDR) in explosive efforts may be higher to compensate for the slower muscle contractile properties. Yet, it is to date unknown whether sex differences in MUDR in explosive efforts exist. Twenty-two females and 12 males (20-34 years) performed electrically evoked and voluntary rapid isometric ankle dorsiflexions. Electrically evoked contractions consisted of three trains of 50 supramaximal stimuli at the common peroneal nerve at 200 Hz. Ten voluntary explosive contractions were then performed while recording high-density electromyography signals from the tibialis anterior. No significant differences were reported between males and females for both voluntary and electrically evoked relative peak RTD (8.0 ± 2.0 vs. 7.7 ± 0.8 and 6.4 ± 0.7 vs. 6.1 ± 2.1 MVT s-1), and for RTD and muscle activity throughout the first 150 ms (p > 0.07). Despite no significant differences, these metrics were not equivalent between sexes when assessed with equivalence testing. Time to peak RTD was shorter in males than females for both contraction types (voluntary: 61 ± 12 vs. 74 ± 14 ms; electrically evoked: 24 ± 3 vs. 28 ± 7 ms; p < 0.01). MUDR at the beginning of the explosive voluntary efforts was not different between sexes (males: 61 ± 15; females: 67 ± 16 Hz; p < 0.23). Overall, despite known sex-related differences within the skeletal muscle, the control of rapid torque production is not different between sexes.
爆炸性踝关节背屈时运动单元放电率男女无差异。
如果考虑扭矩发展速率(RTD)相对于最大自主等距扭矩(MVT),男性和女性表现出相当水平的爆炸强度。鉴于女性肌肉中I型和II型纤维面积的比例大于男性(约占胫骨前肌的20%),收缩动力学较慢,运动单位放电率(MUDR)在爆发力中可能更高,以补偿较慢的肌肉收缩特性。然而,到目前为止,还不清楚MUDR在爆发力中的性别差异是否存在。22名女性和12名男性(20-34岁)进行了电诱发和自愿快速等距踝关节背屈。电诱发的收缩包括在200赫兹下对腓总神经进行三列50次的最大刺激。10次自发性爆发性收缩,同时记录胫骨前肌高密度肌电图信号。自愿性和电诱发的相对峰值RTD(8.0±2.0 vs. 7.7±0.8和6.4±0.7 vs. 6.1±2.1 MVT s-1),以及前150 ms的RTD和肌肉活动(p > 0.07)在男性和女性之间没有显著差异。尽管没有显著差异,但当用等效性测试评估时,这些指标在性别之间并不相等。两种收缩类型中,男性到达RTD峰值的时间均短于女性(自愿收缩:61±12 ms vs 74±14 ms;电诱发:24±3 vs 28±7 ms;p < 0.01)。在爆发性自愿努力开始时的MUDR在性别之间没有差异(男性:61±15;女性:67±16 Hz;p < 0.23)。总的来说,尽管已知骨骼肌中存在与性别相关的差异,但对快速扭矩产生的控制在性别之间并没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
4.90%
发文量
162
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports is a multidisciplinary journal published 12 times per year under the auspices of the Scandinavian Foundation of Medicine and Science in Sports. It aims to publish high quality and impactful articles in the fields of orthopaedics, rehabilitation and sports medicine, exercise physiology and biochemistry, biomechanics and motor control, health and disease relating to sport, exercise and physical activity, as well as on the social and behavioural aspects of sport and exercise.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信