A Probabilistic Approach to Surrogate-Assisted Multi-Objective Optimization of Complex Groundwater Problems

IF 4.6 1区 地球科学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Reygie Q. Macasieb, Jeremy T. White, Damiano Pasetto, Adam J. Siade
{"title":"A Probabilistic Approach to Surrogate-Assisted Multi-Objective Optimization of Complex Groundwater Problems","authors":"Reygie Q. Macasieb, Jeremy T. White, Damiano Pasetto, Adam J. Siade","doi":"10.1029/2024wr038554","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Groundwater management involves a complex decision-making process, often with the need to balance the trade-off between meeting society's demand for water and environmental protection. Therefore effective management of groundwater resources often involves some form of multi-objective optimization (MOO). Many existing software tools offer simulation model-enabled optimization, including evolutionary algorithms, for solving MOO problems. However, such analyses involve a huge amount of numerical process-based model runs, which require significant computational effort, depending on the nonlinearity and dimensionality of the problem, in order to seek the optimal trade-off function known as the Pareto front. Surrogate modeling, through techniques such as Gaussian Process Regression (GPR), is an emerging approach to significantly reduce the number of these model evaluations thereby speeding up the optimization process. Yet, surrogate model predictive uncertainty remains a profound challenge for MOO, as it could mislead surrogate-assisted optimization, which may result in either little computational savings from excessive retraining, or lead to suboptimal and/or infeasible solutions. In this work, we present probabilistic Pareto dominance criteria that considers the uncertainty of GPR emulation during MOO, producing a “cloudy” Pareto front which provides an efficient decision space sampling mechanism for retraining the GPR. We then developed a novel acquisition strategy to manage the solution repository from this cloud and generate an ensemble of infill points for retraining. We demonstrate the capabilities of the algorithm through benchmark test functions and a typical density-dependent coastal groundwater management problem.","PeriodicalId":23799,"journal":{"name":"Water Resources Research","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Resources Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1029/2024wr038554","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Groundwater management involves a complex decision-making process, often with the need to balance the trade-off between meeting society's demand for water and environmental protection. Therefore effective management of groundwater resources often involves some form of multi-objective optimization (MOO). Many existing software tools offer simulation model-enabled optimization, including evolutionary algorithms, for solving MOO problems. However, such analyses involve a huge amount of numerical process-based model runs, which require significant computational effort, depending on the nonlinearity and dimensionality of the problem, in order to seek the optimal trade-off function known as the Pareto front. Surrogate modeling, through techniques such as Gaussian Process Regression (GPR), is an emerging approach to significantly reduce the number of these model evaluations thereby speeding up the optimization process. Yet, surrogate model predictive uncertainty remains a profound challenge for MOO, as it could mislead surrogate-assisted optimization, which may result in either little computational savings from excessive retraining, or lead to suboptimal and/or infeasible solutions. In this work, we present probabilistic Pareto dominance criteria that considers the uncertainty of GPR emulation during MOO, producing a “cloudy” Pareto front which provides an efficient decision space sampling mechanism for retraining the GPR. We then developed a novel acquisition strategy to manage the solution repository from this cloud and generate an ensemble of infill points for retraining. We demonstrate the capabilities of the algorithm through benchmark test functions and a typical density-dependent coastal groundwater management problem.
复杂地下水问题代理辅助多目标优化的概率方法
地下水管理涉及一个复杂的决策过程,往往需要在满足社会对水的需求和环境保护之间取得平衡。因此,地下水资源的有效管理往往涉及某种形式的多目标优化(MOO)。许多现有的软件工具提供支持仿真模型的优化,包括用于解决MOO问题的进化算法。然而,这种分析涉及到大量的基于数值过程的模型运行,这需要大量的计算工作量,这取决于问题的非线性和维度,以寻求最优的权衡函数,即帕累托前沿。通过高斯过程回归(GPR)等技术,代理建模是一种新兴的方法,可以显著减少这些模型评估的数量,从而加快优化过程。然而,代理模型预测的不确定性仍然是MOO面临的一个重大挑战,因为它可能会误导代理辅助优化,从而导致过度再训练所节省的计算量很少,或者导致次优和/或不可行的解决方案。在这项工作中,我们提出了考虑MOO期间探地雷达仿真不确定性的概率帕累托优势准则,产生了一个“多云”的帕累托前沿,为探地雷达的再训练提供了一种有效的决策空间采样机制。然后,我们开发了一种新的获取策略来管理来自该云的解决方案存储库,并生成用于再培训的填充点集合。我们通过基准测试函数和典型的密度依赖的沿海地下水管理问题来证明该算法的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Water Resources Research
Water Resources Research 环境科学-湖沼学
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
13.00%
发文量
599
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: Water Resources Research (WRR) is an interdisciplinary journal that focuses on hydrology and water resources. It publishes original research in the natural and social sciences of water. It emphasizes the role of water in the Earth system, including physical, chemical, biological, and ecological processes in water resources research and management, including social, policy, and public health implications. It encompasses observational, experimental, theoretical, analytical, numerical, and data-driven approaches that advance the science of water and its management. Submissions are evaluated for their novelty, accuracy, significance, and broader implications of the findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信