Native proteins from Galdieria sulphuraria to replace fetal bovine serum in mammalian cell culture

IF 3.9 3区 生物学 Q2 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Hanna Eisenberg, Svenja Hütker, Felicitas Berger, Imke Lang
{"title":"Native proteins from Galdieria sulphuraria to replace fetal bovine serum in mammalian cell culture","authors":"Hanna Eisenberg,&nbsp;Svenja Hütker,&nbsp;Felicitas Berger,&nbsp;Imke Lang","doi":"10.1007/s00253-025-13507-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The use of fetal bovine serum (FBS) in cell culture applications causes high costs and unacceptable animal suffering when FBS is extracted from fetal calves. Despite efforts, the exact composition of FBS still remains partially unresolved. Native proteins in FBS, such as growth factors, and their binding to cell receptors seem to be crucial for cell proliferation and differentiation. Recently, algal extracts with high protein content were considered to reduce the FBS demand. Algae extracts yielded promising results as growth serum in mammalian cell culture. Nevertheless, the dependence on residual FBS and the undefined composition of algae extracts are challenges. In this study, we aimed to yield highly concentrated extracts of native proteins from mixotrophically grown <i>Galdieria sulphuraria</i> to replace FBS in mammalian cell culture. Crude extracts and native proteins were concentrated by ammonium sulfate precipitation, and all extracts underwent heat inactivation (HI) for selective protein inactivation. The remaining proteins’ native conformation was verified by enzyme activity assays. All extracts were used to replace FBS during the cultivation of Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells, and proliferation was tested. We found that <i>G. sulphuraria</i> crude and protein extracts depended on HI to promote CHO cell growth to a similar extent as FBS. CHO cells grown with 5% or 10% heat-treated algal extracts had a relative proliferation of 260 to 230% compared to FBS controls with 210% and 300%, respectively. We anticipate our findings will help replace FBS in mammalian cell culture, increasing sustainability and consumer acceptance.</p>","PeriodicalId":8342,"journal":{"name":"Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology","volume":"109 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00253-025-13507-0.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00253-025-13507-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of fetal bovine serum (FBS) in cell culture applications causes high costs and unacceptable animal suffering when FBS is extracted from fetal calves. Despite efforts, the exact composition of FBS still remains partially unresolved. Native proteins in FBS, such as growth factors, and their binding to cell receptors seem to be crucial for cell proliferation and differentiation. Recently, algal extracts with high protein content were considered to reduce the FBS demand. Algae extracts yielded promising results as growth serum in mammalian cell culture. Nevertheless, the dependence on residual FBS and the undefined composition of algae extracts are challenges. In this study, we aimed to yield highly concentrated extracts of native proteins from mixotrophically grown Galdieria sulphuraria to replace FBS in mammalian cell culture. Crude extracts and native proteins were concentrated by ammonium sulfate precipitation, and all extracts underwent heat inactivation (HI) for selective protein inactivation. The remaining proteins’ native conformation was verified by enzyme activity assays. All extracts were used to replace FBS during the cultivation of Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells, and proliferation was tested. We found that G. sulphuraria crude and protein extracts depended on HI to promote CHO cell growth to a similar extent as FBS. CHO cells grown with 5% or 10% heat-treated algal extracts had a relative proliferation of 260 to 230% compared to FBS controls with 210% and 300%, respectively. We anticipate our findings will help replace FBS in mammalian cell culture, increasing sustainability and consumer acceptance.

从硫铁蛭中提取的天然蛋白在哺乳动物细胞培养中替代胎牛血清
在细胞培养应用中使用胎牛血清(FBS)会导致高昂的成本和从胎牛中提取胎牛血清时不可接受的动物痛苦。尽管做出了努力,但FBS的确切组成部分仍未得到部分解决。FBS中的天然蛋白,如生长因子及其与细胞受体的结合似乎对细胞增殖和分化至关重要。近年来,高蛋白质含量的藻类提取物被认为可以减少对FBS的需求。藻类提取物在哺乳动物细胞培养中作为生长血清具有良好的效果。然而,对残留FBS的依赖和藻类提取物成分的不确定是一个挑战。在这项研究中,我们的目标是从混合营养培养的硫酸Galdieria suluraria中获得高浓度的天然蛋白质提取物,以取代哺乳动物细胞培养中的FBS。采用硫酸铵沉淀法浓缩粗提物和天然蛋白,对粗提物进行热失活(HI),选择性失活蛋白。剩余蛋白的天然构象通过酶活性测定得到验证。在培养中国仓鼠卵巢(CHO)细胞的过程中,所有提取物均替代FBS,并进行增殖试验。我们发现,硫磺草粗提物和蛋白质提取物依赖于HI促进CHO细胞生长的程度与FBS相似。与FBS对照的210%和300%相比,用5%或10%的热处理藻类提取物培养的CHO细胞的相对增殖率分别为260 - 230%。我们预计我们的发现将有助于在哺乳动物细胞培养中取代FBS,提高可持续性和消费者接受度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 工程技术-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
4.00%
发文量
535
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology focusses on prokaryotic or eukaryotic cells, relevant enzymes and proteins; applied genetics and molecular biotechnology; genomics and proteomics; applied microbial and cell physiology; environmental biotechnology; process and products and more. The journal welcomes full-length papers and mini-reviews of new and emerging products, processes and technologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信