{"title":"Compare fixed-bed reactor with fluidized-bed reactor in electrocatalytic advanced oxidation for high-concentration phenol wastewater","authors":"Baowei Wang, Yi Liao, Tingting Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.jwpe.2025.107874","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>High-concentration phenol wastewater poses a serious threat to the environment and humans due to its toxicity and difficulty in biodegradation. Electrocatalytic oxidation is a feasible method to solve phenol pollution. The reactor design is an important aspect of electrocatalytic oxidation. The reaction conditions were optimized in fixed-bed and fluidized-bed reactors with three-dimensional electrocatalytic oxidation. By comparing the two reactors above and optimizing the reaction conditions, a better-engineered reactor configuration can be selected to achieve higher degradation rate, more economical, and more energy-saving goals.</div><div>The optimal experimental conditions were determined by evaluating various parameters viz. initial phenol concentration, electrolyte concentration, current density in fixed-bed and aeration gas types, aeration rate, and catalysts dosage in fluidized-bed. The degradation efficiency of phenol and COD removal efficiency were 95.5 % and 92.3 % after 2 h of treatment in a fixed-bed reactor, respectively. While, they reached 99.8 % and 94.4 % after treatment 1 h in a fluidized-bed reactor, respectively. Experiments with the fixed-bed and fluidized-bed reactors were consecutively repeated 10 times to demonstrate the durability of the 1.1 % Fe-2.7 % Ce/GAC catalysts. This study compared fixed-bed and fluidized-bed reactors in the three-dimensional electrocatalytic oxidation of high-concentration phenol for the first time. The fluidized-bed demonstrated faster phenol removal, establishing it as a preferred option for scaling phenolic wastewater treatment systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17528,"journal":{"name":"Journal of water process engineering","volume":"75 ","pages":"Article 107874"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of water process engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214714425009468","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
High-concentration phenol wastewater poses a serious threat to the environment and humans due to its toxicity and difficulty in biodegradation. Electrocatalytic oxidation is a feasible method to solve phenol pollution. The reactor design is an important aspect of electrocatalytic oxidation. The reaction conditions were optimized in fixed-bed and fluidized-bed reactors with three-dimensional electrocatalytic oxidation. By comparing the two reactors above and optimizing the reaction conditions, a better-engineered reactor configuration can be selected to achieve higher degradation rate, more economical, and more energy-saving goals.
The optimal experimental conditions were determined by evaluating various parameters viz. initial phenol concentration, electrolyte concentration, current density in fixed-bed and aeration gas types, aeration rate, and catalysts dosage in fluidized-bed. The degradation efficiency of phenol and COD removal efficiency were 95.5 % and 92.3 % after 2 h of treatment in a fixed-bed reactor, respectively. While, they reached 99.8 % and 94.4 % after treatment 1 h in a fluidized-bed reactor, respectively. Experiments with the fixed-bed and fluidized-bed reactors were consecutively repeated 10 times to demonstrate the durability of the 1.1 % Fe-2.7 % Ce/GAC catalysts. This study compared fixed-bed and fluidized-bed reactors in the three-dimensional electrocatalytic oxidation of high-concentration phenol for the first time. The fluidized-bed demonstrated faster phenol removal, establishing it as a preferred option for scaling phenolic wastewater treatment systems.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Water Process Engineering aims to publish refereed, high-quality research papers with significant novelty and impact in all areas of the engineering of water and wastewater processing . Papers on advanced and novel treatment processes and technologies are particularly welcome. The Journal considers papers in areas such as nanotechnology and biotechnology applications in water, novel oxidation and separation processes, membrane processes (except those for desalination) , catalytic processes for the removal of water contaminants, sustainable processes, water reuse and recycling, water use and wastewater minimization, integrated/hybrid technology, process modeling of water treatment and novel treatment processes. Submissions on the subject of adsorbents, including standard measurements of adsorption kinetics and equilibrium will only be considered if there is a genuine case for novelty and contribution, for example highly novel, sustainable adsorbents and their use: papers on activated carbon-type materials derived from natural matter, or surfactant-modified clays and related minerals, would not fulfil this criterion. The Journal particularly welcomes contributions involving environmentally, economically and socially sustainable technology for water treatment, including those which are energy-efficient, with minimal or no chemical consumption, and capable of water recycling and reuse that minimizes the direct disposal of wastewater to the aquatic environment. Papers that describe novel ideas for solving issues related to water quality and availability are also welcome, as are those that show the transfer of techniques from other disciplines. The Journal will consider papers dealing with processes for various water matrices including drinking water (except desalination), domestic, urban and industrial wastewaters, in addition to their residues. It is expected that the journal will be of particular relevance to chemical and process engineers working in the field. The Journal welcomes Full Text papers, Short Communications, State-of-the-Art Reviews and Letters to Editors and Case Studies