Compare fixed-bed reactor with fluidized-bed reactor in electrocatalytic advanced oxidation for high-concentration phenol wastewater

IF 6.3 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
Baowei Wang, Yi Liao, Tingting Wang
{"title":"Compare fixed-bed reactor with fluidized-bed reactor in electrocatalytic advanced oxidation for high-concentration phenol wastewater","authors":"Baowei Wang,&nbsp;Yi Liao,&nbsp;Tingting Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.jwpe.2025.107874","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>High-concentration phenol wastewater poses a serious threat to the environment and humans due to its toxicity and difficulty in biodegradation. Electrocatalytic oxidation is a feasible method to solve phenol pollution. The reactor design is an important aspect of electrocatalytic oxidation. The reaction conditions were optimized in fixed-bed and fluidized-bed reactors with three-dimensional electrocatalytic oxidation. By comparing the two reactors above and optimizing the reaction conditions, a better-engineered reactor configuration can be selected to achieve higher degradation rate, more economical, and more energy-saving goals.</div><div>The optimal experimental conditions were determined by evaluating various parameters viz. initial phenol concentration, electrolyte concentration, current density in fixed-bed and aeration gas types, aeration rate, and catalysts dosage in fluidized-bed. The degradation efficiency of phenol and COD removal efficiency were 95.5 % and 92.3 % after 2 h of treatment in a fixed-bed reactor, respectively. While, they reached 99.8 % and 94.4 % after treatment 1 h in a fluidized-bed reactor, respectively. Experiments with the fixed-bed and fluidized-bed reactors were consecutively repeated 10 times to demonstrate the durability of the 1.1 % Fe-2.7 % Ce/GAC catalysts. This study compared fixed-bed and fluidized-bed reactors in the three-dimensional electrocatalytic oxidation of high-concentration phenol for the first time. The fluidized-bed demonstrated faster phenol removal, establishing it as a preferred option for scaling phenolic wastewater treatment systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17528,"journal":{"name":"Journal of water process engineering","volume":"75 ","pages":"Article 107874"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of water process engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214714425009468","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

High-concentration phenol wastewater poses a serious threat to the environment and humans due to its toxicity and difficulty in biodegradation. Electrocatalytic oxidation is a feasible method to solve phenol pollution. The reactor design is an important aspect of electrocatalytic oxidation. The reaction conditions were optimized in fixed-bed and fluidized-bed reactors with three-dimensional electrocatalytic oxidation. By comparing the two reactors above and optimizing the reaction conditions, a better-engineered reactor configuration can be selected to achieve higher degradation rate, more economical, and more energy-saving goals.
The optimal experimental conditions were determined by evaluating various parameters viz. initial phenol concentration, electrolyte concentration, current density in fixed-bed and aeration gas types, aeration rate, and catalysts dosage in fluidized-bed. The degradation efficiency of phenol and COD removal efficiency were 95.5 % and 92.3 % after 2 h of treatment in a fixed-bed reactor, respectively. While, they reached 99.8 % and 94.4 % after treatment 1 h in a fluidized-bed reactor, respectively. Experiments with the fixed-bed and fluidized-bed reactors were consecutively repeated 10 times to demonstrate the durability of the 1.1 % Fe-2.7 % Ce/GAC catalysts. This study compared fixed-bed and fluidized-bed reactors in the three-dimensional electrocatalytic oxidation of high-concentration phenol for the first time. The fluidized-bed demonstrated faster phenol removal, establishing it as a preferred option for scaling phenolic wastewater treatment systems.

Abstract Image

比较固定床反应器与流化床反应器电催化深度氧化高浓度苯酚废水的效果
高浓度苯酚废水因其毒性和难降解性对环境和人类构成严重威胁。电催化氧化是解决苯酚污染的一种可行方法。反应器设计是电催化氧化的一个重要方面。对三维电催化氧化在固定床和流化床反应器中的反应条件进行了优化。通过对上述两种反应器进行比较,并对反应条件进行优化,可以选择更好的工程反应器配置,以达到更高的降解率、更经济、更节能的目标。通过对苯酚初始浓度、电解液浓度、固定床电流密度、曝气气体类型、曝气速率、流化床催化剂用量等参数的综合评价,确定了最佳实验条件。在固定床反应器中处理2 h后,苯酚的降解率为95.5%,COD的去除率为92.3%。而在流化床反应器中处理1 h后,它们分别达到99.8%和94.4%。在固定床和流化床反应器上连续进行了10次实验,以验证1.1% fe - 2.7% Ce/GAC催化剂的耐久性。本研究首次比较了固定床反应器和流化床反应器在高浓度苯酚三维电催化氧化中的应用。流化床证明了更快的苯酚去除,建立了它作为一个首选的选择,以扩大苯酚废水处理系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of water process engineering
Journal of water process engineering Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biotechnology
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
8.60%
发文量
846
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Water Process Engineering aims to publish refereed, high-quality research papers with significant novelty and impact in all areas of the engineering of water and wastewater processing . Papers on advanced and novel treatment processes and technologies are particularly welcome. The Journal considers papers in areas such as nanotechnology and biotechnology applications in water, novel oxidation and separation processes, membrane processes (except those for desalination) , catalytic processes for the removal of water contaminants, sustainable processes, water reuse and recycling, water use and wastewater minimization, integrated/hybrid technology, process modeling of water treatment and novel treatment processes. Submissions on the subject of adsorbents, including standard measurements of adsorption kinetics and equilibrium will only be considered if there is a genuine case for novelty and contribution, for example highly novel, sustainable adsorbents and their use: papers on activated carbon-type materials derived from natural matter, or surfactant-modified clays and related minerals, would not fulfil this criterion. The Journal particularly welcomes contributions involving environmentally, economically and socially sustainable technology for water treatment, including those which are energy-efficient, with minimal or no chemical consumption, and capable of water recycling and reuse that minimizes the direct disposal of wastewater to the aquatic environment. Papers that describe novel ideas for solving issues related to water quality and availability are also welcome, as are those that show the transfer of techniques from other disciplines. The Journal will consider papers dealing with processes for various water matrices including drinking water (except desalination), domestic, urban and industrial wastewaters, in addition to their residues. It is expected that the journal will be of particular relevance to chemical and process engineers working in the field. The Journal welcomes Full Text papers, Short Communications, State-of-the-Art Reviews and Letters to Editors and Case Studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信