Teresa Tavera-Ortiz , José Alberto Zepeda-Domínguez , Luis Malpica-Cruz
{"title":"Global insights into the translocation of marine benthic invertebrates as a fishery management tool","authors":"Teresa Tavera-Ortiz , José Alberto Zepeda-Domínguez , Luis Malpica-Cruz","doi":"10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2025.107733","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the face of declining stocks and increasing demand for seafood, fisheries stakeholders worldwide have sought strategies to recover and improve the productivity and quality of their targeted resources. Marine benthic invertebrate populations are particularly vulnerable to overexploitation due to reduced movement capabilities, gregarious reproductive behavior, and high commercial value. However, they are also suitable for enhancement and recovery. Our study aims to describe the benefits of translocating marine benthic invertebrates for fisheries and the ecological impacts on marine ecosystems. We conducted a literature review on the translocation of fishery-focused marine benthic invertebrates. We identified 29 documented global cases of translocation of fishery-focused marine benthic invertebrates with different actors involved and the level of collaboration among them. We identified three main drivers behind the translocation cases: restocking, improving commercial attributes, and minimizing ecological impact. Although three cases have successfully recovered fishable stocks, improved growth rates, or increased economic yield, six of the cases implemented by the fishing and governmental sectors have not quantified the benefits for fisheries, despite being the main objective of translocation<strong>.</strong> Even less attention has been given to its ecological consequences, as most studies do not evaluate potential impacts on ecosystems. Only two cases have assessed specific risks, such as the homogenization of genetic diversity<strong>.</strong> While translocations can increase resilience to climate change and overfishing, their potential ecological risks warrant careful implementation. Furthermore, any translocation initiative should adopt a resilience-based co-management approach, using the best available information for fisheries management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54698,"journal":{"name":"Ocean & Coastal Management","volume":"267 ","pages":"Article 107733"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ocean & Coastal Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964569125001954","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OCEANOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In the face of declining stocks and increasing demand for seafood, fisheries stakeholders worldwide have sought strategies to recover and improve the productivity and quality of their targeted resources. Marine benthic invertebrate populations are particularly vulnerable to overexploitation due to reduced movement capabilities, gregarious reproductive behavior, and high commercial value. However, they are also suitable for enhancement and recovery. Our study aims to describe the benefits of translocating marine benthic invertebrates for fisheries and the ecological impacts on marine ecosystems. We conducted a literature review on the translocation of fishery-focused marine benthic invertebrates. We identified 29 documented global cases of translocation of fishery-focused marine benthic invertebrates with different actors involved and the level of collaboration among them. We identified three main drivers behind the translocation cases: restocking, improving commercial attributes, and minimizing ecological impact. Although three cases have successfully recovered fishable stocks, improved growth rates, or increased economic yield, six of the cases implemented by the fishing and governmental sectors have not quantified the benefits for fisheries, despite being the main objective of translocation. Even less attention has been given to its ecological consequences, as most studies do not evaluate potential impacts on ecosystems. Only two cases have assessed specific risks, such as the homogenization of genetic diversity. While translocations can increase resilience to climate change and overfishing, their potential ecological risks warrant careful implementation. Furthermore, any translocation initiative should adopt a resilience-based co-management approach, using the best available information for fisheries management.
期刊介绍:
Ocean & Coastal Management is the leading international journal dedicated to the study of all aspects of ocean and coastal management from the global to local levels.
We publish rigorously peer-reviewed manuscripts from all disciplines, and inter-/trans-disciplinary and co-designed research, but all submissions must make clear the relevance to management and/or governance issues relevant to the sustainable development and conservation of oceans and coasts.
Comparative studies (from sub-national to trans-national cases, and other management / policy arenas) are encouraged, as are studies that critically assess current management practices and governance approaches. Submissions involving robust analysis, development of theory, and improvement of management practice are especially welcome.