Socioeconomic inequalities in mental health difficulties over childhood: a longitudinal sex-stratified analysis using the UK Millennium Cohort Study

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Yu Wei Chua , Daniela Schlüter , Anna Pearce , Helen Sharp , David Taylor-Robinson
{"title":"Socioeconomic inequalities in mental health difficulties over childhood: a longitudinal sex-stratified analysis using the UK Millennium Cohort Study","authors":"Yu Wei Chua ,&nbsp;Daniela Schlüter ,&nbsp;Anna Pearce ,&nbsp;Helen Sharp ,&nbsp;David Taylor-Robinson","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Stark socioeconomic inequalities in childhood mental health have been widely reported. Understanding whether they vary with age, by type of difficulty or sex can inform public health policies to tackle socioeconomic inequalities. We investigated the effects of early life childhood socioeconomic circumstances (SECs) (maternal education and household income) on developmental trajectories of externalising and internalising difficulties in childhood and adolescence, in males and females from the UK-representative Millennium Cohort Study (N = 15383). We estimated the Slope Index of Inequality (SII) (absolute difference between the most versus least advantaged) using linear mixed-effects regression models, on parent-reported Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire externalising and internalising difficulties score, at 5, 7, 11, 14, and 17 years(y). The mean externalising score was high at 5y (4.8 [95 %CI: 4.7, 4.9]) and decreased slightly, while mean internalising score increased over childhood, reaching 3.9 [3.8, 4.1] by 17y, with a steeper trend for females in adolescence. Lower maternal education was associated with greater externalising scores at 5y (SII, Male: 3.0 [2.7 to 3.3]; Female: 2.7 [2.4, 3.0]) with inequalities decreasing slightly up to 17y (SII Male: 2.4 [2.0 to 2.7], Female: 2.5 [2.1, 2.8]). Inequalities in internalising scores increased slightly over childhood (SII Female 5y: 1.3 [1.1, 1.6]; 17y: 1.9 [1.5, 2.3]; SII Male 5y = 1.6 [1.3, 1.8], 17y = 1.8 [1.5, 2.2]). Patterns were similar using household income. Disadvantaged SECs are associated with persistently higher levels of parent-reported mental health difficulties up to 17y, with larger effects on externalising than internalising difficulties, but little differences by sex or socioeconomic measure.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49122,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine","volume":"378 ","pages":"Article 118159"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625004897","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Stark socioeconomic inequalities in childhood mental health have been widely reported. Understanding whether they vary with age, by type of difficulty or sex can inform public health policies to tackle socioeconomic inequalities. We investigated the effects of early life childhood socioeconomic circumstances (SECs) (maternal education and household income) on developmental trajectories of externalising and internalising difficulties in childhood and adolescence, in males and females from the UK-representative Millennium Cohort Study (N = 15383). We estimated the Slope Index of Inequality (SII) (absolute difference between the most versus least advantaged) using linear mixed-effects regression models, on parent-reported Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire externalising and internalising difficulties score, at 5, 7, 11, 14, and 17 years(y). The mean externalising score was high at 5y (4.8 [95 %CI: 4.7, 4.9]) and decreased slightly, while mean internalising score increased over childhood, reaching 3.9 [3.8, 4.1] by 17y, with a steeper trend for females in adolescence. Lower maternal education was associated with greater externalising scores at 5y (SII, Male: 3.0 [2.7 to 3.3]; Female: 2.7 [2.4, 3.0]) with inequalities decreasing slightly up to 17y (SII Male: 2.4 [2.0 to 2.7], Female: 2.5 [2.1, 2.8]). Inequalities in internalising scores increased slightly over childhood (SII Female 5y: 1.3 [1.1, 1.6]; 17y: 1.9 [1.5, 2.3]; SII Male 5y = 1.6 [1.3, 1.8], 17y = 1.8 [1.5, 2.2]). Patterns were similar using household income. Disadvantaged SECs are associated with persistently higher levels of parent-reported mental health difficulties up to 17y, with larger effects on externalising than internalising difficulties, but little differences by sex or socioeconomic measure.
儿童期心理健康困难的社会经济不平等:使用英国千年队列研究的纵向性别分层分析
儿童心理健康方面严重的社会经济不平等现象已被广泛报道。了解它们是否随年龄、困难类型或性别而变化,可以为公共卫生政策提供信息,以解决社会经济不平等问题。我们调查了早期生活儿童社会经济环境(SECs)(母亲教育和家庭收入)对儿童期和青春期外化和内化困难发展轨迹的影响,研究对象是来自英国代表性千年队列研究(N = 15383)的男性和女性。我们使用线性混合效应回归模型,对父母报告的优势和困难问卷外化和内化困难评分在5、7、11、14和17岁(y)时的不平等斜率指数(SII)(最弱势与最弱势之间的绝对差异)进行了估计。平均外化得分在5岁时很高(4.8 [95% CI: 4.7, 4.9]),并略有下降,而平均内化得分在童年时期上升,到17岁时达到3.9[3.8,4.1],女性在青春期的趋势更陡峭。较低的母亲教育程度与5岁时较高的外化得分相关(SII,男性:3.0[2.7至3.3];女性:2.7[2.4,3.0]),直到17岁,性别差异略有下降(男性:2.4[2.0至2.7],女性:2.5[2.1,2.8])。内化得分的不平等在儿童期略有增加(SII女性5y: 1.3 [1.1, 1.6];17y: 1.9 [1.5, 2.3];他们男性5 y = 1.6(1.3, 1.8), 17个y = 1.8[1.5, 2.2])。使用家庭收入的情况类似。在17岁之前,处于不利地位的父母报告的心理健康问题水平持续较高,外化问题的影响大于内化问题的影响,但性别或社会经济指标之间的差异不大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Social Science & Medicine
Social Science & Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
762
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Social Science & Medicine provides an international and interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination of social science research on health. We publish original research articles (both empirical and theoretical), reviews, position papers and commentaries on health issues, to inform current research, policy and practice in all areas of common interest to social scientists, health practitioners, and policy makers. The journal publishes material relevant to any aspect of health from a wide range of social science disciplines (anthropology, economics, epidemiology, geography, policy, psychology, and sociology), and material relevant to the social sciences from any of the professions concerned with physical and mental health, health care, clinical practice, and health policy and organization. We encourage material which is of general interest to an international readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信