Hospital Management Accounting Systems: Evolving roles, actors, and interactions

Linxi Shi, Pingli Li, Krishanthi Vithana, Bai Xue, Mahmoud Al-Sayed
{"title":"Hospital Management Accounting Systems: Evolving roles, actors, and interactions","authors":"Linxi Shi, Pingli Li, Krishanthi Vithana, Bai Xue, Mahmoud Al-Sayed","doi":"10.1016/j.bar.2025.101666","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Seeking to offer an integrated understanding of Hospital Management Accounting Systems (HMAS) dynamics—through a synthesis of 196 studies on management accounting in public healthcare since 1980—we provide critical insights into HMAS roles—diagnostic, interactive, culture shaping, political, and symbolic—and their interconnections, shedding light on their (in)effectiveness in relation to relevant actors. The review highlights that different actors contribute significantly to the diverse roles of HMAS, while these roles—if functioning as mechanisms for meaningful change—in turn, impact their activities, managerial awareness, and power relationships. While being criticised for unintentionally intensifying value conflicts, HMAS changes reportedly have long-term impact on shaping organisational culture and reconciling values within broader public management transformations. It underscores the need for the longitudinal perspectives to better capture a holistic insight of the evolving roles and effectiveness of HMAS in empirical research. In this regard, the analytical framework we employed for examining the (in)effectiveness of HMAS and the underlying reasons through actors, roles, and interactions could provide a foundation for future empirical studies. Practically, this review advocates for greater involvement of medical professionals and patients in HMAS, promoting changes that balance flexibility with accountability while respecting medical professionals' autonomy through an interactive approach.","PeriodicalId":501001,"journal":{"name":"The British Accounting Review","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British Accounting Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2025.101666","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Seeking to offer an integrated understanding of Hospital Management Accounting Systems (HMAS) dynamics—through a synthesis of 196 studies on management accounting in public healthcare since 1980—we provide critical insights into HMAS roles—diagnostic, interactive, culture shaping, political, and symbolic—and their interconnections, shedding light on their (in)effectiveness in relation to relevant actors. The review highlights that different actors contribute significantly to the diverse roles of HMAS, while these roles—if functioning as mechanisms for meaningful change—in turn, impact their activities, managerial awareness, and power relationships. While being criticised for unintentionally intensifying value conflicts, HMAS changes reportedly have long-term impact on shaping organisational culture and reconciling values within broader public management transformations. It underscores the need for the longitudinal perspectives to better capture a holistic insight of the evolving roles and effectiveness of HMAS in empirical research. In this regard, the analytical framework we employed for examining the (in)effectiveness of HMAS and the underlying reasons through actors, roles, and interactions could provide a foundation for future empirical studies. Practically, this review advocates for greater involvement of medical professionals and patients in HMAS, promoting changes that balance flexibility with accountability while respecting medical professionals' autonomy through an interactive approach.
医院管理会计系统:演变的角色,参与者和相互作用
为了提供对医院管理会计系统(HMAS)动态的综合理解-通过对1980年以来公共医疗保健管理会计的196项研究的综合-我们提供了对HMAS角色的关键见解-诊断,互动,文化塑造,政治和象征-以及它们之间的相互联系,揭示了它们与相关参与者相关的有效性。本综述强调,不同的行为者对HMAS的不同角色做出了重大贡献,而这些角色——如果作为有意义的变革机制发挥作用——反过来又影响了HMAS的活动、管理意识和权力关系。虽然被批评无意中加剧了价值冲突,但据报道,HMAS的变化对塑造组织文化和在更广泛的公共管理变革中协调价值观具有长期影响。它强调了纵向视角的必要性,以便更好地捕捉到HMAS在实证研究中不断演变的角色和有效性的整体洞察力。在这方面,我们通过参与者、角色和相互作用来检验HMAS有效性及其潜在原因的分析框架可以为未来的实证研究提供基础。实际上,本综述提倡医疗专业人员和患者更多地参与HMAS,促进平衡灵活性和问责制的变化,同时通过互动方式尊重医疗专业人员的自主权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信