Christian Drerup, James E. Herbert-Read, Martin J. How
{"title":"Motion After-Effects Induced by Dynamic Illumination in Crab Vision","authors":"Christian Drerup, James E. Herbert-Read, Martin J. How","doi":"10.1002/ece3.71426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Motion detection is an elementary aspect of most animal visual systems. However, many environments are prone to background motion, which might disrupt the ability of visual systems to detect relevant motion cues. While in humans, background motion can disrupt the detection of visual cues even after the moving background component has ceased, it remains unknown whether natural forms of background motion might also affect other animal visual systems. Here, we test whether prior exposure to naturally occurring ‘caustics’, a form of dynamically moving light patterns commonly found in shallow aquatic environments, can have a persisting effect on an animal's motion detection abilities even after the caustic exposure has stopped. To do this, we established the response probability of the shore crab <i>Carcinus maenas</i> to computer-generated expanding disc stimuli mimicking an approaching predator after exposure to either static or moving caustic scenes. Prior exposure to moving caustics had a short-term persisting effect on visual perception in <i>C. maenas</i>, reducing crabs' likelihood to respond to an approaching predator for at least 2 s after the moving caustics had ceased. Our study shows that even after an exposure period to background motion has ended, the visual response rates in <i>C. maenas</i> can still be reduced for a short period owing to the prior exposure. While this so-called ‘historical effect’ may derive from an adaptation of the crab's visual system to the caustic background motion, we discuss whether it may have survival consequences for this crustacean species.</p>","PeriodicalId":11467,"journal":{"name":"Ecology and Evolution","volume":"15 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ece3.71426","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecology and Evolution","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ece3.71426","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Motion detection is an elementary aspect of most animal visual systems. However, many environments are prone to background motion, which might disrupt the ability of visual systems to detect relevant motion cues. While in humans, background motion can disrupt the detection of visual cues even after the moving background component has ceased, it remains unknown whether natural forms of background motion might also affect other animal visual systems. Here, we test whether prior exposure to naturally occurring ‘caustics’, a form of dynamically moving light patterns commonly found in shallow aquatic environments, can have a persisting effect on an animal's motion detection abilities even after the caustic exposure has stopped. To do this, we established the response probability of the shore crab Carcinus maenas to computer-generated expanding disc stimuli mimicking an approaching predator after exposure to either static or moving caustic scenes. Prior exposure to moving caustics had a short-term persisting effect on visual perception in C. maenas, reducing crabs' likelihood to respond to an approaching predator for at least 2 s after the moving caustics had ceased. Our study shows that even after an exposure period to background motion has ended, the visual response rates in C. maenas can still be reduced for a short period owing to the prior exposure. While this so-called ‘historical effect’ may derive from an adaptation of the crab's visual system to the caustic background motion, we discuss whether it may have survival consequences for this crustacean species.
期刊介绍:
Ecology and Evolution is the peer reviewed journal for rapid dissemination of research in all areas of ecology, evolution and conservation science. The journal gives priority to quality research reports, theoretical or empirical, that develop our understanding of organisms and their diversity, interactions between them, and the natural environment.
Ecology and Evolution gives prompt and equal consideration to papers reporting theoretical, experimental, applied and descriptive work in terrestrial and aquatic environments. The journal will consider submissions across taxa in areas including but not limited to micro and macro ecological and evolutionary processes, characteristics of and interactions between individuals, populations, communities and the environment, physiological responses to environmental change, population genetics and phylogenetics, relatedness and kin selection, life histories, systematics and taxonomy, conservation genetics, extinction, speciation, adaption, behaviour, biodiversity, species abundance, macroecology, population and ecosystem dynamics, and conservation policy.