Adequacy evaluation of 22-gauge needle endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition samples and glass slides preparation for successful comprehensive genomic profiling testing: A single institute experience
{"title":"Adequacy evaluation of 22-gauge needle endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition samples and glass slides preparation for successful comprehensive genomic profiling testing: A single institute experience","authors":"Tami Nagatani, Yoji Wani, Masahiro Takatani, Soichiro Fushimi, Hirofumi Inoue, Shinichiro Hori, Kyohei Kai, Hideki Yamamoto, Tetsuya Okazaki, Maki Tanioka, Hiroyuki Okada, Akira Hirasawa","doi":"10.1002/deo2.70104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>This study aimed to evaluate the successful sequencing rate of Foundation One CDx (F1CDx) using small tissue samples obtained with a 22-gauge needle (22G) through endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle acquisition (EUS-TA) and to propose guidelines for tissue quantity evaluation criteria and proper slide preparation in clinical practice.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Between June 2019 and April 2024, 119 samples of 22G EUS-TA collected for F1CDx testing at Himeji Red Cross Hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Tissue adequacy was only assessed based on tumor cell percentage (≥20%). The procedure stopped when white tissue fragments reached 20 mm during macroscopic on-site evaluation. The specimens were prepared using both ‘tissue preserving sectioning’ to retain tissue within formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded blocks and the ‘thin sectioning matched needle gauge and tissue length’ method with calculation to ensure minimal unstained slides for the 1 mm<sup>3</sup> sample volume criterion. Tissue area from HE slides and sample volume were measured, and F1CDx reports were analyzed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of 119 samples, 108 (90.8%) were suitable for F1CDx. Excluding the cases not submitted for testing, in the 45 cases where F1CDx was done using 22G EUS-TA samples, eight (17.8%) had a sum of tissue area tissue of 25 mm<sup>2</sup> or greater in the HE-stained sample. However, all cases met the F1CDx 1 mm<sup>3</sup> volume criterion by submitting > 30 unstained slides per sample. As a result, 43 of 45 cases (95.6%) were successfully analyzable.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The 22G EUS-TA needle is an effective tool for providing the sufficient tissue volume required for F1CDx.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":93973,"journal":{"name":"DEN open","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/deo2.70104","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DEN open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/deo2.70104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
This study aimed to evaluate the successful sequencing rate of Foundation One CDx (F1CDx) using small tissue samples obtained with a 22-gauge needle (22G) through endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle acquisition (EUS-TA) and to propose guidelines for tissue quantity evaluation criteria and proper slide preparation in clinical practice.
Methods
Between June 2019 and April 2024, 119 samples of 22G EUS-TA collected for F1CDx testing at Himeji Red Cross Hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Tissue adequacy was only assessed based on tumor cell percentage (≥20%). The procedure stopped when white tissue fragments reached 20 mm during macroscopic on-site evaluation. The specimens were prepared using both ‘tissue preserving sectioning’ to retain tissue within formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded blocks and the ‘thin sectioning matched needle gauge and tissue length’ method with calculation to ensure minimal unstained slides for the 1 mm3 sample volume criterion. Tissue area from HE slides and sample volume were measured, and F1CDx reports were analyzed.
Results
Of 119 samples, 108 (90.8%) were suitable for F1CDx. Excluding the cases not submitted for testing, in the 45 cases where F1CDx was done using 22G EUS-TA samples, eight (17.8%) had a sum of tissue area tissue of 25 mm2 or greater in the HE-stained sample. However, all cases met the F1CDx 1 mm3 volume criterion by submitting > 30 unstained slides per sample. As a result, 43 of 45 cases (95.6%) were successfully analyzable.
Conclusions
The 22G EUS-TA needle is an effective tool for providing the sufficient tissue volume required for F1CDx.