Greenhouse gas emissions under perennial bioenergy crops with various nitrogen fertilization rates

IF 2.2 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Upendra M. Sainju, Brett L. Allen, Sadikshya R. Dangi
{"title":"Greenhouse gas emissions under perennial bioenergy crops with various nitrogen fertilization rates","authors":"Upendra M. Sainju,&nbsp;Brett L. Allen,&nbsp;Sadikshya R. Dangi","doi":"10.1002/jeq2.70021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Little information exists about greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions under perennial bioenergy crops (PBCs) with various N fertilization rates. Our objectives were to evaluate the effect of PBCs receiving various N fertilization rates on N<sub>2</sub>O and CH<sub>4</sub> emissions, GHG balance (GHGB), and yield-scaled GHGB (YSGB) and compare them with an annual crop from 2012–2013 to 2013–2014 in the northern Great Plains. The PBCs were intermediate wheatgrass (IW, <i>Thinopyrum intermedium</i> [Host] Barkworth and Dewey), smooth bromegrass (SB, <i>Bromus inermis</i> L.), and switchgrass (SG, <i>Panicum virgatum</i> L.), and N fertilization rates were 0, 28, 56, and 84 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup>. The annual crop was spring wheat (WH, <i>Triticum aestivum</i> L.) with 80 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup>. The N<sub>2</sub>O flux peaked immediately after planting, fertilization, intense precipitation (&gt;15 mm), and snowmelt. Cumulative N<sub>2</sub>O flux was greater for SG than IW and SB with 56 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup> in 2012–2013 and with 28–84 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup> in 2013–2014. The CH<sub>4</sub> flux was not affected by treatments. Carbon sequestration rate at 0–30 cm from 2009 to 2019 was greater for IW than other PBCs. The GHGB and YSGB were greater for SG and SB than IW with almost all N fertilization rates in both years. Comparing PBCs and an annual crop, cumulative N<sub>2</sub>O flux, GHGB, and YSGB were greater for SG than IW, SB, or WH in 2013–2014. The IW can reduce GHG emissions per unit area and per unit crop yield compared to other PBCs and WH.</p>","PeriodicalId":15732,"journal":{"name":"Journal of environmental quality","volume":"54 3","pages":"552-562"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jeq2.70021","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of environmental quality","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jeq2.70021","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Little information exists about greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions under perennial bioenergy crops (PBCs) with various N fertilization rates. Our objectives were to evaluate the effect of PBCs receiving various N fertilization rates on N2O and CH4 emissions, GHG balance (GHGB), and yield-scaled GHGB (YSGB) and compare them with an annual crop from 2012–2013 to 2013–2014 in the northern Great Plains. The PBCs were intermediate wheatgrass (IW, Thinopyrum intermedium [Host] Barkworth and Dewey), smooth bromegrass (SB, Bromus inermis L.), and switchgrass (SG, Panicum virgatum L.), and N fertilization rates were 0, 28, 56, and 84 kg N ha−1. The annual crop was spring wheat (WH, Triticum aestivum L.) with 80 kg N ha−1. The N2O flux peaked immediately after planting, fertilization, intense precipitation (>15 mm), and snowmelt. Cumulative N2O flux was greater for SG than IW and SB with 56 kg N ha−1 in 2012–2013 and with 28–84 kg N ha−1 in 2013–2014. The CH4 flux was not affected by treatments. Carbon sequestration rate at 0–30 cm from 2009 to 2019 was greater for IW than other PBCs. The GHGB and YSGB were greater for SG and SB than IW with almost all N fertilization rates in both years. Comparing PBCs and an annual crop, cumulative N2O flux, GHGB, and YSGB were greater for SG than IW, SB, or WH in 2013–2014. The IW can reduce GHG emissions per unit area and per unit crop yield compared to other PBCs and WH.

Abstract Image

不同施氮量下多年生生物能源作物的温室气体排放
不同施氮量下多年生生物能源作物温室气体(GHG)排放的相关资料很少。本研究的目的是评估不同施氮量对大平原北部地区pbc N2O和CH4排放、GHG平衡(GHGB)和产量比例GHGB (YSGB)的影响,并将其与2012-2013年和2013-2014年的一年生作物进行比较。以中间小麦草(IW, Thinopyrum intermedium[寄主]Barkworth和Dewey)、黄雀花(SB, Bromus inermis L.)和柳枝稷(SG, Panicum virgatum L.)为主要生物量,施氮量分别为0、28、56和84 kg N ha−1。一年生作物为春小麦(WH, Triticum aestivum L.),氮素80 kg ha - 1。N2O通量在种植、施肥、强降水(15mm)和融雪后立即达到峰值。SG累积N2O通量大于IW和SB, 2012-2013年为56 kg N ha - 1, 2013-2014年为28-84 kg N ha - 1。CH4通量不受处理的影响。2009 - 2019年,IW在0-30 cm的固碳速率高于其他PBCs。在两年内几乎所有施氮量下,SG和SB的GHGB和YSGB均大于IW。2013-2014年,SG的累积N2O通量、GHGB和YSGB均大于IW、SB和WH。与其他PBCs和WH相比,IW可以减少单位面积和单位作物产量的温室气体排放量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of environmental quality
Journal of environmental quality 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
123
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Articles in JEQ cover various aspects of anthropogenic impacts on the environment, including agricultural, terrestrial, atmospheric, and aquatic systems, with emphasis on the understanding of underlying processes. To be acceptable for consideration in JEQ, a manuscript must make a significant contribution to the advancement of knowledge or toward a better understanding of existing concepts. The study should define principles of broad applicability, be related to problems over a sizable geographic area, or be of potential interest to a representative number of scientists. Emphasis is given to the understanding of underlying processes rather than to monitoring. Contributions are accepted from all disciplines for consideration by the editorial board. Manuscripts may be volunteered, invited, or coordinated as a special section or symposium.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信