What Stories Does Routine Outcome Monitoring Tell? Contrasting Psychological Distress Scores With In-Therapy Narratives

IF 1.2 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Samantha Zurita-Calderón, Jorge Valdiviezo-Oña, Chris Evans, Clara Paz
{"title":"What Stories Does Routine Outcome Monitoring Tell? Contrasting Psychological Distress Scores With In-Therapy Narratives","authors":"Samantha Zurita-Calderón,&nbsp;Jorge Valdiviezo-Oña,&nbsp;Chris Evans,&nbsp;Clara Paz","doi":"10.1002/capr.70023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>The use of outcome measures in psychotherapy has grown substantially as a method for tracking change. However, the exclusive reliance on quantitative measures may neglect contextual and relational factors affecting client experiences. This study explored how therapist perceptions and contextual factors may play a role in the interpretation of routine outcome monitoring (ROM) scores. The aim was to critically examine two therapy cases where ROM scores indicated no reliable change, yet clients demonstrated narrative improvements from the therapist's view.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This naturalistic study was conducted in a university-affiliated psychotherapy centre. Two clients undergoing narrative therapy completed the CORE-OM before therapy and CORE-10 session-by-session to monitor psychological distress. The Reliable Change Index (RCI) was used to assess the statistical significance of CORE-10 score changes. These outcomes were contrasted with information derived from therapist observations.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Neither client showed statistically significant or reliable change in psychological distress across therapy. However, the therapist's analysis of clients' narratives revealed significant improvements in self-concept and relational dynamics. Themes such as expected family roles, sociocultural expectations and gender norms were key in shaping clients' experiences of psychological distress.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>ROM scores can be useful for tracking clients' change, but their potential is amplified when integrated within a broader monitoring framework that includes therapist observations, and an understanding of the influence of systemic factors on psychological distress. We advocate for multimodal monitoring in psychotherapy research and practice to address the heterogeneity and diversity of change in therapy.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":46997,"journal":{"name":"Counselling & Psychotherapy Research","volume":"25 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/capr.70023","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Counselling & Psychotherapy Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/capr.70023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The use of outcome measures in psychotherapy has grown substantially as a method for tracking change. However, the exclusive reliance on quantitative measures may neglect contextual and relational factors affecting client experiences. This study explored how therapist perceptions and contextual factors may play a role in the interpretation of routine outcome monitoring (ROM) scores. The aim was to critically examine two therapy cases where ROM scores indicated no reliable change, yet clients demonstrated narrative improvements from the therapist's view.

Methods

This naturalistic study was conducted in a university-affiliated psychotherapy centre. Two clients undergoing narrative therapy completed the CORE-OM before therapy and CORE-10 session-by-session to monitor psychological distress. The Reliable Change Index (RCI) was used to assess the statistical significance of CORE-10 score changes. These outcomes were contrasted with information derived from therapist observations.

Results

Neither client showed statistically significant or reliable change in psychological distress across therapy. However, the therapist's analysis of clients' narratives revealed significant improvements in self-concept and relational dynamics. Themes such as expected family roles, sociocultural expectations and gender norms were key in shaping clients' experiences of psychological distress.

Conclusions

ROM scores can be useful for tracking clients' change, but their potential is amplified when integrated within a broader monitoring framework that includes therapist observations, and an understanding of the influence of systemic factors on psychological distress. We advocate for multimodal monitoring in psychotherapy research and practice to address the heterogeneity and diversity of change in therapy.

Abstract Image

常规结果监测告诉我们什么故事?心理困扰评分与治疗中叙述的对比
作为一种跟踪变化的方法,结果测量在心理治疗中的应用已经大大增加。然而,对定量措施的独家依赖可能会忽视影响客户体验的背景和关系因素。本研究探讨了治疗师的感知和情境因素如何在常规结果监测(ROM)评分的解释中发挥作用。目的是批判性地检查两个治疗案例,其中ROM评分没有可靠的变化,但从治疗师的角度来看,客户表现出叙述的改善。方法本研究在一所大学附属心理治疗中心进行。两名接受叙事治疗的患者在治疗前完成了CORE-OM和CORE-10,以监测心理困扰。采用可靠变化指数(reliability Change Index, RCI)评价CORE-10评分变化的统计学意义。这些结果与来自治疗师观察的信息形成对比。结果在整个治疗过程中,两名患者的心理困扰均未出现统计学上显著或可靠的变化。然而,治疗师对来访者叙述的分析显示了自我概念和关系动力学的显著改善。诸如预期的家庭角色、社会文化期望和性别规范等主题是塑造客户心理困扰体验的关键。结论:ROM评分可用于跟踪来访者的变化,但如果将其整合到一个更广泛的监测框架中,包括治疗师的观察和对心理困扰的系统性因素影响的理解,其潜力就会被放大。我们提倡在心理治疗研究和实践中进行多模式监测,以解决治疗变化的异质性和多样性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Counselling & Psychotherapy Research
Counselling & Psychotherapy Research PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: Counselling and Psychotherapy Research is an innovative international peer-reviewed journal dedicated to linking research with practice. Pluralist in orientation, the journal recognises the value of qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods strategies of inquiry and aims to promote high-quality, ethical research that informs and develops counselling and psychotherapy practice. CPR is a journal of the British Association of Counselling and Psychotherapy, promoting reflexive research strongly linked to practice. The journal has its own website: www.cprjournal.com. The aim of this site is to further develop links between counselling and psychotherapy research and practice by offering accessible information about both the specific contents of each issue of CPR, as well as wider developments in counselling and psychotherapy research. The aims are to ensure that research remains relevant to practice, and for practice to continue to inform research development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信