Samantha Zurita-Calderón, Jorge Valdiviezo-Oña, Chris Evans, Clara Paz
{"title":"What Stories Does Routine Outcome Monitoring Tell? Contrasting Psychological Distress Scores With In-Therapy Narratives","authors":"Samantha Zurita-Calderón, Jorge Valdiviezo-Oña, Chris Evans, Clara Paz","doi":"10.1002/capr.70023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>The use of outcome measures in psychotherapy has grown substantially as a method for tracking change. However, the exclusive reliance on quantitative measures may neglect contextual and relational factors affecting client experiences. This study explored how therapist perceptions and contextual factors may play a role in the interpretation of routine outcome monitoring (ROM) scores. The aim was to critically examine two therapy cases where ROM scores indicated no reliable change, yet clients demonstrated narrative improvements from the therapist's view.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This naturalistic study was conducted in a university-affiliated psychotherapy centre. Two clients undergoing narrative therapy completed the CORE-OM before therapy and CORE-10 session-by-session to monitor psychological distress. The Reliable Change Index (RCI) was used to assess the statistical significance of CORE-10 score changes. These outcomes were contrasted with information derived from therapist observations.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Neither client showed statistically significant or reliable change in psychological distress across therapy. However, the therapist's analysis of clients' narratives revealed significant improvements in self-concept and relational dynamics. Themes such as expected family roles, sociocultural expectations and gender norms were key in shaping clients' experiences of psychological distress.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>ROM scores can be useful for tracking clients' change, but their potential is amplified when integrated within a broader monitoring framework that includes therapist observations, and an understanding of the influence of systemic factors on psychological distress. We advocate for multimodal monitoring in psychotherapy research and practice to address the heterogeneity and diversity of change in therapy.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":46997,"journal":{"name":"Counselling & Psychotherapy Research","volume":"25 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/capr.70023","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Counselling & Psychotherapy Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/capr.70023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
The use of outcome measures in psychotherapy has grown substantially as a method for tracking change. However, the exclusive reliance on quantitative measures may neglect contextual and relational factors affecting client experiences. This study explored how therapist perceptions and contextual factors may play a role in the interpretation of routine outcome monitoring (ROM) scores. The aim was to critically examine two therapy cases where ROM scores indicated no reliable change, yet clients demonstrated narrative improvements from the therapist's view.
Methods
This naturalistic study was conducted in a university-affiliated psychotherapy centre. Two clients undergoing narrative therapy completed the CORE-OM before therapy and CORE-10 session-by-session to monitor psychological distress. The Reliable Change Index (RCI) was used to assess the statistical significance of CORE-10 score changes. These outcomes were contrasted with information derived from therapist observations.
Results
Neither client showed statistically significant or reliable change in psychological distress across therapy. However, the therapist's analysis of clients' narratives revealed significant improvements in self-concept and relational dynamics. Themes such as expected family roles, sociocultural expectations and gender norms were key in shaping clients' experiences of psychological distress.
Conclusions
ROM scores can be useful for tracking clients' change, but their potential is amplified when integrated within a broader monitoring framework that includes therapist observations, and an understanding of the influence of systemic factors on psychological distress. We advocate for multimodal monitoring in psychotherapy research and practice to address the heterogeneity and diversity of change in therapy.
期刊介绍:
Counselling and Psychotherapy Research is an innovative international peer-reviewed journal dedicated to linking research with practice. Pluralist in orientation, the journal recognises the value of qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods strategies of inquiry and aims to promote high-quality, ethical research that informs and develops counselling and psychotherapy practice. CPR is a journal of the British Association of Counselling and Psychotherapy, promoting reflexive research strongly linked to practice. The journal has its own website: www.cprjournal.com. The aim of this site is to further develop links between counselling and psychotherapy research and practice by offering accessible information about both the specific contents of each issue of CPR, as well as wider developments in counselling and psychotherapy research. The aims are to ensure that research remains relevant to practice, and for practice to continue to inform research development.