Statistical analysis on background seismicity of Southern California region: application of nearest neighbour declustering and network analysis

IF 1.6 4区 地球科学 Q3 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Aditi Seal, Swarandeep Sahoo, Antonella Peresan, Prosanta Kumar Khan, Niptika Jana
{"title":"Statistical analysis on background seismicity of Southern California region: application of nearest neighbour declustering and network analysis","authors":"Aditi Seal,&nbsp;Swarandeep Sahoo,&nbsp;Antonella Peresan,&nbsp;Prosanta Kumar Khan,&nbsp;Niptika Jana","doi":"10.1007/s10950-025-10288-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We analyse the background seismicity, including mainshocks and isolated events, from a distinct clustered component using the nearest-neighbour declustering method. After declustering the seismic catalog, two components were identified: background and clustered. The clustered component includes isolated networks, and for mainshock selection within each network, we applied outdegree and closeness centrality measures from network theory. This approach differs from the conventional method, which selects mainshocks from individual clusters network based on the highest magnitude. The background events dataset was obtained using the nearest-neighbour method and network analysis. This methodology was applied to the Southern California region, encompassing four significant events with magnitudes greater than 7, over the period 1981–2021. The primary objective is to assess the relationship between background seismicity and the Poisson process, as well as to identify the magnitude threshold at which it aligns with the Poisson model. To accomplish this, the background dataset was divided into specified magnitude ranges from 3 to 4.2, with intervals of 0.2. Temporal statistical tests, including the conditional chi-square test, Brown-Zhao test, and Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, were performed, while the Luen and Stark statistical test was applied for space–time analysis. For nearly all magnitude cut-offs, the temporal statistical tests reject the null hypothesis. The exception is at a magnitude of 3.4, where the temporal test is satisfied; however, the space–time statistical test still rejects the null hypothesis. However, the background dataset for the study region does not conform to the Poisson process in either the temporal or space–time tests across all magnitude thresholds. This inconsistency may be attributed to a limited number of data points at certain magnitude cutoffs, the declustering method used, or the potential need for an alternative conditional model for analysing background events.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16994,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Seismology","volume":"29 2","pages":"485 - 503"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Seismology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10950-025-10288-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We analyse the background seismicity, including mainshocks and isolated events, from a distinct clustered component using the nearest-neighbour declustering method. After declustering the seismic catalog, two components were identified: background and clustered. The clustered component includes isolated networks, and for mainshock selection within each network, we applied outdegree and closeness centrality measures from network theory. This approach differs from the conventional method, which selects mainshocks from individual clusters network based on the highest magnitude. The background events dataset was obtained using the nearest-neighbour method and network analysis. This methodology was applied to the Southern California region, encompassing four significant events with magnitudes greater than 7, over the period 1981–2021. The primary objective is to assess the relationship between background seismicity and the Poisson process, as well as to identify the magnitude threshold at which it aligns with the Poisson model. To accomplish this, the background dataset was divided into specified magnitude ranges from 3 to 4.2, with intervals of 0.2. Temporal statistical tests, including the conditional chi-square test, Brown-Zhao test, and Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, were performed, while the Luen and Stark statistical test was applied for space–time analysis. For nearly all magnitude cut-offs, the temporal statistical tests reject the null hypothesis. The exception is at a magnitude of 3.4, where the temporal test is satisfied; however, the space–time statistical test still rejects the null hypothesis. However, the background dataset for the study region does not conform to the Poisson process in either the temporal or space–time tests across all magnitude thresholds. This inconsistency may be attributed to a limited number of data points at certain magnitude cutoffs, the declustering method used, or the potential need for an alternative conditional model for analysing background events.

南加州地区背景地震活动性的统计分析:近邻聚类和网络分析的应用
我们分析背景地震活动,包括主震和孤立事件,从一个不同的聚类组件使用最近邻聚类方法。在对地震目录进行聚类后,确定了背景和聚类两个组成部分。聚类组件包括孤立的网络,对于每个网络中的主震选择,我们应用了网络理论中的外度和接近中心性度量。这种方法与传统方法不同,传统方法是根据最高震级从单个群集网络中选择主震。采用最近邻法和网络分析法获得背景事件数据集。该方法应用于南加州地区,包括1981-2021年期间4次震级大于7级的重大事件。主要目的是评估背景地震活动性和泊松过程之间的关系,以及确定与泊松模型一致的震级阈值。为了做到这一点,背景数据集被划分为指定的星等范围,从3到4.2,间隔为0.2。时间统计检验包括条件卡方检验、Brown-Zhao检验和Kolmogorov-Smirnov检验,时空分析采用Luen和Stark统计检验。对于几乎所有的量值截止值,时间统计检验都拒绝原假设。例外值为3.4,即满足时间检验;然而,时空统计检验仍然拒绝原假设。然而,研究区域的背景数据集在时间和时空测试中都不符合泊松过程。这种不一致可能是由于在某些量级截止点上的数据点数量有限,所使用的聚类方法,或者可能需要另一种条件模型来分析背景事件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Seismology
Journal of Seismology 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
67
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Seismology is an international journal specialising in all observational and theoretical aspects related to earthquake occurrence. Research topics may cover: seismotectonics, seismicity, historical seismicity, seismic source physics, strong ground motion studies, seismic hazard or risk, engineering seismology, physics of fault systems, triggered and induced seismicity, mining seismology, volcano seismology, earthquake prediction, structural investigations ranging from local to regional and global studies with a particular focus on passive experiments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信