Revisiting the Peloponnese Western Hellenic Arc earthquakes of August 30th, 1926 and July 1st, 1927

IF 1.6 4区 地球科学 Q3 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Aggeliki Barberopoulou, Vasiliki Kouskouna, Athanassios Ganas, George Malaperdas, Maya Nielsen
{"title":"Revisiting the Peloponnese Western Hellenic Arc earthquakes of August 30th, 1926 and July 1st, 1927","authors":"Aggeliki Barberopoulou,&nbsp;Vasiliki Kouskouna,&nbsp;Athanassios Ganas,&nbsp;George Malaperdas,&nbsp;Maya Nielsen","doi":"10.1007/s10950-024-10263-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Two earthquakes from the first half of the twentieth century in the Peloponnese region (southern Greece) are analyzed here. These earthquakes occurred 1 year apart in the summers of 1926 and 1927; epicentral locations in the literature show them close to each other (~ 50 km apart). The earthquakes are of particular importance for at least two reasons: they appear to be of intermediate depth and macroseismic data associated with them has been available until now in paper format. Intermediate depth earthquakes are associated with the subduction zone along the Hellenic arc and do not occur as frequently as crustal earthquakes, therefore making the revisiting of such events even more important. Historical European databases which hold macroseismic data, such as AHEAD ((Albini et al. Istituto Nazionale Di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), 2013), are essential for disseminating this data type and making the different studies for each seismic event in the catalogue available. However, AHEAD includes earthquakes that occurred prior to 1900. Paradoxically, it is easier to find the macroseismic field of an earthquake from the 1500s than one from the early twentieth century. Therefore, disseminating and analyzing the macroseismic data of the two Peloponnese events from this period, previously available only in paper format, is crucial. In line with this goal, newly collected eyewitness accounts with existing observations for these events are presented, while macroseismic intensities are re-assigned in EMS98. Re-estimated epicentres suggest that the 1926 earthquake occurred further offshore, while the 1927 earthquake was on land at the southernmost tip of the Peloponnese peninsula. Isoseismal maps were created for both events using the Rossi-Forel and EMS98 scales. The use of modern unified European macroseismic scale (EMS98) in the study of historical earthquakes is essential for harmonizing the present and past with future hazard and risk analyses. The use of EMS98 with additional IDPs in the construction of isoseismal maps further refines the macroseismic field of the 2 events, while suggesting a different fault rupture orientation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16994,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Seismology","volume":"29 2","pages":"283 - 304"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Seismology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10950-024-10263-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Two earthquakes from the first half of the twentieth century in the Peloponnese region (southern Greece) are analyzed here. These earthquakes occurred 1 year apart in the summers of 1926 and 1927; epicentral locations in the literature show them close to each other (~ 50 km apart). The earthquakes are of particular importance for at least two reasons: they appear to be of intermediate depth and macroseismic data associated with them has been available until now in paper format. Intermediate depth earthquakes are associated with the subduction zone along the Hellenic arc and do not occur as frequently as crustal earthquakes, therefore making the revisiting of such events even more important. Historical European databases which hold macroseismic data, such as AHEAD ((Albini et al. Istituto Nazionale Di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), 2013), are essential for disseminating this data type and making the different studies for each seismic event in the catalogue available. However, AHEAD includes earthquakes that occurred prior to 1900. Paradoxically, it is easier to find the macroseismic field of an earthquake from the 1500s than one from the early twentieth century. Therefore, disseminating and analyzing the macroseismic data of the two Peloponnese events from this period, previously available only in paper format, is crucial. In line with this goal, newly collected eyewitness accounts with existing observations for these events are presented, while macroseismic intensities are re-assigned in EMS98. Re-estimated epicentres suggest that the 1926 earthquake occurred further offshore, while the 1927 earthquake was on land at the southernmost tip of the Peloponnese peninsula. Isoseismal maps were created for both events using the Rossi-Forel and EMS98 scales. The use of modern unified European macroseismic scale (EMS98) in the study of historical earthquakes is essential for harmonizing the present and past with future hazard and risk analyses. The use of EMS98 with additional IDPs in the construction of isoseismal maps further refines the macroseismic field of the 2 events, while suggesting a different fault rupture orientation.

回顾1926年8月30日和1927年7月1日的伯罗奔尼撒西希腊弧地震
这里分析了伯罗奔尼撒地区(希腊南部)20世纪上半叶的两次地震。这些地震发生在1926年和1927年的夏天,间隔一年;文献中的震中位置显示它们彼此很近(相距约50公里)。这些地震之所以特别重要,至少有两个原因:它们似乎是中等深度的,与它们相关的宏观地震数据到目前为止都是可以用纸张形式获得的。中深度地震与沿希腊弧的俯冲带有关,不像地壳地震那样频繁发生,因此,对这类地震的重述就更加重要了。保存宏观地震数据的欧洲历史数据库,如AHEAD (Albini等)。国家地质火山研究所(INGV), 2013),对于传播这种数据类型和对目录中的每个地震事件进行不同的研究至关重要。然而,AHEAD包括1900年之前发生的地震。矛盾的是,找到16世纪地震的宏观地震场比找到20世纪初的地震要容易得多。因此,传播和分析这一时期两次伯罗奔尼撒事件的宏观地震数据是至关重要的,以前只能以纸张形式获得。根据这一目标,本文介绍了新收集的目击者对这些事件的描述和现有的观测结果,同时在EMS98中重新分配了大震烈度。重新估计的震中表明,1926年的地震发生在离岸更远的地方,而1927年的地震发生在伯罗奔尼撒半岛最南端的陆地上。使用Rossi-Forel和EMS98比例尺为这两个事件制作了等震图。在历史地震研究中使用现代统一欧洲大地震标度(EMS98)对于协调现在和过去与未来的危害和风险分析是必不可少的。在构造等震图时,使用EMS98和额外的IDPs进一步细化了这两个事件的大地震场,同时提出了不同的断层破裂方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Seismology
Journal of Seismology 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
67
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Seismology is an international journal specialising in all observational and theoretical aspects related to earthquake occurrence. Research topics may cover: seismotectonics, seismicity, historical seismicity, seismic source physics, strong ground motion studies, seismic hazard or risk, engineering seismology, physics of fault systems, triggered and induced seismicity, mining seismology, volcano seismology, earthquake prediction, structural investigations ranging from local to regional and global studies with a particular focus on passive experiments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信