Applications of machine learning algorithms on the compressive strength of laterite blocks made with metakaolin-based geopolymer and sugarcane molasses

David Sinkhonde , Derrick Mirindi , Ismael Dabakuyo , Tajebe Bezabih , Destine Mashava , Frederic Mirindi
{"title":"Applications of machine learning algorithms on the compressive strength of laterite blocks made with metakaolin-based geopolymer and sugarcane molasses","authors":"David Sinkhonde ,&nbsp;Derrick Mirindi ,&nbsp;Ismael Dabakuyo ,&nbsp;Tajebe Bezabih ,&nbsp;Destine Mashava ,&nbsp;Frederic Mirindi","doi":"10.1016/j.wmb.2025.100212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>To refine the process of anticipating the structural integrity of laterite block components, the use of machine learning (ML) algorithms is required. This study initiates an exploration into forecasting the compressive strength of laterite blocks infused with metakaolin-based geopolymer (MKG) and sugarcane molasses (SM), utilizing machine learning techniques such as artificial neural networks (ANN), random forests (RF), decision trees (DT), and support vector machines (SVM). The models were developed using four input values, including the MKG, SM, laterite soil, and water, with compressive strength as the output. Results show that for all the models, the majority of the data points lie within the error lines range of −20 % and +20 %. Using the Taylor diagram model, the results demonstrate that the SVM (train) model achieves the highest performance in predicting the compressive strength of laterite blocks, with a correlation coefficient of 0.99 and the lowest root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.139. The correlation coefficient values (R) for training and testing algorithm models ranged between 0.65 and 0.99, implying that all models fairly predict the compressive strength of laterite blocks containing MKG and SM. The RF model emerges as an important model for generalization across training and testing phases, with R values of 0.9828 and 0.789, respectively. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis assesses the model’s explainability behavior. According to a SHAP-based feature importance study, age (85.33 %) and water content (17.87 %) are critical components that may improve compressive strength compared to MKG (8.60 %) and SM (6.74 %), respectively. This study not only assists in comprehending the essential parameters necessary for making well-informed decisions but also opens exciting possibilities for the application of ML in fostering sustainable construction practices.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101276,"journal":{"name":"Waste Management Bulletin","volume":"3 3","pages":"Article 100212"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Waste Management Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949750725000410","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To refine the process of anticipating the structural integrity of laterite block components, the use of machine learning (ML) algorithms is required. This study initiates an exploration into forecasting the compressive strength of laterite blocks infused with metakaolin-based geopolymer (MKG) and sugarcane molasses (SM), utilizing machine learning techniques such as artificial neural networks (ANN), random forests (RF), decision trees (DT), and support vector machines (SVM). The models were developed using four input values, including the MKG, SM, laterite soil, and water, with compressive strength as the output. Results show that for all the models, the majority of the data points lie within the error lines range of −20 % and +20 %. Using the Taylor diagram model, the results demonstrate that the SVM (train) model achieves the highest performance in predicting the compressive strength of laterite blocks, with a correlation coefficient of 0.99 and the lowest root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.139. The correlation coefficient values (R) for training and testing algorithm models ranged between 0.65 and 0.99, implying that all models fairly predict the compressive strength of laterite blocks containing MKG and SM. The RF model emerges as an important model for generalization across training and testing phases, with R values of 0.9828 and 0.789, respectively. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis assesses the model’s explainability behavior. According to a SHAP-based feature importance study, age (85.33 %) and water content (17.87 %) are critical components that may improve compressive strength compared to MKG (8.60 %) and SM (6.74 %), respectively. This study not only assists in comprehending the essential parameters necessary for making well-informed decisions but also opens exciting possibilities for the application of ML in fostering sustainable construction practices.
机器学习算法在偏高岭土聚合物和甘蔗糖蜜制成红土块体抗压强度上的应用
为了改进预测红土块构件结构完整性的过程,需要使用机器学习(ML)算法。本研究利用人工神经网络(ANN)、随机森林(RF)、决策树(DT)和支持向量机(SVM)等机器学习技术,对注入偏高岭土聚合物(MKG)和甘蔗糖蜜(SM)的红土块体的抗压强度进行了预测。模型采用MKG、SM、红土和水4个输入值,以抗压强度为输出。结果表明,对于所有模型,大多数数据点位于- 20%和+ 20%的误差线范围内。利用Taylor图模型,结果表明,SVM (train)模型对红土块体抗压强度的预测效果最好,相关系数为0.99,均方根误差(RMSE)最低,为0.139。训练和测试算法模型的相关系数(R)在0.65 ~ 0.99之间,说明所有模型都能较好地预测含MKG和SM红土块体的抗压强度。RF模型是跨训练阶段和测试阶段泛化的重要模型,R值分别为0.9828和0.789。SHapley加性解释(SHAP)分析评估模型的可解释性行为。根据基于shap的特征重要性研究,与MKG(8.60%)和SM(6.74%)相比,年龄(85.33%)和含水量(17.87%)是可能提高抗压强度的关键成分。这项研究不仅有助于理解做出明智决策所需的基本参数,而且为ML在促进可持续建筑实践中的应用开辟了令人兴奋的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信